Much has been said in discussions concerning literary criticism fromthe position of the writer and the reader deciding the type of theexisting readings and claims in criticisms. But the problem is that theidentity of the writers and readers of various texts are not prec More
Much has been said in discussions concerning literary criticism fromthe position of the writer and the reader deciding the type of theexisting readings and claims in criticisms. But the problem is that theidentity of the writers and readers of various texts are not preciselydefinite and determined in a way we could be able to establish ourcritic claims. How could we deal with such a problem and what mightbe the solution to it? The concepts such as “the real individual”,“typical individual” and the broader concept of “the logic of situation”have been applied here to find a solution to this problem and all thesediscussions have become an introduction to Roland Barth's “the deathof the writer” theory. And here Roland Barth's viewpoints can bechallenged. A study of Barth's theory according to the concept of “thelogic of situation” can lead us to results contradictory with those ofBarth's. In fact, the work done here in this article is that the theory of 'the death of the writer' has been applied to that theory itself; that is, theconsequences of Barth's theory have been studied independent from hisown intentions.
Manuscript profile
This research is conducted with the purpose of citation assessment and analysis of comparative literature journal during 2007-2013. The results show that this journal within the years under study (7 years), published 262 articles in 28 issues. The collaboration of resea More
This research is conducted with the purpose of citation assessment and analysis of comparative literature journal during 2007-2013. The results show that this journal within the years under study (7 years), published 262 articles in 28 issues. The collaboration of researchers shows that within these seven years 51.15% of articles had just one author. In other words, in the first four years, the scientific collaboration of authors had been weak and the majority of articles were single-authored ones. However, over the last three years authors have tended towards collaborative writing and coauthoring. This research shows that Mehdi Momtahen with 22 articles is introduced as the most prolific author. Also Islamic azad university of Jiroft branch with 46 articles is ranked as the most prolific university. Books form 90% of research sources of the authors of this journal and about 71% of research sources of this journal has been in Persian language.
Manuscript profile
As a dominant tradition in writing, postmodernism was widely embraced during mid and late twentieth century. Many contemporary authors, and in particular some British authors, deemed postmodernism as alien to their own traditional modes of writing. Julian Barnes, the co More
As a dominant tradition in writing, postmodernism was widely embraced during mid and late twentieth century. Many contemporary authors, and in particular some British authors, deemed postmodernism as alien to their own traditional modes of writing. Julian Barnes, the contemporary British author who once hailed postmodernism in his writings critically challenged and opposed it. The present research is an attempt to critically and analytically investigate this shift from his postmodern work Flaubert Parrot, to his more recent neo-realistic work The Only Story through the lens of Jacques Ranciere. The main hypothesis is that the late Barnes has truly grasped the dynamic of author-subject as indicated in his return to neo-realism from Postmodern grand narrative. To accomplish this goal the researchers have employed some of Ranciere’s concepts including ‘politics of aesthetics,’ ‘regimes of art,’ ‘distribution and redistribution of sensible’ to scrutinize the causes of this shift and his return to more essentialist and humanistic modes of thought and writing
Manuscript profile
هدف این تحقیق این بود که نشان دهد چگونه نویسندگان علمی تازه کار و ماهر مواضع خود را در بخش مقدمه مقالات تحقیقی و پایاننامه ها نشان میدهند. بنابراین، منابع تعامل متنی بر اساس سیستم ارزشگذاری (مارتین و وایت، 2005) در بخش مقدمه 30 مقاله از نویسندگان ماهر More
هدف این تحقیق این بود که نشان دهد چگونه نویسندگان علمی تازه کار و ماهر مواضع خود را در بخش مقدمه مقالات تحقیقی و پایاننامه ها نشان میدهند. بنابراین، منابع تعامل متنی بر اساس سیستم ارزشگذاری (مارتین و وایت، 2005) در بخش مقدمه 30 مقاله از نویسندگان ماهر و 30بخش مقدمه پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد از نویسندگاه علمی نوآموز ایرانی در رشته زبانشناسی کاربردی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. از طریق تحلیل آزمون نمونه‌های زوجی t معلوم گردید که میانگین وقوع عناصر چند صدایی در هر دو پیکره زبانی بیشتر از عناصر تک صداییمیباشد که نشانده آگاهی هر دو گروه از نویسندگان برای "تعامل" با مواضع دیگر در بخش مقدمه است. نتایج همچنین نشان داد که عناصر بسیط بر عناصر انقباضی در هر دو گروه ترجیح داده شده است ، و این نشان دهنده احترام هر دو گروه نویسندگان به مواضع جایگزین است نه انکا احتمال هر دیدگاه و موضع گیری های مختلف. بعلاوه ، برخلاف نویسندگان دانشگاهی تازه کار که از ویژگیهای نسبت دهی بیشتری نسبت به عناصر پذیرش در بخشهای مقدمه پایاننامه های کارشناسی ارشد خود استفاده می کردند ، نویسندگان دانشگاهی ماهر تعداد متعادلی از نسبت دهی و عناصر پذیرش را در بخشهای مقدمه مقالات پژوهشی خود به کار میگیرند. استفاده متعادل از ویژگیهای پذیرش و نسبت دهی در بخش مقدمه مقالات توسط نویسندگان ماهر ممکن است از ویژگیهای ادب نویسندگان باشد که معمولاً به عنوان یک ویژگی اساسی در نوشتار دانشگاهی پذیرفته می شود سرانجام ، از طریق تجزیه و تحلیل کیفی ، نشان داده شد که نویسندگان کارشناسی ارشد به عنوان نویسندگان دانشگاهی تازه کار از فقدان موضع ارزیابی مناسب رنج می برند.
Manuscript profile
According to the post-structuralist approach to textual analysis, any literary text has multiple meanings, and that the author is not the prime source of the work's semantic content. It rejects the idea of a literary text having a single purpose, a single meanin More
According to the post-structuralist approach to textual analysis, any literary text has multiple meanings, and that the author is not the prime source of the work's semantic content. It rejects the idea of a literary text having a single purpose, a single meaning, or one singular existence. Instead, every individual reader creates a new and individual purpose, meaning, and existence for a given text.
In the present article, attempt is made to show it is a viable possibility to explain Hafez's poetry in post-structuraist context.
Manuscript profile
