جایگاه و اهمیت اسب در فرهنگ ایران باستان
محورهای موضوعی : باستان‌شناسی
1 - دانش آموخته دکتری باستان شناسی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
کلید واژه: اسب, فرهنگ ایران باستان, رزمی, بزمی, سیاسی.,
چکیده مقاله :
اسب در ابعاد گوناگون زندگی مردم ایران باستان، نقشی مهم و تأثیرگذار داشته است. با آن‌که پژوهش‌های متعددی در این‌باره انجام شده است، اما جایگاه و اهمیت اسب در ایران باستان به‌درستی تبیین نشده است. پرسش اصلی این پژوهش آن است که جایگاه و اهمیت اسب در ابعاد چندگانۀ فرهنگ ایران باستان چیست؟ برای پاسخ به این پرسش، داده‌ها به‌شیوۀ کتابخانه‌ای گردآوری و با روش کیفیِ توصیفی‌ـ‌تحلیلی، بر اساس نظریه‌های مارسل موس، نوربرت الیاس و آنتونیو گرامشی تحلیل و تبیین شد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد تعامل انسان ایرانی با اسب در طول تاریخ و در پیوند با سایر ابعاد فرهنگی، به شکل‌گیری عادتوارۀ جسمانیِ سوارکاری انجامید که کارکردی چندگانه داشت؛ به‌ویژه از دورۀ مادها، این عادت‌واره در میدان نبرد نقشی تأثیرگذار ایفا می‌کرد. قدرت اقتصادی و دانش مربوط به اسب در اختیار طبقۀ حاکم بود و اسب به نماد وضعیت اقتصادی و جایگاه اجتماعیِ والا بدل شد. همین طبقه در زمان صلح، از اسب در بزم‌ها استفاده می‌کردند و فعالیت‌های بدنیِ صلح‌آمیزی همچون سوارکاری، چوگان‌بازی و شکار را تجربه می‌نمودند. کارکردهای اسب در جامعه و نبرد با دشمنان سبب شد تا اسب به نمادی برای نمایش قدرت و مشروعیت پادشاهان تبدیل شود؛ همچنین، اسب از اهمیتی مذهبی‌ـ‌آیینی نیز برخوردار بود.
The horse played a significant and influential role in various aspects of life in ancient Iran. Although numerous studies have been conducted on this subject, the true status and importance of the horse in ancient Iranian culture have not been fully elucidated. The central question of this research is: What is the role and significance of the horse across different dimensions of ancient Iranian culture? To answer this question, data were collected through library research and analyzed using a qualitative, descriptive-analytical method, based on the theories of Marcel Mauss, Norbert Elias, and Antonio Gramsci. The findings reveal that the interaction between Iranians and horses throughout history, in connection with other cultural dimensions, led to the formation of a physical habitus of horseback riding, which served multiple functions. Especially from the Median period onward, this habitus had a considerable impact on the battlefield. Economic power and knowledge related to horses were in the hands of the ruling class, and horses became symbols of high economic status and social rank. This same class, during times of peace, used horses in banquets and engaged in peaceful physical activities such as horseback riding, polo (chogān), and hunting. The horse’s role in society and in battles against enemies led to its transformation into a symbol of royal power and legitimacy. Furthermore, the horse also held religious and ritual significance.
Introduction
The horse has long held a central place in the historical, cultural, and symbolic life of ancient Iranian civilizations. Beyond its functional role in transportation and warfare, the horse emerged as a powerful icon of nobility, strength, and divine favor. This study explores the multifaceted significance of the horse in the ancient Iranian cultural landscape, delving into its ritual, military, recreational, economic, and ideological roles from the early Bronze Age through the Sasanian period.
Drawing on archaeological, textual, and iconographic evidence, this research highlights how the deep-rooted relationship between humans and horses shaped social norms and collective identities across millennia. The integration of the horse into the cultural fabric of ancient Iran can be traced through diverse mediums—sculptures, reliefs, seals, and funerary practices—suggesting its symbolic embodiment of both divine connection and worldly power. Horses appear in depictions of kings, warriors, and deities, often associated with sovereignty and martial excellence. Furthermore, their representation in ritual contexts indicates their perceived sacredness.
The study also emphasizes the embodiment of horse culture in the physical and behavioral "habitus" of ancient Iranians, drawing on the theories of Marcel Mauss and Norbert Elias. Riding and caring for horses became a habitual bodily practice, embedded in the routines of both elite and common classes. Polo, hunting, and equestrian games further integrated horses into festive and courtly life. Notably, equestrian practices played a crucial role in constructing hegemonic ideologies, as ruling elites used horsemanship as a symbol of authority, civility, and spiritual legitimacy.
In sum, this paper situates the horse not merely as a domesticated animal, but as a dynamic cultural agent in ancient Iranian society. It seeks to uncover how equestrian traditions influenced state formation, class structures, and ritual expression in a uniquely Iranian context.
Methodology
This study employs a qualitative, descriptive-analytical methodology rooted in library-based research. Data were collected from a broad spectrum of sources including archaeological reports, historical texts, visual artifacts, and scholarly publications. Analytical frameworks from cultural theory—particularly those of Marcel Mauss, Norbert Elias, and Antonio Gramsci—were used to interpret the socio-symbolic dimensions of horse-related practices.
Iconographic analysis of artifacts such as bas-reliefs, seals, silver plates, and sculptures was conducted to trace the evolution and significance of horse motifs. Textual sources, including the Avesta, Shahnameh, and classical Greek accounts, were examined for references to horses in ritual, military, and festive settings. Additionally, comparative studies with other ancient cultures helped contextualize the Iranian equestrian tradition within broader Eurasian frameworks. The study interprets these sources through the lens of bodily habitus, ideology, and social stratification to articulate a comprehensive understanding of the horse’s role in ancient Iranian culture.
Discussion
The role of the horse in ancient Iranian society was deeply interwoven with cultural, military, religious, and economic structures. From the Bronze Age to the late Sasanian period, horses were not merely utilitarian creatures but pivotal agents in shaping human experiences, political ideologies, and social hierarchies.
Militarily, the horse revolutionized warfare in ancient Iran. From the early Scythian and Median periods, mounted warriors used horses for speed, agility, and strategic superiority. The Scythians, renowned for their equestrian archery, passed on riding techniques to the Medes, who later transmitted these skills to the Achaemenids. Persian cavalry became a hallmark of military prowess, with extensive evidence from visual sources—such as tomb reliefs and ceramics—depicting elite horsemen. Horses were also linked to innovation in battlefield tactics, including the use of chariots in earlier phases and the prominence of armored cavalry during the Sasanian era.
Recreationally, the horse was central to elite leisure and ritualized display. Equestrian sports such as polo (chogān) and hunting were not only pastimes but also mechanisms of elite training, bonding, and demonstration of status. These practices mirrored the civilizing process described by Elias, where physical control and mastery over the body were symbolic of broader social discipline. Courtly festivals often featured horses, and polo became institutionalized as both a sport and a ritual act tied to political prestige. Archeological remains, including mural paintings and equestrian paraphernalia, point to a highly ritualized and performative horse culture.
Economically, horses were a symbol of wealth and a medium of exchange. Horse breeding, care, and training became specialized professions often reserved for or controlled by elite groups. Horses were also used in tribute and diplomacy, signifying allegiance or submission. Evidence from texts and funerary practices—such as horse burials in Hasanlu and Babajan—indicates the horse’s role as a sacred and valuable possession, sometimes believed to accompany the dead into the afterlife. The Achaemenid postal system, employing relays of mounted couriers, further underscores the horse’s economic and administrative utility.
In the ideological realm, horses played a vital role in legitimizing royal authority. Sasanian royal imagery often featured mounted kings in triumphant poses, sometimes trampling enemies or engaging in royal hunts. This visual symbolism connected the king’s mastery of the horse to his divine right to rule. Gramsci’s theory of hegemony helps illuminate how horsemanship, as a controlled bodily and cultural practice, contributed to the ruling elite’s narrative of legitimacy. Through ritual, performance, and visual culture, equestrian excellence became a marker of moral, political, and spiritual superiority.
Religiously, horses were linked to Zoroastrian deities such as Mithra and were considered sacred animals associated with light, speed, and truth. Texts such as the Avesta depict horses as divine gifts, and rituals often included horse sacrifices or blessings. This sacred dimension extended to funerary practices, where horses were buried alongside warriors or leaders, symbolizing their noble status and spiritual purity. The link between horses and cosmological order reinforced their presence in ritual and statecraft.
