The Judiciary and Justice Administration as authority dealing with litigations and complaints (against justice) of people and authority for dealing with people’s legal and criminal complaints and disputes has a very important position in Iranian legal system simil More
The Judiciary and Justice Administration as authority dealing with litigations and complaints (against justice) of people and authority for dealing with people’s legal and criminal complaints and disputes has a very important position in Iranian legal system similar to the most countries and benefitting from justly, independent proceeding system and competent justice along with criteria and norms of human rights for dealing with litigations will realize justly proceeding and judicial justice. For this purpose, main object of the judiciary is preserving the judicial independence and attention to legal fundamentals and principles in procedural law based on impartiality principle that sometimes faces problems as executor of justice for justifying its performance, actions, plans and programs as well as execution of judgments of accused, in media space-makings.
In this connection, essentially, this question is propounded that “if media and press affects independence of the judiciary and enforcement of judgments based on justice?” For its prediction, data was collected based on descriptive-analytical method using library references as noting. Results indicated that damaging the judicial independence and judging in some cases is made by media space-makings.
Manuscript profile
In the system of separation of powers, supervision over the proper implementation of laws is the responsibility of the judiciary that it takes adventage of a wide variety of the roles and responsibilities. the judiciary will meet its norm’s requirements through th More
In the system of separation of powers, supervision over the proper implementation of laws is the responsibility of the judiciary that it takes adventage of a wide variety of the roles and responsibilities. the judiciary will meet its norm’s requirements through the provision of judicial bills and approval by the legislature. But with regard to specialized or minor needs, it adeguate itself competent to normalization the second level and has taken action while the legislature is the reference legislative and there is no specifying for the normative jurisdiction of the judiciary. In the research to identify the bases of ordinary qualifications by the head of the judiciary, we tried to base this competence as well as its limits in law and sharia with descriptive method and data collection were tried in the library method and it was found that such norms did not contradict sharia and law, the principles and principles of the law, including the separation of powers, the legal state, the hierarchy of norms, the principle of specialty and necessity, also confirm the prescription and strengthening of the normative authority of the head of the judiciary. Therefore, it was suggested that a specialized normative council be established in the judiciary and the limits of its authority and jurisdiction, together with the process of monitoring norms and the possibility of their evaluation, correction and revocation are specified in the law.
Manuscript profile
Objective: The Purpose of this Survey is to analyze the rate of the usage of Judges from electronic and printed sources in Tehran Judiciary Libraries. It is intending to find the reasons and effective factors of Judges usage in these Libraries. More
Objective: The Purpose of this Survey is to analyze the rate of the usage of Judges from electronic and printed sources in Tehran Judiciary Libraries. It is intending to find the reasons and effective factors of Judges usage in these Libraries.
Methodology: The method used is a kind of descriptive through gathering device of data, questionnaire is used, and 220 Tehran Judges have been surveyed . The analysis of data was done by statistical software spss.
Findings: Judges use the libraries significantly (R =0.05) to increase and improve the quality of their jobs and knowledge . 30.5% of them use books and 31.4% use magazines only once a month. Results indicates that They don’t use thesis and electronic sources , they also use law data bases very little. 61.4% of them gain their needful information by referring to the books available in offices . Using internet, purchasing book, subscribing special low journal are other ways of having access to the information. The main reasons of the shortage of printed and electronic sources are inaccessibility ,the lack of time and lake of knowledge about resources. Consequently, there is a relation between the rate of the usage of Judges and improving the quality of their jobs. So the hypothesis of research is approved.
Conclusion: based on the findings in this Survey, Judges need to use libraries more in order to improve the quality of their jobs . using books and journals are in the first place among the statistical community, but unfortunately using Electronic sources are not in an ideal situation. shortage of Libraries, lack of hardware and soft ware equipments , not being informed enough by available libraries and also lack of time are the main reasons .To improve this situation some suggestions have been offered.
Manuscript profile
This paper is a study of the impact of the decisions made by the judiciary, legislative and executive systems on the solvency of insurance companies with regard to third-party life insurance in the year 2014. Its purpose is utilization-oriented and the method used is a More
This paper is a study of the impact of the decisions made by the judiciary, legislative and executive systems on the solvency of insurance companies with regard to third-party life insurance in the year 2014. Its purpose is utilization-oriented and the method used is a descriptive survey. The statistical population included experts and managers of insurance industry that with the use of Cochran test, 150 out of 260 people were selected. Research method is simple random sampling. For the purpose of studying and investigating the impact of decisions made by the judiciary, legislative and executive systems on the solvency of insurance companies with regard to third- party life insurance, a researcher-made questionnaire with 6 topics and 15 items applying 5-point Likert scale was used. Using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, the reliability of the questionnaire was assessed %87 which indicated the adequacy of measurement tools and methods. After collecting data, the SPSS software was used for both descriptive and inferential analyses. The results indicated that setting the upper limits of insurer’s obligations (setting and notifying the amount of blood cost) by judiciary system, interpreting the laws by judges in the process of probing litigations of policyholders and insurance companies, lengthy and slow process of courts, changing and determining of the insurance regulations by legislative system, setting the upper limits of insurance premium and the policies of executive system concerning insurance, contracts and losses paid have great effects on the solvency of insurance companies with regard to third- party life insurance. Nevertheless, charges and tolls imposed by legislative system has no tangible effect on the solvency of insurance companies with regard to third- party life insurance.
Manuscript profile
Sanad
Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications
