The Effect of Selenized Glucose with Probiotic on Broiler Growth Performance, Immune Response, Intestine Microflora and Morphology
محورهای موضوعی : Camel
A. Shokrinejad Gerdin
1
(
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
)
M. Afsharmanesh
2
(
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
)
M. Salarmoini
3
(
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
)
M. Khajeh Bami
4
(
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
)
کلید واژه: immunity, Microbial population, Sodium selenite, gut health, selenium-yeast,
چکیده مقاله :
A total of 300 one-day-old broilers were randomly assigned to six dietary treatments in a 3 by 2 factorial treatment arrangement to evaluate the effects of sodium selenite (SS), selenium yeast (SeY), and selenized glucose (SeGlu) supplements, as well as their combination with probiotic, on broiler growth performance, histomorphology, microbial population of the intestine, and immune response. Among the factors investigated were selenium sources (0.3 mg/kg) and probiotic levels (0 and 100 mg/kg of diet). The treatments were tested on five floor pens with ten birds each. Over the entire period, broilers fed SeGlu had a higher body weight gain and a lower feed conversion ratio than broilers fed SeY or SS (P<0.05). Interaction results showed that broilers fed SeGlu plus probiotic had higher lactic acid bacteria counts and lactic acid bacteria/coliform ratios in the ileum than those fed SeY without probiotic (P<0.05). Furthermore, when compared to SS alone, broilers fed SeGlu plus probiotic had greater villus height, villi height to crypt depth ratio, villus surface area, and goblet cell density (P<0.05). Broilers fed diets containing supplemental SeGlu had higher total anti-sheep red blood cells (SRBC) titre, IgG, and IgM titers than SeY and SS (P<0.05). Furthermore, broilers fed SeGlu plus probiotic dietary supplementation had higher IgG at 42 d. As a result, it could be argued that SeGlu, as a novel and simple Se source plus probiotic, is more effective than SS and SeY in improving broiler performance, microbial population, intestinal morphology, and immune response.
Aviagen. (2014). Ross 308: Broiler Nutrition Specification. Aviagen Ltd., Newbridge, UK.
Bakhshalinejad R., Akbari Moghaddam Kakhki R. and Zoidis E. (2018). Effects of different dietary sources and levels of selenium supplements on growth performance, antioxidant status and immune parameters in Ross 308 broiler chickens. British Poult. Sci. 59(1), 81-91.
Bakhshalinejad R., Hassanabadi A. and Swick R.A. (2019). Dietary sources and levels of selenium supplements affect growth performance, carcass yield, meat quality and tissue selenium deposition in broilers. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol. 5(3), 256-263.
Beski S.S.M. and Al-Sardary S.Y.T. (2015). Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic and synbiotic on broiler chickens hematology and intestinal integrity. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 14, 31-36.
Boostani A., Sadeghi A.A., Mousavi S.N., Chamani M. and Kashan N. (2015). Effects of organic, inorganic, and nano-Se on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, cellular and humoral immune responses in broiler chickens exposed to oxidative stress. Livest. Sci. 178, 330-336.
Chadio S.E., Pappas A.C., Papanastasatos A., Pantelia D., Dardamani A., Fegeros K. and Zervas G. (2015). Effects of high selenium and fat supplementation on growth performance and thyroid hormones concentration of broilers. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 29, 202-207.
Clavijo V. and Flórez M.J.V. (2018). The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: A review. Poult. Sci. 97(3), 1006-1021.
Dalia A.M., Loh T.C., Sazili A.Q. and Samsudin A.A. (2020). Influence of bacterial organic selenium on blood parameters, immune response, selenium retention and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. BMC Vet. Res. 16(1), 1-10.
Dalia A.M., Loh T.C., Sazili A.Q., Jahromi M.F. and Samsudin A.A. (2018). Effects of vitamin E, inorganic selenium, bacterial organic selenium, and their combinations on immunity response in broiler chickens. BMC Vet. Res. 14(1), 1-10.
Habibian M., Ghazi S., Moeini M.M. and Abdolmohammadi A. (2014). Effects of dietary selenium and vitamin E on immune response and biological blood parameters of broilers reared under thermoneutral or heat stress conditions. Int. J. Biometeorol. 58(5), 741-752.
Kasaikina M.V., Kravtsova M.A., Lee B.C., Seravalli J., Peterson D.A., Walter J. and Gladyshev V.N. (2011). Dietary selenium affects host selenoproteome expression by influencing the gut microbiota. FASEB J. 25(7), 2492-2499.
Khajeh Bami M., Afsharmanesh M., Salarmoini M. and Ebrahimnejad H. (2022a). Effects of selenium-chitosan on intestinal microflora, intestinal histomorphology, and immune response of broiler chickens. Livest. Sci. 255, 104806-108413.
Khajeh Bami M., Afsharmanesh M., Espahbodi M. and Esmaeilzadeh E. (2022b). Effects of dietary nano-selenium supplementation on broiler chicken performance, meat selenium content, intestinal microflora, intestinal morphology, and immune response. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 69, 126897.
