Unit notice, as one possible reason, has been considered from two main aspects in the language of principles. One is the proof of its validity, and the other is the determination of its domain which acceptance of validity is supposed to be more More
Unit notice, as one possible reason, has been considered from two main aspects in the language of principles. One is the proof of its validity, and the other is the determination of its domain which acceptance of validity is supposed to be more important. Referring to the arguments of the Arbaa reasons as well as the methods of wise men, the scholars of the principles have argued against the theory that does not fully consider the unit notice as valid and as the trigger of notice and practice. Meanwhile, some have fully understood the implication of the verses on this issue and faced the challenges of method of wise men with the drawback of retribution by the lawyer. On the other hand, some have considered the method of the wise men as the only reason for the validity of the unit notice, and by attaching related narratives as validity from the lawyer have tried to prove the authority of unit notice. Some others, while accepting the implications of the verse of Al-Naba Surah, have considered the method of wise men as one of the reasons for the authority of the unit notice. In this paper, we will examine the integrity of the rationale for the validity of the unit notice through examining the principles and searching for the status of the wise men in proving the authority of the unit notice.
Manuscript profile
Ibn Idris was the only jurist of the sixth century who was able to pave the way for the presentation of new ideas and the evolution of Shiite jurisprudence by criticizing the views of his predecessors, especially Sheikh Tusi, and in the field of ijtihad and jurisprudenc More
Ibn Idris was the only jurist of the sixth century who was able to pave the way for the presentation of new ideas and the evolution of Shiite jurisprudence by criticizing the views of his predecessors, especially Sheikh Tusi, and in the field of ijtihad and jurisprudence he chose principles that gave his jurisprudence a special character. The book Al-Sara'ir Al-Hawi li-Tahrir al-Fatawi contains his fatwas and jurisprudential theories, some of which are notorious and contrary to the famous theories, but some of which are his own. Since the purpose of this study is to investigate the basics of and reasons behind Ibn Idris's differing opinions, examples of these views such as prayer in two suspicious clothes, vague confession, execution of the permissible limit, etc. have been explored. The descriptive-analytical method explains the basics, documents and their cause. Belief in the unreliability of the individualized hadith is one of the most important principles of Ibn Idris, which on the one hand, due to his principles and on the other hand in terms of the temporal dimension of the evidence, has caused the actions of the people before him to be hidden from his vision. This has led to a lack of reliance on a large part of the hadiths of the infallibles, and as a result, the individuality and rarity of his views
Manuscript profile
One of the crucial and controversial topics in the field of methodology and the basics of commentary is the authority of single news, and consequently, the authority of single news, which has a very long history, and several opinions has been brought up on it. According More
One of the crucial and controversial topics in the field of methodology and the basics of commentary is the authority of single news, and consequently, the authority of single news, which has a very long history, and several opinions has been brought up on it. According to having or not having authority of commentary, discussing on the authority of commentary single news can affect on the commentator’s base. Those who accept the authority of single news based on Naba’ verse and the wise’ way of life, more sources in commentary are available to them and have more potential for interpreting the verses than those who don’t accept the authority of single news. Generally, there are two opinions in the field of the authority of single news: in one opinion, they (for exampleIn his methodological and hadith jurisprudence, while accepting the authority of single news based on the wise sirah, Imam Khomeini have different opinions on the authority of commentary single news. Examining his opinions in methodology shows that his more inclination to lack of authority of this kind of traditions, although he applies the commentary traditions following mystical verses and issues.Keywords: authority, single news, commentary traditions, Imam Khomeini
Manuscript profile
In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In t More
In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God In the name of God
Manuscript profile
Sanad
Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications
