• Home
  • Sheikh Ansari
    • List of Articles Sheikh Ansari

      • Open Access Article

        1 - A Critique and Analysis of the Arguments of Believers in Hurmat and Permissibility of News from the Celestial Rulings
        Mohammad Danesh Nahad (Corresponding author) Mohammad Hassan Vakili
        One of the important topics in Islamic jurisprudence is identifying the obligation of Tanjim (belief in the effect of the state of the constellations and the movement of stars in human life and terrestrial events). Most jurists have considered Tanjim as haram, but More
        One of the important topics in Islamic jurisprudence is identifying the obligation of Tanjim (belief in the effect of the state of the constellations and the movement of stars in human life and terrestrial events). Most jurists have considered Tanjim as haram, but such a ruling has fundamental problems and it is not the absolute argument for its hurmat (being haram). Not having a correct view of Tanjim leads to the issuance of an incorrect religious ruling. Accordingly, some have considered news of celestial rulings as haram (forbidden) and some as permissible. Those who consider Tanjim as haram, whose main reason is disbelief, have not paid attention to independent and non-independent causes, and this has caused their rulings regarding Tanjim to be insufficiently thorough. This study, with the library method, information analysis and comparison of opinions, looks for the problems in the absolute hurmat of Tanjim and to prove Tanjim as not being haram considering independent and non-independent causes. Because the non-independent reference of events to the heavens does not require any polytheism. the effects of these matters in the ruling of Tanjim has not been considered by researchers. Therefore, first the concept of tanjim is explained and after that, the ruling of news about celestial conditions rulings is examined to finally be able to examine the arguments for its hurmat and permissibility of the news of the celestial rulings in detail, or to reach the correct viewpoint. The findings include these items 1. Definite news of celestial rulings or belief in the influence of the stars is permissible, and this can not lead to disbelief and polytheism. 2. What causes the hurmat of Tanjim is the reference to an independent relation to the heavens, but non-independent reference does not have any corrupt consequences. 3. The arguments of the jurists on the hurmat of Tanjim is not absolutely complete. Manuscript profile