America's Strategic Challenges in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Identity

Subject Areas :

Zohreh Poustinchi ^{1 *}

1 - Associate Professor of Department of Political Science and International Relations, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Aazad University,Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2024-04-30 Accepted : 2024-08-13 Published : 2024-12-12

Keywords: identity, artificial intelligence, regional challenges, soft balance, chaotic geopolitics,

Abstract :

In the third decade of the 21st century, artificial intelligence and identity movements should be considered two of the main products of the evolution of world system technologies. Each of these two components produce a significant effect on political equations, power, and security of state actors. Whenever the world order is faced with the emergence of identity movements and technological transformations, it is inevitable that it will lead to structural changes. In tandem with identity crises, the ground for the emergence of a new wave of technological innovations has been prepared, affecting the politics of many countries. In the past decade, the concept of artificial intelligence as a strategic concern has been prioritized on the agenda of industrialized countries and regional actors. In his meeting with government officials in September 2024, the Islamic Republic’s Supreme Leader, Khamenei, emphasized the necessity of strengthening Iran's power in the field of artificial intelligence. The main question of this article is: What are the characteristics of artificial intelligence and what effect does it have on the equations of power, security, and identity of America in the region and international politics? While a data analysis approach is employed, the article argues that artificial intelligence will create a fundamental change in the equation of power and lead to the emergence of regional wars and geopolitical conflicts

References:

منابع
 اندرسون، تيم (1396)، «جنگ كثيف در سوريه؛‌ واشنگتن تغيير رژيم مقاومت»، ترجمه مهدي هدايتي شهيداني، رشت: انتشارات دانشگاه گيلان.
 روزنا، جیمز (1380)، «امنیت در جهان آشوب زده»، ترجمه علیرضا طیب، تهران: نشر نی.
 کاستلز، مانوئل (1380)، «عصر اطلاعات: قدرت هویت»، ترجمه حسن چاوشیان، تهران: طرح نو.
 كوهن، سائول، (1390)، ژئوپليتيك نظام جهاني، ترجمه علي‌محمد كاردان، تهران: انتشارات ابرار معاصر.
 مصلي‌نژاد، عباس، (1394)، سياستگذاري امنيت منطقه‌اي ناتو در مقابله با نشانه‌هاي آشوب‌ساز، فصلنامه ژئوپليتيك، دورة 11، شماره 37.

 Alan, John and David Ronfeldt (2003), “The Emergence of Nonpolitical: Towards an American Information Strategy”, Santa Monica CA: RAND.
 Bendett, S., (2019), “Putin Drops Hints about Upcoming National AI Strategy”, Defense One, 30 May.
 Berend, I.T., (2000), “The Failure of Economic Nationalism: Central and Eastern Europe before World War II”, Revue économique, vol.51, no.2, pp.315–22.
 Brzezinski, Zbigniew (1993), “Out of Control: Global Turmoil on the Eve of the Twerny- First Centuy”, New York: Macmillan.
 Department of Defense (2019), “Summary of the 2018 Department of Defense Artificial Intelligence Strategy: Harnessing AI to Advance Our Security and Prosperity”, US Department of Defense, 12 December.
 Diesen, G., (2020), ‘Towards an EU Strategy for Technological Sovereignty’, Valdai Discussion Club, 3 March.
 Kagan, Robert (2007), “Return of History”, Policy Review, No. 144, pp. 1-17.
 Lukin, A., (2018), China and Russia: The New Rapprochement, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
 MacCarthy, M., (2019), “Would Breaking Up Digital Platforms Enhance Free Speech?” Forbes, 19 June.
 Mearsheimer, J.J., (2009), ‘Reckless States and Realism’, International Relations, vol.23, no.2, pp.241–56.
 Murgia, M. and Yang, Y., (2019), “Microsoft Worked with Chinese Military University on Artificial Intelligence”, Financial Times, 10 May.
 Murphy, M., (2017), “Building the Hardware for the Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence”, MIT News, 30 November.
 Rifkin, J., (2016), “The 2016 World Economic Forum Misfires with Its Fourth Industrial Revolution Theme”, Industry Week, 15 January.
 Rodrik, D., (2018), “New Technologies, Global Value Chains, and the Developing Economies”, Pathways for Prosperity Commission Background Paper Series; No. 1.
 Rose, Gideon, (2017), “What's Inside; Present at the Destruction?”, Foreign Affairs, March & April.
 Sakwa, Richard, (2015), “EU and NATO Relations”, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
 Schwab, K., (2016), “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond”, in G. Rose (ed.), The Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Davos Reader, Foreign Affairs, 12 December, pp.3–11.
 Schwab, K., (2018), “Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution”, World Economic Forum, Geneva.
 Skolnikoff, E.B., (1994), “The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology and the Evolution of International Politics”, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
 Smith, N.R., (2018), ‘Can Neoclassical Realism Become a Genuine Theory of International Relations?’ The Journal of Politics, vol.80, no.2, pp.742–9.
 Stiglitz, J., (2019), “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent”, Penguin, London.
 Tepper, J., (2018), “The Myth of Capitalism: Monopolies and the Death of Competition”, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
 Walt, Stephen, (1987), the Origins of Alliance, New York: Cornell University Press.
 Waltz, Kenneth (1993), "The Emerging Structure of International Politics", International Security, Vol. 18, No. 2.
 Ward, S., (2012), “Neoliberalism and the Global Restructuring of Knowledge and Education”, Routledge Press, London.
 World Bank (2018), “Competing in the Digital Age: Policy Implications for the Russian Federation”, World Bank, September.