Gender and class distinctions were also articulated through horsemanship. While elite men were most frequently depicted as riders and hunters, women too are occasionally shown in equestrian contexts, particularly in elite funerary art. The control and performance of horsemanship thus became a mode of expressing identity, status, and gender roles. The training of youth in horseback riding, as described in royal education systems, further embedded equestrian practices into elite socialization processes.
Lastly, the equestrian culture of ancient Iran had far-reaching influence. Through conquest, trade, and cultural exchange, Iranian horse practices influenced regions as diverse as Central Asia, the Caucasus, and even parts of Europe. The spread of cavalry tactics, equestrian iconography, and horse-related rituals testifies to the cultural capital embedded in horse traditions. This diffusion was not unidirectional; Iranian practices were also enriched by contact with Scythians, Greeks, Indians, and others.
Taken together, the horse in ancient Iran operated as a multifaceted symbol and tool—of war, peace, power, and sanctity. It permeated nearly all dimensions of life, from royal pageantry to spiritual belief, from economic exchange to physical education. Its centrality underscores the profound entanglement of humans, animals, and culture in shaping ancient Iranian civilization.
Conclusion
The study demonstrates that the horse was far more than a domesticated animal in ancient Iranian culture—it was a potent symbol and active participant in societal development. Through its integration into military, festive, religious, and ideological frameworks, the horse became an essential element in shaping elite identity, state power, and cultural continuity.
Horses facilitated technological advancement in warfare, fostered elite cohesion through ritual sports like polo, and played critical roles in spiritual and royal iconography. Theories of bodily habitus and hegemony reveal how horse-related practices not only reflected but also produced social structures and ideologies. From horse burials and sacred texts to royal reliefs and postal systems, the equestrian tradition served as a unifying thread across centuries of Iranian history.
By combining archaeological, textual, and theoretical insights, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the horse as a dynamic cultural agent. Its presence in multiple spheres of life highlights the complex interplay between human agency, animal companionship, and cultural symbolism. As such, the horse occupies a unique place in the study of ancient civilizations—not only as a bearer of burdens or a tool of war, but as a shaper of culture, identity, and historical memory.
آتشین‌جان، ب.، برزگرکشتلی، ح.، اصیل، ح. ا.، ادیب‌زاده، ح.، اسماعیل‌پور، م.، انوشه، م.، آذر، ش.، اروجلو، ف. (1381). نامه نوشتار چوگان از فرهنگنامه ادبی فارسی: دانشنامه ادب فارسی، اصطلاحات، موضوعات و مضامین ادب فارسی، ج2. تهران: طبع و نشر.
آذربانی، ا.، اکلانتری، ر. (1384). اصول و مبانی تربیت یدنی و ورزش. تهران: آییژ.
آیرین، ج. و (1386). جام حسنلو سی سال بعد. در دژ حسنلو دوره IVB 1100 تا 800 ق.م. تهران: انتشارات گنجینه هنر، صص 110-131.
ادی، س. ک. (1392). آیین شهریاری در شرق (ترجمه فریدون بدره‌ای). تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
اشلومبرگر، د. (1389). هنر اشکانی، تاریخ ایران کمبریج جلد سوم (ترجمه تیمور قادری). تهران: مهتاب.
افخمی، ب.، خسروی، ز. (1397). معنا و کارکرد باغ ایرانی (با تأکید بر دوره هخامنشی). پژوهش‌های ایرانشناسی، 8(2)، 38-21.
الیاده، م. (1389). رساله در تاریخ ادیان (ترجمه جلال ستاری). تهران: سروش.
برجیان، ح.، محمدی‌کرد خیلی، م. (1379). اسب در تاریخ و فرهنگ اقوام ایرانی شمالی. در یادنامه دکتر احمد تفضلی (به کوشش دکتر علی‌اشرف صادقی). تهران: انتشارات سخن، صص 95-107.
بریان، پ. (1381). تاریخ امپراتوری هخامنشیان، ج 1 (ترجمه مهدی سمسار). تهران: زریاب.
جعفری، م. (1382). اسب و باران‌سازی در اساطیر ایران باستان. مجله مطالعات ایرانی، 2(4)، 53-60.
حسن‌دوست، م. (1393). فرهنگ ریشه‌شناسی زبان فارسی، ج 5. تهران: آثار.
دایسون، ر. ه. (1386). معماری عصر آهن. در حسنلو گزارش تحقیقی. در دژ حسنلو دوره IVB 1100 تا 800 ق.م. تهران: انتشارات گنجینه هنر، صص 229-267.
دوستخواه، ج. (1378). اوستا: کهن‌ترین سرودها و متن‌های ایرانی. تهران: مروارید.
دوشائنسی، م. (1386). یراق‌های اسب از حسنلو. در دژ حسنلو دوره IVB 1100 تا 800 ق.م. تهران: انتشارات گنجینه هنر، صص 79-109.
دهقان‌نژاد، ف. (1391). نقش جغرافیا در پیدایش بازی‌های محلّی. سپهر، 21(81)، 76-79.
دیاکونوف، ا. م. (1388). تاریخ ماد (ترجمه کریم کشاورز). تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
رایس، ت. ت. (1388). سکاها (ترجمه رقیه بهزادی). تهران: طهوری.
ستاری، ج. (1395). جهان اسطوره‌شناسی: آئین و اسطوره. تهران: مرکز.
سجادی‌راد، ص.، سجادی‌راد، ک. (1392). بررسی اهمیت اسب در اساطیر ایران و سایر ملل و بازتاب آن در شاهنامۀ فردوسی. پژوهشنامه ادب حماسی، 9 (16)، 99-128.
سلیم، محسن. (1390). تاریخ تمدن و فرهنگ ایران زمین. تهران: جامی.
سولیمرسکی، ت. (1390). سکاها. تاریخ ایران کمبریج جلد اوّل (ترجمه تیمور قادی). تهران: مهتاب.
شاهچراغی، آ. (1391). پارادایم‌های پردیس (درآمدی بر بازشناسی و بازآفرینی باغ ایرانی)، چ3. تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی واحد تهران.
رحیم‌پور، ش. (1394). بررسی جایگاه اسب از اسطوره تا تدوام نقش آن بر فرش. نگارینه هنر اسلامی، 2(6)، 21-36.
شیروئی، م.، مدرسی، فاطمه. (1397). کردارهای شاهان در شاهنامه فردوسی. زبان و ادبیات فارسی، 1(۱)، 79-103.
صالحی، ک. (1395). تکوین و تحول در روند سیاست‌های نظامی جامعه ماد. جامعه‌شناسی تاریخی، 8 (1)، 231-262.
طالب‌پور، ف.، پرهام، م. (1388). جایگاه اسب در هنر ایران باستان. جلوه هنر، دوره جدید(1)، 5-11.
طلایی، ح. (1387). عصر آهن ایران. تهران: سمت.
عیسوی، ر.، محرم‌زاده، م.، محمدزاده، ح. (1389). نگاهی به اسب و اسب سواری در ایران. مطالعات ایرانی، 9(17)، 133-156.
غیبی، غ.ر. (1395). اسب در میدان رزم و بزم (با استناد به منظومه‌های پهلوانی و حماسی پس از شاهنامه: گرشاسب‌نامه، بهمن‌نامه، کوش‌نامه و فرامرزنامه). ادبیات فارسی، 14(35)، 25-48.
فاضلی، م.، ریاضی، م.ر. (1389). تبیین ویژگی‌های نگاره‌های مثنوی گوی و چوگان. نگره، (15)، 83-93.
فرخ، ک. (1390). سایه‌های صحرا ایران باستان در جنگ (ترجمه شهربانو صارمی). تهران: ققنوس.
فره‌وشی، ب. (1386). کارنامه اردشیر بابکان (چ4). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
قائمی، ف.، یاحقی، م.ج. (1388). اسب؛ پرتکرارترین نمادینه‌ی جانوری در شاهنامه و نقش آن در تکامل کهن‌الگوی قهرمان. متن پژوهی ادبی، (42)، 9-26.
قلی‌زاده، خ. (1392). دانشنامه اساطیری جانوران و اصطلاحات وابسته. تهران: بنگاه و نشر کتاب.
کرمی چمه، ی. (1393). بازشناسی چوگان، بازی بومی ایران. فرهنگ مردم ایران، (36)، 55-78.
گزنفون. (1350). کورش‌نامه (ترجمه رضا مشایخی). تهران: بنگاه و نشر کتاب.
