• List of Articles کیانی

      • Open Access Article

        1 - Research in Kianian Mythological and Historical Foundations
        Manizheh Fallahi Malek Mohammad Farokhzad Abbas Ali Vafaei
        In the present age, which is the era of the rule of history and historicism, the question of identifying the mythical time and historical foundations is a concern for research.Particularly, in Iranian studies,  pinpointing the border between myth and history of the More
        In the present age, which is the era of the rule of history and historicism, the question of identifying the mythical time and historical foundations is a concern for research.Particularly, in Iranian studies,  pinpointing the border between myth and history of the national epic is arduous.For the first time, Bertles  stated about the three distinct parts of  Shahnameh with mythical , historical and athletic titles. According to this view,the age of Pishdadian era is mythical, but scholars disagree on the era of Kianyan. The existence of mythical elements in the stories of Kianyan dynasty raises the question of whether the Kianyan kings have historical characters or belong to legends and myths. In response to this question, scholars such as Windschmall and Spiegel and Darmstadt and Lommel and wikander and Dozmil have a mythical view that  Kianyan or some of the kings of this dynasty are mythical.The existence of marvelous elements in the story of Kikavus and Kikhosro is the basis of this thinking. Another group of historians  such as Henning and Mary Boevis and Chrirstensen, consider Kianyan  kings the kings of East Iran to have ruled in the historical period before Achaemenids appierance and attendance Zoroaster in the kingdom goshtasp is the basis of this thinking In the present research, the views, arguments and evidence of these two groups of researchers have been criticized.The results of this study show that historians' theory is more reliable and closer to reality. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - Research on the Geographical Sovereignty of Kayānian Kings and Shahnameh
        Malek Mohammad Farrokhzad Manizhe Fallahi
        Zamyad Yašt, aka Kayān Yašt, as the nineteenth Yašt of Avesta is considered the most important document in the ethnographic researches of the geographical foundation of the history of Iran. According to this Yašt, the kingdom of the Kayānian More
        Zamyad Yašt, aka Kayān Yašt, as the nineteenth Yašt of Avesta is considered the most important document in the ethnographic researches of the geographical foundation of the history of Iran. According to this Yašt, the kingdom of the Kayānian kings (Kay Ghobad, Kay Kavus, Kay Kosrow, Kay Lohrasb, and Kay Goštāsp) and their successful sovereignty is bound to the river banks leading to Hirmand River and running to Kiansiyeh (Hamoon) in Sistan. Other evidences – such as Zoroaster’s living during Kay Goštāsp’s sovereignty in eastern Persia (or Balkh) and certain congruity between the Gash and the northeasterners’ language, as well as the establishment of Kayānian kings (Kay Kavus, Kiani Kings and Kay Lohrasb) in Balkh according to Islamic period historians  and stories of Shahnameh, traditions and monuments like the Gang Dezh in Turan built by Siavash, and the fireplace building at Sistan by Kay Kosrow – attest that the geographical borders wherein the word Kay – relating to the territory for the kingdom of  Kayānian – was used stretches from the farthest parts of  the northeast  to the southeast of Sistan. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        3 - An investigation of Farrah kiani ascension in ancient Iranian culture and describtion the kianian dynasty
        sara seyed khalilollahi mohsen abolghasemi
        Farrah is a symbol of divine power and glory of god as light and celestial gift which is entrusted in the presence of any human being and for the owner have delivered long life power and assets. Kavaem Farrah means royal splendor and belonged to the late Zoroaster legen More
        Farrah is a symbol of divine power and glory of god as light and celestial gift which is entrusted in the presence of any human being and for the owner have delivered long life power and assets. Kavaem Farrah means royal splendor and belonged to the late Zoroaster legendary timepiece. In more conceptual abstraction as a thought, Farrah can be a force depend on existence or force of god which is arising from the subtle world and going in this world so it will do good things and good fortune is also guaranteed. Whatever in this research has been investigated with analytical and descriptive methods are: the concept of term "Farrah" in Persian and Avestan , the reasons of kavaem Farrah importance, summaries about kianian series, Iranian myth which Farrah is hero of that and national stories associated with it, kavaem Farrah material and spiritual figures and recovered archaeological about Farrah, so finally answered to this question: what is the reasons of Kavaem Farrah special position and is it possible national stories and kavaem Farrah linked with each other or not? Research results shows that with investigation in the Avestan Zamyad Yasht text we can easily understand kavaem Farrah has such an importance situation based on nominal, historical, geographical, religion, and religious, national , mythical reasons. Also main heroes of some national Iranian pleasant stories has been benefited of kavaem Farrah and some things that great Ferdowsi has expressed in Shahname have roots in Avestan Zamyad yasht. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        4 - Critique of the lineage and titles of Malek Mahmoud Kiani Sistani
