Identifying the Constituent Factors of Open Governance with a Sustainable Development Approach in the Municipalities of Tehran Province
Subject Areas : Urban Management Studies
Masoud mirzapour
1
(Public Administration, Faculty of Economic Management, Science and Research Unit)
sedigheh tootian
2
(Assistant Professor, Department of management, College of Humanities East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran()
Ghilamreza memarzadehtehran
3
(Associate Professor of Government Management Department, Faculty of Management and Economics, Azad Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran)
Gholamreza hashemzadeh
4
(Department of Industrial Management, Production and Operations, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Keywords: Governance, open governance, Sustainable development,
Abstract :
Introduction and purpose of the research: open governance as one of the most efficient forms of governance, which has the ability to increase citizens' participation, strengthen transparency and reduce government corruption, and strengthen social and environmental sustainability, is most important to planning and decisions related to sustainable development. has it. Therefore, the current research was conducted with the aim of identifying the factors that constitute open governance in the approach to sustainable development in the municipalities of Tehran province. Research method: The method of this research was qualitative-quantitative, which used theme analysis and descriptive-survey. The statistical population in the qualitative section was academic experts and specialists who were proficient in the subject, who reached theoretical saturation in 20 interviews with a targeted method. In the quantitative part, there were about 440 senior managers of the municipalities of Tehran province, and using the Cochran formula, the sample size was 205. Data analysis was done using coding methods, factor analysis and model testing in SPSS-24 and Smart Pls-3 software. Findings: Three factors of open service, open data and open process were found for open governance. Also, sustainable development with economic, environmental and social dimensions was approved. Conclusion: Sustainable development and environmental preservation, poverty reduction, increase in per capita income and creation of a platform to attract investment and use of open data and strengthening of social networks and creation of network relationships between all stakeholders and civil society activists should be done.
ابوالمعالی، فاطمه السادات، پورعزت، علی اصغر، دانش‌فرد، کرم‌اله. (1399). الگویی برای شناسایی پیش‌ران‌های کاربست مدل حکمرانی باز در دستگاه‌های اجرایی ایران (مورد مطالعه: وزارت کشور). مدیریت دولتی (دانشگاه تهران)، 12 (1)، 142 تا 171.
آذر، عادل، رجب زاده قیطری، علی، اخوان، عطیه (1396). نگاشت مدل تولید پایدار با رویکرد مدل سازی ساختاری تفسیری و دیمتل فازی، فصلنامه علمی ـ پژوهشی مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، 15 (46)، 1-26.
بمانیان، محمدرضا، محمودی‌نژاد، هادی. (1397). تحقیقی در سنجش عوامل تأثیرگذار بر احساس امنیت شهری نمونه موردی: شهر کرمان. مدیریت شهری و روستایی، 19 (9)، 59-71.
پیشوایی، میرسامان، عبدالحمید، مهدی، عبدالحسین زاده، محمد. (1400). درآمدی بر مفهوم شناسی و کارکردهای دولت باز و خط‌مشی گذاری باز در عرصه حکمرانی. فصلنامه مطالعات حکمرانی، 12 (47)، 1-16.
محمدبیگی، ابوالفضل، محمدصالحی، نرگس، علی گل، محمد. (2015). روایی و پایایی ابزارها و روش‌های مختلف اندازه‌گیری آنها در پژوهش‌های کاربردی در سلامت. مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان، 13 (12)، 1153-1170.
محمدی، محمدعلی، حکمتی، نرگس، و غلامی، فرزانه. (1402). ارائه مدل حکمرانی باز در ایران. پژوهش‌های حقوقی و سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، 51 (2)، 1-22.
_||_
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18 (4), 543-571.
Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. OUP Oxford.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future—Call for action. Environmental conservation, 14 (4), 291-294.
Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas: international journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations, 23, 1119-1138.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
Criado, J. I., Ruvalcaba-Gómez, E. A., & Valenzuela-Mendoza, R. (2018). Revisiting the Open Government Phenomenon. A meta-analysis of the international literature. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 10 (1), 50-81.
European Commission. (2015). Open Governance: A Guide to Best Practice. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7d5c05f3-b3d9-4f3a-8e46-07f9bc73f5a4/language-en.
Guadarrama, R., Hernández, R., & González, A. (2010). Sustainable development: A review of its concept and strategies of implementation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 17 (1), 8-16.
Lauwo, S. G., Azure, J. D. C., & Hopper, T. (2022). Accountability and governance in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals in a developing country context: evidence from Tanzania. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
McKeown, R., Hopkins, C. A., Rizi, R., & Chrystalbridge, M. (2002). Education for sustainable development toolkit (p. 2002). Knoxville: Energy, Environment and Resources Center, University of Tennessee.
Millard, J. (2018). Open governance systems: Doing more with more. Government Information Quarterly, 35 (4), S77-S87.
Meadowcroft, J. (2013). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. In Governance for sustainable development (pp. 107-122). Routledge.
Harrison, T. M., & Sayogo, D. S. (2014). Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government information quarterly, 31 (4), 513-525.
Pisano, U., Lepuschitz, K., & Berger, G. (2014). Sustainability transitions at the international, European and national level. European Sustainable Development Network Quarterly Report.[online access on, 7, 2022.
Sarpong, S. Y., & Bein, M. A. (2021). Effects of good governance, sustainable development and aid on quality of life: Evidence from sub‐saharan Africa. African Development Review, 33 (1), 25-37.
Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. In The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press.
Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives.
Tavares, A. F., Camões, P. J., & Martins, J. (2023). Joining the open government partnership initiative: An empirical analysis of diffusion effects. Government Information Quarterly, 101789.
Schmidthuber, L., Ingrams, A., & Hilgers, D. (2021). Government openness and public trust: The mediating role of democratic capacity. Public Administration Review, 81 (1), 91-109.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues1. Hague journal on the rule of law, 3 (2), 220-246.
Kettl, D. F. (2000). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public administration review, 60 (6), 488-497.
Robert, K. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development, 47 (3), 8-21.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://www.unenvironment.org/sustainable-development-goals.
UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education towards the global common good? Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002325/232555e.pdf.
Glass, L. M., & Newig, J. (2019). Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions?. Earth System Governance, 2, 100031.
Glass, L. M., & Newig, J. (2019). Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions?. Earth System Governance, 2, 100031.
Janowski, T., Estevez, E., & Baguma, R. (2018). Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizen-administration relationships in the digital age. Government Information Quarterly, 35 (4), S1-S16.
OECD. (2021). The Economic and Social Impact of Open Government. In OECD Public Governance Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1787/6b3e2469-en
Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. International journal of public administration, 38 (5), 381-396.