A Model for Supply Chain Management Maturity Assessment using a Fuzzy Decision-making Approach: An Empirical Study
محورهای موضوعی : Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling JournalMaryam Rahmaty 1 , Adel Pourghader Chobar 2 , Changiz Valmohammadi 3 , Masoud Vasee 4
1 - Department of Management, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran
2 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
3 - Department of Industrial Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran
کلید واژه: Process survey tools model, Supply chain, Maturity level, automotive industry, Fuzzy Delphi technique,
چکیده مقاله :
This paper presents a model for evaluating the maturity level of supply chain processes in an automobile manufacturer. The model is based on maturity models that are commonly used to evaluate supply chain performance. The study involved 20 industry experts and managers who provided data through a questionnaire. The maturity indices of supply chain processes were identified through a literature review, and the Fuzzy Delphi technique was used to select the most important maturity variables of the supply chain processes. The study identified fifteen indicators across five main dimensions: integration and coordination, strategy, resilience, improvement and development, and agility. To prioritize and identify the relationships among the indicators, a combined approach of Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP was used. The process survey tools model was then applied to evaluate the maturity level of each process and the entire automobile manufacturer supply chain. The supplier relationship management process scored 3.07, the internal processes scored 2.95, and the customer relationship management process scored 2.68. The overall score of the automobile manufacturer supply chain was 2.92. In conclusion, the research indicates that the automobile manufacturer's supply chain processes are in a good state, but further efforts are needed to achieve maximum customer satisfaction, particularly in the area of customer relationship management.
This paper presents a model for evaluating the maturity level of supply chain processes in an automobile manufacturer. The model is based on maturity models that are commonly used to evaluate supply chain performance. The study involved 20 industry experts and managers who provided data through a questionnaire. The maturity indices of supply chain processes were identified through a literature review, and the Fuzzy Delphi technique was used to select the most important maturity variables of the supply chain processes. The study identified fifteen indicators across five main dimensions: integration and coordination, strategy, resilience, improvement and development, and agility. To prioritize and identify the relationships among the indicators, a combined approach of Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP was used. The process survey tools model was then applied to evaluate the maturity level of each process and the entire automobile manufacturer supply chain. The supplier relationship management process scored 3.07, the internal processes scored 2.95, and the customer relationship management process scored 2.68. The overall score of the automobile manufacturer supply chain was 2.92. In conclusion, the research indicates that the automobile manufacturer's supply chain processes are in a good state, but further efforts are needed to achieve maximum customer satisfaction, particularly in the area of customer relationship management.
1. Abazari, S. R., Aghsami, A., & Rabbani, M. (2021). Prepositioning and distributing relief items in humanitarian logistics with uncertain parameters. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 74, 100933.
2. Motevalli, S. H., Pourghader Chobar, A., Ebrahimi, M., & Alamiparvin, R. (2024). A Fuzzy Multi-objective Optimization Model in Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design Considering Financial Flow. Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling Journal, 5(1), 27-45.
3. Aghsami, A., Samimi, Y., & Aghaie, A. (2023). A combined continuous-time Markov chain and queueing-inventory model for a blood transfusion network considering ABO/Rh substitution priority and unreliable screening laboratory. Expert Systems with Applications, 215, 119360.
4. Alidrisi, H. (2021). Measuring the environmental maturity of the supply chain finance: a big data-based multi-criteria perspective. Logistics, 5(2), 22.
5. Balouei Jamkhaneh, H., & Safaei Ghadikolaei, A. H. (2022). Measuring the maturity of service supply chain process: a new framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(1), 245-288.
6. Balouei Jamkhaneh, H., Shahin, R., & Shahin, A. (2023). Assessing sustainable tourism development through service supply chain process maturity and service quality model. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(7), 2046-2068.
7. Batista, L., Dora, M., Toth, J., Molnár, A., Malekpoor, H., & Kumari, S. (2019). Knowledge management for food supply chain synergies–a maturity level analysis of SME companies. Production Planning & Control, 30(10-12), 995-1004.
8. Broft, R., Badi, S. M., & Pryke, S. (2016). Towards supply chain maturity in construction. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(2), 187-204.
9. Büyüközkan, G., Güler, M., & Mukul, E. (2020). Evaluation of supply chain analytics maturity level with a hesitant fuzzy MCDM technique. In Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making: Proceedings of the INFUS 2019 Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, July 23-25, 2019 (pp. 1076-1084). Springer International Publishing.
10. Cagri Tolga, A., Tuysuz, F., & Kahraman, C. (2013). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for retail location selection. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 12(04), 729-755.
11. Caiado, R. G. G., Scavarda, L. F., Gavião, L. O., Ivson, P., de Mattos Nascimento, D. L., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020). Fuzzy rule-based industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing and supply chain management operations. International Journal of Production Economics.
12. Cavalcante de Souza Feitosa, I. S., Ribeiro Carpinetti, L. C., & de Almeida-Filho, A. T. (2021). A supply chain risk management maturity model and a multi-criteria classification approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(9), 2636-2655.
