Optimization of main parameters affecting activity and octane number produced from catalytic isomerization of n-heptane using response surface methodology
محورهای موضوعی : Iranian Journal of Catalysis
1 - Department of Applied Chemistry, Kosar University of Bojnord, North Khorasan, Iran
کلید واژه: response surface methodology, Analysis of Variance, Design of Experiment, n-Heptane isomerization, Research octane number,
چکیده مقاله :
In this work, the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was investigated by applying the Design of the Experiment in normal heptane isomerization. The design was guided to three surface responses on the dependency of normal heptane conversion, isomerization selectivity, and research octane number on the reaction temperature (200 - 350 °C), the weight percentage of protonated Zeolite Socony Mobil–5 (HZSM-5) zeolite in catalyst structure (10 - 40 weight percent) and time on stream (1 - 6 h). The Analysis of Variance for Pt-supported micro/mesoporous catalysts indicated that the reaction temperature was the prominent significant variable in normal heptane conversion, the development of isomers, and research octane number followed by weight percent of HZSM-5 and time on stream. The optimum research octane number predicted from the response surface analysis is ~ 61 at the reaction temperature of 350 °C, weight percent of HZSM-5 of 25%, and time on stream of 1 h.
[1] W. M. Shehata, M. F. Mohamed, F. K. Gad, Egypt. J. Pet. 27 (2018) 945-953.
[2] N. Parsafard, M. H. Peyrovi, M. Rashidzadeh, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 200 (2014) 190-198.
[3] C. Lin, Z. Yang, H. Pan, J. Cui, Z. Lv, P. Tian, Z. Xiao, P. Li, J. Xu, Y. F. Han, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 617 (2021) 118116.
[4] N. Parsafard, M. H. Peyrovi, M. Rashidzadeh, Chin. J. Catal. 37 (2016) 1477-1486.
[5] W. Li, Y. Zhu, J. Chen, Y. Lu, S. Li, Y. Zheng, D. Wang, Z. Zheng, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 155 (2021) 105099.
[6] H. Y. Zhang, Y. Q. Song, Z. H. Wang, X. L. Zhou, L. F. Chen, Huadong Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, (2018) 807-815.
[7] M. H. Peyrovi, N. Parsafard, M. A. Hajiabadi, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 49 (2017) 283-292.
[8] N. Parsafard, M. H. Peyrovi, N. Parsafard, React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 120 (2017) 231-246.
[9] V. Abdolkarimi, A. Sari, S. Shokri, Fuel. 328 (2022) 125304.
[10] N. Parsafard, A. G. Asil, Sh. Mirzaei, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 53 (2021) 971-981.
[11] P. Tamizhdurai, P. S. Krishnan, A. Ramesh, K. Shanthi, Polyhedron. 154 (2018) 314-324.
[12] L. Gao, Z. Shi, U. J. Etim, P. Wu, W. Xing, Y. Zhang, P. Bai, Z. Yan, Fuel. 252 (2019) 653-665.
[13] M. Ibrahim, A. A. Jalil, N. F. Khusnun, N. A. A. Fatah, M. Y. S. Hamid, Y. Gambo, A. A. Abdulrasheed, N. S. Hassan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 45 (2020) 18587-18599.
[14] M. Aryaeinezhad, Z. Nasri, B. Roozbehani, Pet. Sci. Tech. (2022) 1-25.
[15] H. D. Setiabudi, A. A. Jalil, S. Triwahyono, N. H. N. Kamarudin, R. Jusoh, Chem. Eng. J. 217 (2013) 300-309.
[16] H. Hasanudin, W. R. Asri, M. Said, P. T. Hidayati, W. Purwaningrum, N. Novia, K. Wijaya, RSC Adv. 12 (2022) 16431-16443.
[17] R. S. Hamied, Z. M. Shakor, A. H. Sadeiq, A. A. A. Razak, A. T. Khadim, Kinetic Modeling of Light Naphtha Hydroisomerization in an Industrial Universal Oil Products Penex™ Unit, Energy Eng., DOI: 10.32604/ee.2023.028441.
[18] N. A. A. Fatah, S. Triwahyono, A. A. Jalil, N. Salamun, C. R. Mamat, Z. A. Majid, Chem. Eng. J. 314 (2017) 650-659.
[19] F. M. Elfghi, N. A. S. Amin, M. M. Elgarni, J. Adv. Catal. Sci. Tech. 2 (2015) 1-17.
