One of the important topics in Islamic jurisprudence is identifying the obligation of Tanjim (belief in the effect of the state of the constellations and the movement of stars in human life and terrestrial events). Most jurists have considered Tanjim as haram, but More
One of the important topics in Islamic jurisprudence is identifying the obligation of Tanjim (belief in the effect of the state of the constellations and the movement of stars in human life and terrestrial events). Most jurists have considered Tanjim as haram, but such a ruling has fundamental problems and it is not the absolute argument for its hurmat (being haram). Not having a correct view of Tanjim leads to the issuance of an incorrect religious ruling. Accordingly, some have considered news of celestial rulings as haram (forbidden) and some as permissible. Those who consider Tanjim as haram, whose main reason is disbelief, have not paid attention to independent and non-independent causes, and this has caused their rulings regarding Tanjim to be insufficiently thorough. This study, with the library method, information analysis and comparison of opinions, looks for the problems in the absolute hurmat of Tanjim and to prove Tanjim as not being haram considering independent and non-independent causes. Because the non-independent reference of events to the heavens does not require any polytheism. the effects of these matters in the ruling of Tanjim has not been considered by researchers. Therefore, first the concept of tanjim is explained and after that, the ruling of news about celestial conditions rulings is examined to finally be able to examine the arguments for its hurmat and permissibility of the news of the celestial rulings in detail, or to reach the correct viewpoint. The findings include these items 1. Definite news of celestial rulings or belief in the influence of the stars is permissible, and this can not lead to disbelief and polytheism. 2. What causes the hurmat of Tanjim is the reference to an independent relation to the heavens, but non-independent reference does not have any corrupt consequences. 3. The arguments of the jurists on the hurmat of Tanjim is not absolutely complete.
Manuscript profile
The role of man in his actions is one of the important theological and interpretive issues, that is, does man have the power of choice in his actions or is he forced by the divine will and his will has no role in performing actions? Fakhr Razi, a great philosopher, theo More
The role of man in his actions is one of the important theological and interpretive issues, that is, does man have the power of choice in his actions or is he forced by the divine will and his will has no role in performing actions? Fakhr Razi, a great philosopher, theologian and commentator of the sixth and seventh centuries, considers human actions as God's creation and believes that man has no authority in performing his actions, and considers man's will and authority to be contrary to monotheism in creation and lordship. He considers the eternal knowledge and divine scope as the cause of the coerciveness of actions and states that just as God is the creator of man, so he is the creator of his actions. In a descriptive-analytical method, the author explores the views of Fakhr and considers his theory to be in conflict with the verses of the Qur'an and the principle of causality. Other results of this research include the cross-sectional relationship between the creation of God and man and the explanation of the relationship between the recording of human deeds in Ommolketab and the coercion of human beings.
Manuscript profile
Although freedom and slavery are opposite concepts, they have real connection with each other in Islamic mysticism. Freedom and slavery have degrees and in any degree of devotee’s travelling and behavior, he achieves a portion of it and at the end finds out the re More
Although freedom and slavery are opposite concepts, they have real connection with each other in Islamic mysticism. Freedom and slavery have degrees and in any degree of devotee’s travelling and behavior, he achieves a portion of it and at the end finds out the real concept of slavery and freedom. Hafez states this in his Divan clearly and indicates that freedom is the result of true slavery manifestation. Hafez belives that there is just one way of slavery. He named it ‘lovely slavery’ which gives freedom to man. A Lover is a free man that releases himself from all limitations by slavery and becomes a free slave. This article examins some of sufia and mystic beliefs in terms of mental bases of connection between freedom and slavery in Islamic mysticism, it also studies lovely slavery concept, degrees of it and its relation with freedom from Hafez’s point of view.
Manuscript profile
Sanad
Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications
