List of Articles Ibn Yamin

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Analyzing and adapting the narrative structure of Ibn Yamin Faryoumdi's pieces and the sonnet of Arash Azarpik's pieces based on Grimas' action model
  zeynab noroozali niloufar masih
  10.30495/clq.2023.1986461.2561
  Many critics, including the Paris school, have studied the structures and narrative forms and examined the elements and rules of their composition. Among others, we can mention the model of Grimas, who, by inventing a system based on the representation of shapes for nar More

  Many critics, including the Paris school, have studied the structures and narrative forms and examined the elements and rules of their composition. Among others, we can mention the model of Grimas, who, by inventing a system based on the representation of shapes for narration, proposes a plan based on how the relationships between units are. Semantics of the school of Paris and Grimas believe that reality is always elusive and the external factors involved in the emergence of the narrative and its real roots are always ambiguous. Therefore, narration is a kind of simulation of reality. In this article, which was done in a descriptive and analytical way and using library sources; By comparing Ibn Yamin's pieces and Arash Azarpik's works based on the action model of Grimas, he tries to answer the question of what kind of relationship (imitationist, revivalist, innovative, heretical, transcendentalist) exists between the works of these two. In fact, the purpose of this research is to investigate the degree of adaptation and understanding as much as possible to the pieces of Ibn Yamin and Arash Azarpik and to recognize the pattern of grimace, and it concludes that the narrative structure of Arash Azarpik's pieces is innovative compared to Ibn Yamin. Manuscript profile