Clinical And Paraclinical Effects Of Urografin In Sheep
Subject Areas : Journal of Large Animal Clinical Science Research(JLACSR)
Keywords: Sheep, urografin, urinanalysis, urinary system, hematologic factor,
Abstract :
Six healthy female sheep aged about 2 years with average body weight of 37± 0.5 kg were selected for this study. Before experiments, vital signs were recorded. Blood and urine samples were collected prior to the trials and paraclinical examinations were performed. Urine samples were analysed for glucose, bilirubin, urobilinogen, blood, keton bodies, pH, ceratinine, spicific gravity and urine precipitation. Serum samples were analysed for ceratinine and blood uria nitrogen. Electrocardiographs were taken and then positive contrast cytography with the use of urografin 76% was performed on each animal. After 2 and 24 hours clinical parameters were recorded and urine samples were collected. Ventrodorsal abdominal radiographs were taken immediately and at 5, 20 and 40 minutes after injection of contrast media. In each case there was no significant difference between the clinical, urine, biochemical and haematologic parameters before, 2 and 24 hours following injection of urografin (P>0.05). Electrocardiographic findings showed no abnormality following injection of urografin. Radiographic findings showed that urografin had suitable and perfect contrast with no side effects for urinary system in small ruminant.
1- هاشمی راد، م و شش پلی، م. (1372): آزمایشهای ادراری در شناخت بیماریهای کلیه. موسسه انتشارات و چاپ دانشگاه تهران، صفحه: 42-40.
2 - Alex, C.,Sonnenwirth and et al.(1980): Grad Wohl`s Clinical Laboratory Methods and Diagnosis. 8th .ed.2 vols, pp:125-132.
3 - Aspelin, P.(1978):Effects of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on morphplpgy of human erythrocytes. Acta Radiologica.19,I:675-687.
4 - Bentley M.D., Vanhoutte B., Schryver S.M., Romero J.C. and Vanhoutte P.M. (1987):Conteraction of isolated canine renal arteries induced by the radiocontrast medium sodium diatrozoate and meglumine diatrozoate.J. Lab. Clin. Med. 109,I:595-600. 5 - Brady T.M., Singer D., Weiss C.A., Smolin M.F., Brinker R.E. and Cho K.J.(1982) : Angiograohic nephrectomy using iodinated contrast agent. Invest. Radiol. 17,I:479-485.
6-Chew D.J. and Dibartola S.(1989): Diagnosis and pathophysiology of renal disease.In Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. Edited by SJ Ettinger. 3rd .ed. W.B. Saunders Co.,Philadelphia, USA, pp:1893-1963.
7- Dawson P., Harrison M.J.G. and Weissblatt E.(1983): Effect of contrast media on red cell filterability and morphology. Br. J. Radiol. 56,I:707-710.
8 - Elia J.A., Gleason R.E., Alday M. and et al. (1981): Renal function angiographic contrast material: a Prosoective study. Am. J. Med. 72,I:719-725.
9 - Gillam L.D., Kaul S., Fallon J.T., Levine R.A., Hedley- whyte E.T., Guerrero J.L. and Weym A.E.(1985): Functional and Pathologic effects of multiple echocardiographic contrast injections on the myocardium, brain and kidney.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.6,I:687-694.
10- Ihle S.L. and Kostolich M.(1991): Acute renal failure associated with contrast medium administration in a dog. J. Am. Vet. Med.Assoc.I:899-901.
11 - Jacobson E.D., Eldon C. and Fondacaro J.D.(1980): Effects of a rapid injection into the canine superior mesenteric artery of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium (Renografin-76).Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 3,I:159-162.
12 - Katzberg R.W., Morris T.W., Lasser E.C., Dimarco P.L., Merguerian P., Ventura J.A., Pabico R.C. and Mckenna B.A.(1986):Acute Systemic and renal hemodynamic effects of meglumine/ sodium diatrizoate 76% and iopamidal in euvolmic and dehydrated dogs. Invest. Radiol. 21,I:793-797.
13 - Katzberg R.W., Pabico R.C., Morris T.W., Hayakawa K., Mckenna B., panner B.J., Ventura J.A. and Fischer H.W.(1986): Effects of contrast media on renal function and subcellular morphology in the dog. Invest. Radiol. 21,I:64-70.
14 - Katzberg R.W., Schulman G., Meggs L.G., Caldicott W.J., Damiano M. and Hollenberg N.K.(1983): Mechanism of renal response to contrast medium in dogs, Decrease renal function due to hyper tonicity. Invest. Radiol. 18, I:74-80.
15 - Kumar S., Hul J.D., Lathi S. and et al.(1981): Low incidence of renal failure after angiography. Arch. Intern. Med. 141, I:1268-1270.
16 - Mason R.A. Arbeit L.A. and Giron F.(1985): Renal dysfunction and arteriograohy. J. Am. Med. Assoc.253, I:1001-1004.
17 - Meyer M.W. and Read R.C.(1964): Red cell aggtegation from concentrated saline and angiographic media. Radiology. 82, I:630-635.
18 - Norbert W.T.(1986): Textbook of Clinical Chemistrey. 1st ed. pp:202-224.
19 - Parfrey P.S. Griffiths S.M., Barrett B.J. and et al.(1989): Contrast material induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency or both.N Engi. Med. 320, I: 143-149.
20 - Sobin S.S.(1959): Nature of adverse reactions to redioopaque agents. J.Am. Vet. Assoc. 170, I:1546-1547.
21 - Teruel J.C., Marcen R., Onaindia J.M. and et al.(1981): Renal function impairment caused by intravenous urography: aprospective study. Arch. Intern. Med. 141,I: 1271-1274.
22 - Werbin N., Orda R., Tulpan G., Baratz M. and Wiznitzer T.(1981): Retrograde urography with a new antiseptic contrast material, An experimental study. Urol. Int. 36,I:322-324.
23 - Wolf G.L., Mulry C.S., Kilzer K. and Laski P.A.(1981): New angiographic agents with less fibrillatory propensity. Invest. Radiol. 16,I: 320-323
_||_