        Naser Chari Feizollah Boushasb Gousheh Mohammad karim Yousef Jamali Soheila Torabi Farsani
        Malek Mahmoud Sistani (Kiani) is one of the princes of Sistan who reached Mashhad in 1135 AH/ 1722 AD following the domination of Mahmoud Qaljaei over Isfahan. In order to gain legitimacy, he traces the roots of his family to the Saffarid dynasty and through them to the More
        Malek Mahmoud Sistani (Kiani) is one of the princes of Sistan who reached Mashhad in 1135 AH/ 1722 AD following the domination of Mahmoud Qaljaei over Isfahan. In order to gain legitimacy, he traces the roots of his family to the Saffarid dynasty and through them to the Sassanids, and then to the ancient and mythical Kianians through their lineage; A claim that was almost accepted at that time. The present study is dedicated to criticizing the authenticity of this claim and also determining the date of application of the title “property” to this family. The research question is presented as follows: what were the factors and reasons for attributing King Mahmoud Sistani to the Sassanids and Kianians? In response, the hypothesis was stated that the mythical or historical roots of the presence of the Kiani kings and the heroes of the Shahnameh in the Sistan region, and the existence of historical sources in confirmation of this issue, have given rise to such an idea. The research findings, which are based on the description and analysis of data and the application of historical research methods, indicate that the genealogy of this family has been supported and sometimes questioned by various historical sources over the years. Paying attention to the non-attribution of the Sassanids to the Kianians based on post-Saffavid sources makes it clear that this claim can be discussed until attributed to the Sassanids. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        5 - The Structure of the Story of “Kay Kāvus flying to Heaven”
        Masoomeh Baqerī Sahar Rstegārī Nejad
        In Avestan, Kay Kāvus or Kauui Usan is introduced as great and the most glorious king of Kayanian dynasty. He has divine royal glory (khvarenah or farre izadi) which gives him special features. One of these features is “flying to heaven” and companionship wi More
        In Avestan, Kay Kāvus or Kauui Usan is introduced as great and the most glorious king of Kayanian dynasty. He has divine royal glory (khvarenah or farre izadi) which gives him special features. One of these features is “flying to heaven” and companionship with Ahura Mazda. But in the passage of time, the myth of Kay Kāvus has changed. He has fallen from his high state and has turned into an idiot king that kills his son, Seyāvash; His flying to heaven is interpreted as invading the divine territory and wishing to conquer heavens. The present article, after presenting the myth of Kay Kāvus, tries to consider the reasons of his “flight to heaven” and change in the myth. Then, the original structure of the story will be revealed by displacing some of couplets of the story in Shānāmeh. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        6 - An Analysis of Relationship between Iran and Aliens in Kianian Period on the base of Ferdowsi's Shahnama
        Elham Hoseinkhaani Seyed Javad Emamjomehzadeh
        Iran is an ancient land and its beginning is back to prehistory. Iran's beginning creation remaining in myths and epics of it, and from the way of Shahnama has been transmitted to us. Formation an ancient land as a country whit a Kingdom, causes relationship whit people More
        Iran is an ancient land and its beginning is back to prehistory. Iran's beginning creation remaining in myths and epics of it, and from the way of Shahnama has been transmitted to us. Formation an ancient land as a country whit a Kingdom, causes relationship whit peoples of neighbor lands and their kingdoms as aliens. This relations, create in two ways of war and peace, and their subcategories This article on the base of Shahnama trying to shows Iran's kingdom policy against the aliens on the base of the discourse of Persepolis political thought, and the empirical process of relationship between Iran and aliens in Kianian kingdom periods (Keikobad, Keikavous and Keikhosro). The method of research is discourse analysis. As the overall result, totality of this relations show that creation and keeping of country that is called Iran, Separating and creating the border between it and the aliens, and its security, is on the base of the principle of survival. Manuscript profile