List of Articles Personal jurisdiction

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - A Review on the Basics of Rejection of Judge in Imamiyeh Figh with a look at International Document
  Parvin Akbarineh Behnam Amirshakeri Ali GHaribeh Mohamad Taghi
  10.30495/jijl.2022.67302.1541
  In 0rder to hearing any case based on the rules of jurisdiction, aside from the fact that the judicial authority must has jurisdiction to hear the case, a judge who is refereed by the authority should also have personal jurisdiction to hear the same case on the basis of More

  In 0rder to hearing any case based on the rules of jurisdiction, aside from the fact that the judicial authority must has jurisdiction to hear the case, a judge who is refereed by the authority should also have personal jurisdiction to hear the same case on the basis of rules of judgement. Independence and observance of the principle of neutrality have been bases of rejection to the judge, guaranteed principle of just judgement, and has been dealt with in the branches of civil, criminal and administrative judgement. In the Islamic era, judges were appointed by the head of government that is khalifa. In this era, except for certain points of the history and rulings of some king, law in Iran has been based on jurisprudence; so, regarding the legal shortcomings, in addition to study just jurisprudential books, it is necessary also to consider principles and rules of transnational procedure cod. As well as, that how the issue of rejection to judge is raised in Islamic jurisprudence, in the principles of international judgment, and in the direction of globalization, and which appropriate guarantees are mentioned and anticipated in line of just judgment can create the context of correction and somewhat compensate void caused by the lack of judgement code. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Causes of Refusing to Accept the Validity of Foreign Judgments about Tazirat in Iran's Law
  Abolhassan Shakeri farshad shirzadifar
  According to clause 2 of article 115 of the Islamic penal code adopted in 2013, if a person commits a crime abroad, those laws that stipulate sentences for Tazir offences, they should be just as responsible for the crime as if they committed it in their sponsor nation a More

  According to clause 2 of article 115 of the Islamic penal code adopted in 2013, if a person commits a crime abroad, those laws that stipulate sentences for Tazir offences, they should be just as responsible for the crime as if they committed it in their sponsor nation and under Iran's Islamic penal code, he may be prosecuted, tried and punished for their crimes even if he is sentenced to be punished on that country. Specific punishments has been prescribed in Islamic law for a discretionary punishments such as male homosexuality (article 237 of the Islamic penal code), admitting to adultery (article 232 of the Islamic penal code) if a man or woman confesses to adultery less than four times. Clause 2 of article 115 of the judgment is contrary to the prohibition against double punishment and needed to be interpreted cautiously. If an Iranian person who is non-Muslim commits a crime outside of Iran which is considered to be as Ta’azirat penalties on that country he shall not be sentenced to Ta’zirat punishment if he has borne the punishment. Similarly, if a person who aids and abets in a discretionary crime outside of Iran, he shall not be sentenced to Ta’zirat punishment if he has borne the punishment on that country. Manuscript profile