Khan S.H., Ansari J., Haq A.U. and Abbas G. (2012). Black cumin seeds as phytogenic product in broiler diets and its effects on performance, blood constituents, immunity and caecal microbial population. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 11(4), 77-85.
Li J., Shen B., Nie S., Duan Z. and Chen K. (2019). A combination of selenium and polysaccharides: Promising therapeutic potential. Carbohydr. Polym. 206, 163-173.
Lu J., Qu L., Shen M.M., Wang X.G., Guo J., Hu Y.P., Dou T.C. and Wang K.H. (2019). Effects of high-dose selenium-enriched yeast on laying performance, egg quality, clinical blood parameters, organ development, and selenium deposition in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 98(6), 2522-2530.
Mahmoud H.E.D., Ijiri D., Ebeid T.A. and Ohtsuka A. (2016). Effects of dietary nano-selenium supplementation on growth performance, antioxidative status, and immunity in broiler chickens under thermoneutral and high ambient temperature conditions. J. Poult. Sci. 53, 274-283.
Marković R., Ćirić J., Starčević M., Šefer D. and Baltić M.Ž. (2018). Effects of selenium source and level in diet on glutathione peroxidase activity, tissue selenium distribution, and growth performance in poultry. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 19(2), 166-176.
Moghaddam A.Z., Hamzekolaei M.M., Khajali F. and Hassanpour H. (2017). Role of selenium from different sources in prevention of pulmonary arterial hypertension syndrome in broiler chickens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 180 (1), 164-170.
Mohammadi E., Janmohammadi H., Olyayee M., Helan J.A. and Kalanaky S. (2020). Nano selenium improves humoral immunity, growth performance and breast-muscle selenium concentration of broiler chickens. Anim. Prod. Sci. 60(16), 1902-1910.
Muhammad A.I., Mohamed D.A., Chwen L.T., Akit H. and Samsudin A.A. (2021). Effect of selenium sources on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, intestinal morphology, microbial population and digesta volatile fatty acids in laying hens. Animals. 11(6), 1681-1691.
Rao S.V.R., Prakash B., Raju M.V.L.N., Panda A.K., Poonam S. and Murthy O.K. (2013). Effect of supplementing organic se-lenium on performance, carcass traits, oxidative parameters and immune responses in commercial broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 26(2), 247-258.
SAS Institute. (2004). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 9.4. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
Selim N., Radwan N., Youssef S., Eldin T.S. and Elwafa S.A. (2015). Effect of inclusion inorganic, organic or nano selenium forms in broiler diets On: 2-physiological, immunological and toxicity statuses of broiler chicks. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 14(3), 144-154.
Silva V.A., Clemente A.H.S., Nogueira B.R.F., de Carvalho A.C., de Freitas L.F.V.B., Ramos A.D.L.S. and Bertechini A.G. (2019). Supplementation of selenomethionine at different ages and levels on meat quality, tissue deposition, and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 98(5), 2150-2159.
Tang D., Li Z., Mahmood T., Liu D., Hu Y. and Guo, Y. (2020). The association between microbial community and ileal gene expression on intestinal wall thickness alterations in chickens. Poult. Sci. 99(4), 1847-1861.
Yuan D., Zhan X.A. and Wang Y.X. (2012). Effect of selenium sources on the expression of cellular glutathione peroxidase and cytoplasmic thioredoxin reductase in the liver and kidney of broiler breeders and their offspring. Poult. Sci. 91(4), 263-292.
Zhai Q., Cen S., Li P., Tian F., Zhao J., Zhang H. and Chen W. (2018). Effects of dietary selenium supplementation on intestinal barrier and immune responses associated with its modulation of gut microbiota. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 5(12), 724-730.
Zhang S., Liao X., Ma X., Zhang L., Lu L. and Luo X. (2018). Relative bioavailability of ultrafine sodium selenite for broilers fed a conventional corn–soybean meal diet. J. Anim. Sci. 96(11), 4755-4767.
Zhang Z.F. and Kim I.K. (2014). Effects of multistrain probiotics on growth performance, apparent ileal nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, cecal microbial shedding, and excreta odor contents in broilers. Poult. Sci. 93(2), 364-370.
Zhao M., Sun Q., Khogali M.K., Liu L., Geng T., Yu L. and Gong D. (2021a). Dietary selenized glucose increases selenium concentration and antioxidant capacity of the liver, oviduct, and spleen in laying hens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 199(12), 4746-4752.
Zhao M.M., Wen K., Xue Y., Liu L., Geng T.Y., Gong D.Q. and Yu, L. (2021b). Probing the effects of dietary selenised glucose on the selenium concentration, quality, and antioxidant activity of eggs and production performances of laying hens. Animal. 15(11), 100374-100385.
Zhou W., Li P., Liu J. and Yu L. (2020). Kilogram-scale production of selenized glucose. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59(23), 10763-10767.
