Identifying and prioritizing sustainable supply chain cost reduction for cable manufacturing using ANP and Fuzzy DEMATEL
Subject Areas : Journal of Value Chain Management
Mohammad Reza Komari Alaei
1
,
Mahdi Abdsharafat
2
*
,
meraj heidari
3
1 - 1Department of Industrial Engineering Management, Alghadir institute of Higher Education, Tabriz, Iran
2 -
3 - Department of Industrial Engineering Management, Alghadir institute of Higher Education, Tabriz, Iran
Keywords: Sustainable supply chain, environmental compatibility, compliance with external requirements, green warehouse cost control, green credit,
Abstract :
The aim of this research is to present a combined ANP and Fuzzy DEMATEL model in multi-criteria decision-making for identifying and prioritizing sustainable supply chain cost reduction of production cables. The statistical population of this research includes all industrial engineers and production planners based at Simcat Tabriz Company. The statistical sample is 10 industry experts selected according to hourly opinion. A researcher-made questionnaire. In this research, ANP has been used to prioritize sustainable supply chain cost reduction and prioritize it, and Fuzzy DEMATEL has been used to identify the intensity of cause-and-effect relationships in sustainable supply chain cost reduction. For this purpose, 23 criteria have been selected according to the opinions of industry experts. The results obtained from network analysis show that the cost control is more preferable for company and is the best criterion for selecting the green warehouse priority. Because the use of green energy and the adoption of sustainable technologies to produce cables with environmental compatibility and prevent further pollution were required in those conditions. On the other hand, the production of such cables created energy savings and the transfer of this energy savings to other sectors for optimal energy use was more necessary. The results of the fuzzy DEMATEL method show that consumer pressure, investment, competitors and societal culture thinking are in the first, second, third and last ranks respectively.
زمانیان, الهه, & صالحی, مجتبی. (1401). ارزیابی عملکرد زنجیره تأمین خدماتی با نگرش استراتژیک مبتنی بر رویکرد SCOR و تکنیک اولویتبندی فازی. مدیریت زنجیره تأمین, 24(75), 75-85.
حسین پور, فاطمه , سلیمانی دامنه, رضا و اسماعیل زاده, منصور . (1403). نگاشت مدل علی انعطافپذیری زنجیره تامین صنعت کاشی با روش دلفی فازی و دیمتل فازی. بهبود مدیریت, 18(2), 1-20. doi: 10.22034/jmi.2024.421556.3030.
حیدری دهویی،جلیل،حسینی دهشیری،سید جلال لدین. (1398). « شناسایی و اولویت بندی راهکارهای کاهش هزینه زنجیره تأمین کابل و تجهیزات نیروگاهی با استفاده از مهندسی ارزش. فصلنامه علمی مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی – سال هفدهم، شماره 25 ، 252- صفحات 22.
طبری، سید علوی، یحیی زاده فرد، محمود.(1399). شناسائی و رتبه بندی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت صنعت خودرو سازی.ANP,DEMATEL اجرای زنجیره تامین پایدار با استفاده از یک روش ترکیبی فصلنامه مدیریت صنعتی دانشکده علوم انسانی ،آزاد اسلامی واحد سنندج، سال یازدهم شماره 51.
نعمتی، روح الله،. جعفرنژاد چقوشی، احمد،. عموزاد مهدیرجی، حنانه.( ۱۴۰۳). «طراحی مدل چابکی زنجیره تامین پایدار در صنعت نفت و گاز استان بوشهر با رویکرد آمیخته.». تکنولوژی در کارآفرینی و مدیریت استراتژیک. دوره 3، شماره 4، 291-306.
Abbasi, M., Nilsson, F. (2012). Themes and challenges in making supply chains environmentally sustainable. Supply Chain Manag. 17, 517e530.
Abdulrahman, M.D., Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N. (2014). Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147, 460e471.
