A Comparative Study of Mayor Election Procedures in Iran and Seven European Countries
Subject Areas : Urban Management StudiesNaser Barakpur 1 , mahya motahari 2
1 - OSTAD
2 - Urbanism, Architecture and Urbanism facaulty, Tehran, University of Art
Keywords: Mayor Election Procedure, Directly Elected Mayor, Urban Administration System, Iran, Europe,
Abstract :
Introduction and purpose of research: The performance and duties of the mayor may vary widely based on the different conditions. The procedure of electing mayor is a crucial factor in the performance of mayor. In general, there are two main procedures for electing a mayor: direct election of mayor and indirect election. In Iran mayor is appointed indirectly by the city council. This model has caused different problems in city management in Iran. A comprehensive analysis of the procedure of electing mayor in Iran, comparing it to this procedure in other countries could be useful to make a decision about what could be the most appropriate procedure in Iran. In this research, the performance of the mayor in different countries has been compared, by doing a comprehensive study of countries, including their governmental system, partisan system (in macro level), and the statutory position of mayor (in micro level). Research Methodology: This research is a fundamental one, which includes a descriptive method by using qualitative comparative method in analyzing the countries. Interpretive method was used to analyze the interview data. Findings: The power of networking of the mayor is one of the factors that improve the efficiency of urban management. According to studies, direct election of the mayor makes the mayors have better interaction with government levels, therefore, the direct election of the mayor can play an important role in improving the networking and efficiency of mayors. In Iran, the mechanisms for monitoring and balancing between the council and the mayor are not clearly defined, therefore, because directly elected mayor gives mayors more power, the clarity of the laws to supervise the mayor by the council is important and sensitive. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study it could be said that direct election of the mayor can increase the efficiency, responsibility, coordinating and power of the mayor. Moreover, if along with that other changes would happen, such as competence and duty of the local government, procedure of discharging and appointing of mayor and his/her cabinet, clarity of rules about checking and controlling of mayor by the council, elimination of unstable incomes from the budget of municipality, and elimination of distinct structure of managing city, could proliferate the performance of the urban management system and mayor.
آخوندی، عباس. برکپور، ناصر. اسدی، ایرج. بصیرت، میثم. طاهرخانی، حبیب الله .1387 . آسیب شناسی مدل اداره امور شهر در ایران. پژوهشهای جغرافیایی. شماره 63
آخوندی، عباس. برکپور، ناصر. اسدی، ایرج. بصیرت، میثم. طاهرخانی، حبیب الله .1387. بررسی تاثیر انتخاب مستقیم شهرداران در بهبود شاخص‌های حکمروایی شهری در ایران. صفه. شماره 46
آخوندی، عباس. برکپور، ناصر. اسدی، ایرج. بصیرت، میثم.؛ طاهرخانی، حبیب الله .1389. گزارش امکانسنجی انتخاب مستقیم شهرداران توسط مردم در ایران. مرکز مطالعات و برنامه ریزی شهر تهران
پیش نویس لایحه قانونی مدیریت شهری .1393.سازمان شهرداریها و دهیاریهای کشور، معاونت امور شهرداریها
کریمی، صدیقه. نصر، احمدرضا .1392. روشهای تجزیه و تحلیل دادههای مصاحبه. پژوهش. شماره 1(7)
مردعلی، محسن. حسین پور پویان، رضا. نظری، تقی. 1391. بررسی نظرات شهروندان تهرانی در خصوص نحوه انتخاب شهردار تهران. مرکز مطالعات و برنامه ریزی شهر تهران
میرحیدر، دره. (1385). اصول و مبانی جغرافیای سیاسی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
مهرپور، حسین. (1391). مختصر حقوق اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. تهران: دادگستر.
نیومن، پیتر و اندی تورنلی. 1386. برنامه ریزی شهری در اروپا، رقابت بین المللی، نظامهای ملی و طرحهای برنامهریزی. ترجمهی عارف اقوامی مقدم. تهران: آذرخش.
ولمن، هلموت. چاپ، لینز. دامن، هری. رینگلینگ، آرتور. ماگر، جیمی. برترانا، خاویر. هووارد، جوانا. 1395. مجموعه مقالههای مدیریت شهری و انتخاب شهردار. ترجمهی ناصر برک پور و همکاران، تهران: دانشگاه هنر.
Ackaert, J. 2005. Transformation of the political executive in Belgian local government, in: R.Berg & N. Rao (Eds) Transforming Local Political Leadership, Basingstoke:Palgrave MacMillan
Back, H., Heinelt, H., Magnier, A.2006. Typologies of Local Government Systems. In H.Back, H.Heinelt & A.Magnier (Eds.), The European Mayor. Berlin.
Budge, Ian. 2002. Great Britain and Ireland: variations of party government, In Josef M. Colomer (Eds.), Political Institutions in Europe. Routledge. London.
Colomer, Josep M. 2002. Spain and Portugal: rule by party leadership, In Josef M. Colomer (Eds.), Political Institutions in Europe. Routledge.London.
Callanan, M. & Keogan, J.F. (Eds). 2003. Local Government in Ireland, Inside Out.Institute of Public Administration. Dublin.
Copus, C. 2006 Leading the Localities. Executive Mayors in English Local Government. Manchester University Press. Manchester.
Katz, B. 2005. Elected mayors – Lessons from the US. London, U.K.: The Brooking Institution, Center for Cities 'City Mayors' event.
Magnier, A.2006. Strong Mayors? On Direct Election and Political Entrepreneurship. In H.Back, H.Heinelt & A.Magnier (Eds.), The European Mayor .Berlin.
Podolnjak, R., Gardasevic, D. 2013. Directly Elected Mayors and the Problem of Cohabitation. The Case of the Croation Capital Zagreb. Revus[Online].
Saldana, Johnny. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE.
Schaap, L., Daemen, H., Ringeling, A.2009. Mayors in Seven European Countries: Part1. Selection Procedures and Statutory Position, Routledge, England, Vol.35, No.1.
Vogel, R.K. 2005. Governing Large Cities: A Comparative Perspective, Louisvill: University of Louisvill.
Wollmann, H.2005. The directly-elected executive mayor in German local government, Transforming Local Political Leadership. Palgrave.
Wollmann, H. 2004. Local Government Reforms in Great Britain,Sweden, Germany and France: Between Multi-Function and Single-Purpose Organizations, Local Government Studies, Vol.30, No.4.
_||_