13. Çelik, M. T., & Arslankaya, S. (2023). Analysis of quality control criteria in an business with the fuzzy DEMATEL method: Glass business example. Journal of Engineering Research, 11(2), 100039.
14. Chen, H.; Papazafeiropoulou, A.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Maturity of supply chain integration within small- and medium-sized enterprises: Lessons from the Taiwan IT manufacturing sector. Int. J. Manage. Enterp. Dev. 2010, 9, 325-347, doi:10.1504/IJMED.2010.037562.
15. Cho, Y. I., Nam, S. H., Cho, K. Y., Yoon, H. C., & Woo, J. H. (2022). Minimize makespan of permutation flowshop using pointer network. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 9(1), 51-67.
16. Correia, E., Garrido-Azevedo, S., & Carvalho, H. (2023). Supply Chain Sustainability: A Model to Assess the Maturity Level. Systems, 11(2), 98.
17. Cubo, C., Oliveira, R., Fernandes, A. C., Sampaio, P., Carvalho, M. S., & Afonso, P. (2023). An innovative maturity model to assess supply chain quality management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(1), 103-123.
18. Dellana, S., & F. Kros, J. (2014). An exploration of quality management practices, perceptions and program maturity in the supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(6), 786-806.
19. Demir, S., Gunduz, M. A., Kayikci, Y., & Paksoy, T. (2023). Readiness and maturity of smart and sustainable supply chains: a model proposal. Engineering Management Journal, 35(2), 181-206.
20. Durdyev, S., Mohandes, S. R., Mahdiyar, A., & Ismail, S. (2022). What drives clients to purchase green building?: The cybernetic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(10), 4015-4039.
21. Ghasemi, P., & Abolghasemian, M. (2023). A Stackelberg game for closed-loop supply chains under uncertainty with genetic algorithm and gray wolf optimization. Supply Chain Analytics, 4, 100040.
22. Ferreira, M. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2017). Maturity levels of material cycles and waste management in a context of green supply chain management: an innovative framework and its application to Brazilian cases. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19, 516-525.
23. Garcia Reyes, H., & Giachetti, R. (2010). Using experts to develop a supply chain maturity model in Mexico. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(6), 415-424.
24. Ghafourian, K., Kabirifar, K., Mahdiyar, A., Yazdani, M., Ismail, S., & Tam, V. W. (2021). A synthesis of express analytic hierarchy process (EAHP) and partial least squares-structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM) for sustainable construction and demolition waste management assessment: The case of Malaysia. Recycling, 6(4), 73.
25. Gogus, O., & Boucher, T. O. (1998). Strong transitivity, rationality and weak monotonicity in fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy sets and systems, 94(1), 133-144.
26. Goodarzian, F., Abraham, A., Ghasemi, P., Mascolo, M. D., & Nasseri, H. (2021). Designing a green home healthcare network using grey flexible linear programming: Heuristic approaches. Journal of computational design and engineering, 8(6), 1468-1498.
27. Mehrani, K., Mirshahvalad, A., & Abbasi, E. (2019). Comparison of the Accuracy of Black Hole Algorithms and Gravitational Research and the Hybrid Method in Portfolio Optimization. International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting, 4(14), 111-126.
28. Gu, Q., & Qu, Q. (2022). Towards an Internet of Energy for smart and distributed generation: Applications, strategies, and challenges. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 9(5), 1789-1816.
29. Pourghader Chobar, A., Adibi, M. A., & Kazemi, A. (2021). A novel multi-objective model for hub location problem considering dynamic demand and environmental issues. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Studies, 8(1), 1-31.
30. Ho, T., Kumar, A., & Shiwakoti, N. (2020). Supply chain collaboration and performance: an empirical study of maturity model. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1-16.
31. Islam, M. R., Ali, S. M., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Kabir, G. (2021). A novel particle swarm optimization-based grey model for the prediction of warehouse performance. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 8(2), 705-727.
32. Kabirifar, K., Ashour, M., Yazdani, M., Mahdiyar, A., & Malekjafarian, M. (2023). Cybernetic-parsimonious MCDM modeling with application to the adoption of Circular Economy in waste management. Applied Soft Computing, 139, 110186.
33. Kayikci, Y., Kazancoglu, Y., Gozacan-Chase, N., Lafci, C., & Batista, L. (2022). Assessing smart circular supply chain readiness and maturity level of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 149, 375-392.
34. Toloie Ashlaghi, A., Daneshvar, A., Pourghader Chobar, A., & Salahi, F. (2024). Providing a multi-objective sustainable distribution network of agricultural items considering uncertainty and time window using meta-heuristic algorithms. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 36(1), 55.
35. Li, R. J. (1999). Fuzzy method in group decision making. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 38(1), 91-101.
36. Mahdiyar, A., Tabatabaee, S., Durdyev, S., Ismail, S., Abdullah, A., & Rani, W. N. M. W. M. (2019). A prototype decision support system for green roof type selection: A cybernetic fuzzy ANP method. Sustainable cities and society, 48, 101532.
37. Mendes Jr, P., Leal, J. E., & Thomé, A. M. T. (2016). A maturity model for demand-driven supply chains in the consumer product goods industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 179, 153-165.
38. Meng, X., Sun, M., & Jones, M. (2011). Maturity model for supply chain relationships in construction. Journal of management in engineering, 27(2), 97-105.
39. Mohandes, S. R., Sadeghi, H., Fazeli, A., Mahdiyar, A., Hosseini, M. R., Arashpour, M., & Zayed, T. (2022). Causal analysis of accidents on construction sites: A hybrid fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL approach. Safety science, 151, 105730.
40. Murugan, M., & Marisamynathan, S. (2022). Analysis of barriers to adopt electric vehicles in India using fuzzy DEMATEL and Relative importance Index approaches. Case studies on transport policy, 10(2), 795-810.
41. Delshad, M. M., Chobar, A. P., Ghasemi, P., & Jafari, D. (2024). Efficient Humanitarian Logistics: Multi-Commodity Location–Inventory Model Incorporating Demand Probability and Consumption Coefficients. Logistics, 8(1), 9.
42. Özdemir, A., & Tüysüz, F. (2017). An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP based balanced scorecard approach: application in Turkish higher education institutions. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 28.
43. Pejić Bach, M., Klinčar, A., Aleksić, A., Rašić Jelavić, S., & Zeqiri, J. (2023). Supply chain management maturity and business performance: the balanced scorecard perspective. Applied Sciences, 13(4), 2065.
44. Peña Orozco, D. L., Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Rivera, L., & Mejía Ramirez, C. A. (2021). Integration maturity analysis for a small citrus producers' supply chain in a developing country. Business Process Management Journal, 27(3), 836-867.
45. Priyanka, R., Ravindran, K., Sankaranarayanan, B., & Ali, S. M. (2023). A fuzzy DEMATEL decision modeling framework for identifying key human resources challenges in start-up companies: Implications for sustainable development. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100192.
46. Petrudi, S. H. H., Ghomi, H., & Mazaheriasad, M. (2022). An Integrated Fuzzy Delphi and Best Worst Method (BWM) for performance measurement in higher education. Decision Analytics Journal, 4, 100121.
47. Radosavljevic, M., Barac, N., Jankovic-Milic, V., & Andjelkovic, A. (2016). Supply chain management maturity assessment: challenges of the enterprises in Serbia. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(6), 848-864.
48. Rahmaty, M., Daneshvar, A., Salahi, F., Ebrahimi, M., & Chobar, A. P. (2022). Customer churn modeling via the grey wolf optimizer and ensemble neural networks. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022(1), 9390768.
49. Reefke, H., Ahmed, M. D., & Sundaram, D. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management—Decision making and support: The SSCM maturity model and system. Global Business Review, 15(4_suppl), 1S-12S.
50. Roque Júnior, L. C. R., Frederico, G. F., & Costa, M. L. (2019). Supply chain management maturity and complexity: findings from a case study at a health biotechnology company in Brazil. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 33(1), 1-25.
51. Chobar, A. P., Adibi, M. A., & Kazemi, A. (2022). Multi-objective hub-spoke network design of perishable tourism products using combination machine learning and meta-heuristic algorithms. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-28.
52. Iraj, M., Chobar, A. P., Peivandizadeh, A., & Abolghasemian, M. (2024). Presenting a two-echelon multi-objective supply chain model considering the expiration date of products and solving it by applying MODM. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 3, 100022.
53. Soares, G. P., Tortorella, G., Bouzon, M., & Tavana, M. (2021). A fuzzy maturity-based method for lean supply chain management assessment. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12(5), 1017-1045.
54. Souza, R. P., Guerreiro, R., & Oliveira, M. P. V. (2015). Relationship between the maturity of supply chain process management and the organisational life cycle. Business Process Management Journal, 21(3), 466-481.
55. Uygun, Ö., Kaçamak, H., & Kahraman, Ü. A. (2015). An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 86, 137-146.
56. Varoutsa, E., & Scapens, R. W. (2015). The governance of inter-organisational relationships during different supply chain maturity phases. Industrial Marketing Management, 46, 68-82.
57. Ward, M., Halliday, S., Uflewska, O., & Wong, T. C. (2018). Three dimensions of maturity required to achieve future state, technology-enabled manufacturing supply chains. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 232(4), 605-620.
58. Wu, C. H., & Fang, W. C. (2011). Combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Delphi method for developing critical competences of electronic commerce professional managers. Quality & Quantity, 45, 751-768.
59. Yilmaz, I., Erdebilli, B., Naji, M. A., & Mousrij, A. (2023). A Fuzzy DEMATEL framework for maintenance performance improvement: A case of Moroccan Chemical Industry. Journal of Engineering Research, 11(1), 100019.
60. Zhang, Z. X., Wang, L., Wang, Y. M., & Martínez, L. (2023). A novel alpha-level sets based fuzzy DEMATEL method considering experts’ hesitant information. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, 118925.