Alaei, M. R. K., Rostamzadeh, R., Abdsharafat, M., Albayrak, K., & Abdollahi, S. The effect of resilience for selection of suppliers with hybrid fuzzy mcdm El efecto de la resiliencia para la selección de proveedores con hybrid fuzzy mcdm. https://doi.org/10.5377/nexo.v36i04.16789.
Azevedo SG, Govindan K, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V. (2013). Ecosilient index to assess the greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. J Clean Prod 56:131–146.
Bubicz ME, Barbosa- Povoa APF, Carvalho. (2019). Incorporating social aspects in sustainable supply chains: trends and future directions. J Cleaner Prod, 237:117500.
Chalmeta, Ricardo, Santos-deLeón, Nestor J. (2020). Sustainable supply chain in the era of industry 4.0 and big data: a systematic analysis of literature and research. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4108; doi: 10.3390/su12104108.
Cormack, Allan., Tavares Thom´e, Antonio M´arcio, Silvestre, Bruno. (2021). An integrative conceptual framework for supply chain sustainability learning: A process-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 320, 128675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128675.
De, A., Choudhary, A., Tiwari, M.K. (2019). Multi objective approach for sustainable ship routing and scheduling with draft restrictions. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 66,35e51.
Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J.; Papadopoulos, T.; Helo, P. (2019). Supplier relationship management for circular economy. Manag. Decis. 57, 767–790.
Gao, D., Xu, Z.D., Ruan, Y.L.Z., Lu, H.Y. (2017). From a systematic literature review to integrated, definition for sustainable supply chain innovation (SSCI). J. Clean. Prod. 142, 1518e1538.
Govindan K, Rajeev A., Padhi SS, Pati RK. (2020). Supply chain sustainability and per- formance of firms: a meta-analysis of the literature. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev; 137:101923.
Gupta H, Kusi-Sarpong S, Rezaei J. (2020). Barriers and overcoming strategies to supply chain sustainability innovation. Resour Conserv Recycl 2020; doi: 10. 1016/j.resconrec.2020.104819.
Chandan, H, C., Das, R. (2017). Evolution of responsible and sustainable corporate identity for Chinese firms. The China Business Model, Elsevier, pp. 71–96.
Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1075–1082.
Luthra, S.; Mangla, S.K. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 117, 168–179.
Manavalan E, Jayakrishna K Manalapan. (2019). A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements. Comput Ind Eng 2019; 127:925–53.
Mueller, M., Gomes dos Santos, V., Seuring, S. (2009). The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. J. Bus. Ethics 89 (4), 509e524.
Neutzling, D.M., Land, A., Seuring, S., Do Nascimento, L.F.M. (2018). Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration.J. Clean. Prod. 172, 3448e3458.
Nilsson, Fredrik, Malin, Oransson. (2021). Critical factors for the realization of sustainable supply chain.
Otto, A.; Kotzab, H. Does supply chain management really pay? (2003). Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res, 144, 306–320.
Parthibaraj, C.S., Subramanian, N., Palaniappan, P.L.K., Lai, K.-H. (2018). Sustainable decision model for liner shipping industry. Comput. Oper. Res. 89, 213e229.
Savino, M.M., Mazza, A. (2014). Toward environmental and quality sustainability: an integrated approach for continuous improvement. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 61 (1), 161e171.
Seuring, S., Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 16, 1699e1710.
Singh, C.S., Soni, G. & Badhotiya, G.K. Performance indicators for supply chain resilience: review and conceptual framework. J Ind Eng Int 15 (Suppl 1), 105–117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-019-00322-2.
Üyüközkan, Gülçin, B, Çig˘dem, Berkol. (2021). Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications.38(2011)1373113748.doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.171.
Ye ,Nan., Kueh ,Tung-Boon, Hou ,Lisong. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development, J. Clean. Prod. 272, 15.
Zhao, Guohao., Ahmed, Rahil Irfan., Ahmad, Naveed., Yan, Cheng, Shahjahan Usmani, Muhammad. (2021). Prioritizing critical success factors for sustainable energy sector in China: A DEMATEL approach. Energy Strategy, Reviews35, 100635.