گیرشمن، ر. (390). هنر ایران در دوران پارتی و ساسانی (ترجمه بهرام فره‌وشی). تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
گیرشمن، ر. (1346). هنر ایران در دورة ماد و هخامنشی (ترجمه عیسی بهنام). تهران: بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
ماحوزی، م. (1377). اسب در ادبیات فارسی و فرهنگ ایرانی. مجله دانشکده و علوم انسانی، (146)، 209-235.
ماسکار، ا. و. (1386). نبرد حسنلو در اواخر قرن نهم ق.م. در دژ حسنلو دوره IVB 1100 تا 800 ق.م. تهران: انتشارات گنجینه هنر، صص 53-78.
مشکور، م. ج.، مشکور، م. (1374). تاریخ سیاسی و اجتماعی اشکانیان و پارتیان یا پهلویان قدیم. تهران: دنیای کتاب.
ملازاده، ک. (1393). باستان‌شناسی ماد. تهران: سمت.
واشقانی فراهانی، ا.، مقدم‌پور، ن. (1392). رزم و بزم در هنر ایرانی. مطالعات ایرانی، 12(2)، 303-323.
وثوقی، م.، نیک‌خلق، ع. ا. (1390). مبانی جامعه‌شناسی (چ 1). تهران: توتیا.
هِد، د. (1391). ارتش ایران هخامنشی (ترجمه محمد آقاجری). ققنوس.
هرمان، ج. (1387). تجدید حیات هنر و تمدن در ایران باستان. ترجمه مهرداد وحدتی. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
Aminzadeh, B., Samani, F., & Bahrami, B. (2006). A non-destructive excavation in Parse-Pasargad archaeological region.
Anderson, J. K. (1975). Greek chariot-borne and mounted infantry. American Journal of Archaeology, 79(3), 175–187.
Anthony, D. W. (1995). Horse, wagon & chariot: Indo-European languages and archaeology. Antiquity, 69(264), 554–565.
Avassoli, M. M., Rezazadeh Langroodi, R., & Saremi Naeini, D. (2012). Iran and India: A survey on link roads and trade (with special reference on archaeological evidences). The International Journal of Humanities, 18(1), 19–41.
Babaev, I., Gagoshidze, I., & Knauß, F. S. (2007). Battle scene on the Munich wood. In Achaemenid culture and local traditions in Anatolia, Southern Caucasus and Iran: New discoveries.
Bivar, A. D. H. (2005). Mithraism: A religion for the ancient Medes. Iranica Antiqua, 40, 341–358.
Cameron, G. G. (1936). History of early Iran. Greenwood Press.
Chehabi, H. E., & Guttmann, A. (2002). From Iran to all of Asia: The origin and diffusion of polo. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 19(2–3), 384–400.
Curtis, J. (1998). A chariot scene from Persepolis. Iran, 36(1), 45–51.
Dani, A. H., Staff, U. N. E. S. C. O., Asimov, M. S., Litvinsky, B. A., Samghabadi, R. S., & Bosworth, C. E. (1994). History of civilizations of Central Asia: The development of sedentary and nomadic civilizations, 700 BC to A (Vol. 2). UNESCO.
De Waele, A. (2005). The figurative wall painting of the Sasanian period from Iran, Iraq and Syria. Iranica Antiqua, 39, 339–381.
Dusinberre, E. R. M. (2010). Anatolian crossroads: Achaemenid seals from Sardis and Gordion. In The world of Achaemenid Persia: History, art and society in Iran and the Ancient Near East (pp. 323–336). Proceedings of a conference at the British Museum, London.
Femia, J. (2002). Hegemony and consciousness in the thought of Antonio Gramsci. In J. Martin (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci (pp. xx–xx). Routledge.
(لطفاً صفحات را اگر در دست دارید بفرستید تا کامل شود.)
Fontana, B. (1993). Hegemony and power: On the relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli. University of Minnesota Press.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.
Harmatta, J., Etemadi, G. F., & Puri, B. N. (Eds.). (1994). The development of sedentary and nomadic civilizations: 700 BC to AD 250 (Vol. 2). UNESCO.
Honeychurch, W. (2014). Alternative complexities: The archaeology of pastoral nomadic states. Journal of Archaeological Research, 22(4), 277–326.
Hussman, G. C. (1976). Nomadic and early Chinese art: Correlations (Master’s thesis, California State University, Northridge).
Invernizzi, A. (2011). Parthian art – Arsacid art. Topoi. Orient-Occident, 17(1), 189–207.
Tascher, J. (1991). The royal Scythians (Master’s thesis, California State University, Los Angeles).
Jessup, J. E. (1970). Scythia: The early era of steppe nomadism. A survey based on recent archaeological discoveries and other studies which relate to the development of various cultures on the Eurasian Steppe (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University).
Justinus. (1994). Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus, 41.3.
Kelley, T. (2003). Persian propaganda: A neglected factor in Xerxes’ invasion of Greece and Herodotus. Iranica Antiqua, 38, 173–219.
Kent, R. G. (1953). Old Persian: Grammar, texts, lexicon. New Haven: American Oriental Society.
Kuiper, K. (Ed.). (2010). Mesopotamia: The world’s earliest civilization. Britannica Educational Publishing.
Kuzmina, E. (2000). The Eurasian steppes: The transition from early urbanism to nomadism. In Kurgans, ritual sites and settlements: Eurasian Bronze and Iron Age (pp. 118–189). BAR International Series, Oxford.
Lawrence, D. R., & Mills, H. (1908). Zarathushtra, Philo, the Achaemenids and Israel. The Open Court Publishing Company.
Lincoln, B. (2012). Happiness for mankind: Achaemenian religion and the imperial project. Peeters.
Malandra, W. W. (Ed.). (1983). An introduction to ancient Iranian religion: Readings from the Avesta and Achaemenid inscriptions (Vol. 2). University of Minnesota Press.
Mashayekh, S. (2010). Epic of “Kārnāmag ī Ardaxšīr ī Pābagān”, and the late Sasanian period (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine).
Mauss, M. (1936). Les techniques du corps. Journal de Psychologie, 32(3–4), 271–293.
Mayo, P. (1999). Gramsci, Freire and adult education: Possibilities for transformative action. Zed Books.
Mehrafarin, R., Abbasi, Z. V., & Saadatiyan, M. (2013). Clothing of people in Sistan during Parthian period with reference to the frescos of Koh-e Khajeh. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(8), 308–319.
Nimchuk, C. L. (2001). Darius I and the formation of the Achaemenid Empire: Communicating the creation of an empire (Master’s thesis, University of Toronto).
Nimer, J., & Lundahl, B. (2007). Animal-assisted therapy: A meta-analysis. Anthrozoös, 20(3), 225–238.
Nyberg, H. S. (1974). A Manual of Pahlavi (Vol. 2). Wiesbaden.
Overlaet, B. (2004). Luristan metalwork in the Iron Age. In Persia’s ancient splendour: Mining, handicraft and archaeology (pp. 328–338). Deutsches Bergbau-Museum.
Parpola, A. (2005). The Nâsatyas, the chariot and Proto-Aryan religion. Journal of Indological Studies, 16/17, 1–63.
Sajjadi, S. M. S. (2007). Wall painting from Dahaneh-ye Gholaman (Sistan). In Achaemenid culture and local traditions in Anatolia, Southern Caucasus and Iran (pp. 129–154). Brill.
Shilling, C. (1993). The body and social theory. Sage Publications.
Sjöberg, A. W. (1985). Trials of strength. Expedition, 27(2), 7–9.
Spier, D. L. (1975). The influences of warfare on the recreational activities of the ancient Assyrians and Iranians.
Strinati, D. (2004). An introduction to theories of popular culture. Routledge.
Tada, R. (2008). Apollodorus of Artemita and the rise of the Parthian Empire (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington).
Daryaee, T. (2009). Sasanian Persia: The rise and fall of an empire. I.B. Tauris.
Trotter, K. S., Chandler, C. K., Goodwin-Bond, D., & Casey, J. (2008). A comparative study of the efficacy of group equine-assisted counseling with at-risk children and adolescents. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3(3), 254–284.
Vogelsang, W. (1998). Medes, Scythians and Persians: The rise of Darius in a North–South perspective. Iranica Antiqua, 33, 158–159.
Wendelken, R. W. (2000). Horses and gold: The Scythians of the Eurasian steppes. In The role of migration in the history of the Eurasian steppe (pp. 189–206). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wiesehöfer, J. (2003). Das antike Persien. Zürich/München.
Yamauchi, E. (1983). The Scythians: Invading hordes from the Russian steppes. The Biblical Archaeologist, 46(2), 90–99.
