Feasibility Study of Resilience Management Principles in Iran Metropolises with Emphasis on Hugo (HFA) Approach (Case study: Tabriz metropolis)

Subject Areas : Urban Management Studies

Maryam  Alipour Shoari Dehghani ¹ (Phd. Student, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran)
Ali  Panahi ² (Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran)
reza  Valizadeh ³ (Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran)

Received: 2021-04-06 Accepted : 2021-06-07 Published : 2021-05-22

Keywords: Urban Management, resilience, Hugo Approach, Tabriz metropolis,

Abstract :

Introduction and purpose: In the settlement risk reduction approach, a resilient system is one that can absorb temporary and permanent hazards and adapt to rapidly changing conditions without losing its function. In this regard, the need for a dynamic and systematic management approach in order to achieve resilience is felt. Considering the importance of the role of managerial indicators in the realization of a resilient city, the purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of resilient management principles in Tabriz metropolis with emphasis on the Hugo approach. Research method: Research method is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of analytical-exploratory nature, which in order to analyze the information has been used the exploratory factor analysis model. Also, the statistical population of the study includes academic elites and managers and officials in the field of crisis management in Tabriz, that the sample size is estimated to be 100 people based on the Delphi method. Findings: Findings show that the top 10 management principles of resilience based on Hugo's perspective such as integration and coordination in decision-making and policy-making, oversight and inspection measures, structures and laws, organizational and local capacity building, and approaches to crisis and rehabilitation in and after metropolitan areas. Tabriz is not in a good condition. Results: The results also show that 17 components affect the impracticability of this approach in Tabriz metropolis, which based on the factor analysis model, the three main factors of management structure and inefficient laws, lack of institutional capacity building and emphasis on knowledge-based and lack of multidimensional and systemic perspective can be classified with special values of 6.452, 3.159 and 1.8993, respectively.  

References:

پاشازاده، اصغر. 1398. سنجش تاب‌آوری شهر اردبیل در برابر مخاطرات محیطی و ارائه‌ی الگوی شهر تاب‌آور با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی. رساله‌ی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده‌ی ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، استاد راهنما: محمدحسن یزدانی.

پاشازاده، اصغر؛ یزدانی، محمدحسن. 1397. تاب‌آوری شهری. اردبیل: انتشارات گونش نگار.

رضایی، محمدرضا. 1390. ارزیابی تاب‌آوری اقتصادی و نهادی جوامع شهری در برابر سوانح طبیعی مطالعه موردی: زلزله­‌ی محله­های شهر تهران. مدیریت بحران، 2(3)، 36-25.

رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ رضایی، محمدرضا؛ عسگری، علی؛ پرهیزکار، اکبر؛ شایان، سیاوش. 1390. تبیین مفهومی تاب‌‌آوری و شاخص‌سازی آن در مدیریت سوانح اجتماع‌محور (CBDM). برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا (مدرس علوم انسانی)، 15(72)، 41-19.

رمضان­زاده، مهدی. 1395. مبانی و مفاهیم تاب‌آوری شهری (مدل­ها و الگوها). تهران: معاونت مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی امور زیرساخت­ و طرح جامع، مدیریت مطالعات و برنامه­ریزی امور فنی و عمرانی، استاندارسازی و امور بحران.

زادولی خواجه، شاهرخ. (1397). بازاندیشی بوم‌محور در امکان‌سنجی ارتقاء کیفی – کالبدی مناطق اسکان غیررسمی بر اساس معیارهای مسکن حداقل (بررسی تطبیقی کلان‌شهرهای اهواز و تبریز). رساله‌ی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، استاد راهنما سعید ملکی، دانشکده‌ی ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.

عباسی گوجانی، داوود؛ خادم‌الحسینی، احمد؛ مدیری، مهدی؛ صابری، حمید؛ گندمکار، امیر. 1398. تحلیل پیشران‌های تبیین‌کننده‌ی تاب‌آوری شهری در کلان‌شهر مشهد. جغرافیای اجتماعی شهری، 6(14)، 122-109.

فرزاد بهتاش، محمدرضا؛ کی‌نژاد، محمدعلی؛ پیربابایی، محمدتقی؛ اصغری، علی. 1392. ارزیابی و تحلیل مؤلفه‌های تاب‌آوری کلان‌شهر تبریز. هنرهای زیبا، 18(3)، 42-33.

گاسپارینی، پائولو؛ گانتو، مانفردی؛ دومینکو، آسپرونه. 1395. تاب‌آوری و پایداری در مقابل بلایای طبیعی (چالشی برای شهرهای آینده). ترجمه‌ی حسین حاتمی‌نژاد و مرتضی نصرتی­هشی، تهران: انتشارات آراد کتاب.

نامجویان، فرخ؛ رضویان، محمدتقی؛ سرور، رحیم. 1396. تاب‌آوری شهری چارچوبی الزام‌آور برای مدیریت آینده‌ی شهرها، فصلنامه‌ی جغرافیایی سرزمین، 14(55)، 95-81.

 

Agudelo-Vero, Claudia M. 2012. Harvesting urban resources towards more resilient cities, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 64, 3-12.

Bai, X., Shi, P., Liu, Y. 2014. Realizing China's urban dream. Nature, 509, 158–160.

Chelleri, L., Baravikova, A. 2020. Understandings of urban resilience meanings and principles across Europe, Cities, 108, 1-12.

Everitt, B. S. 1994. Statistical Methods for Medical Investigations. Edward Arnold, London.

Fatemi, M. N. Rahman, T. 2015. Regeneration of the Hazaribagh urban brownfield: An imperative for Dhaka’s sustainable urban development, Urbani izziv, 26(2), 132-145.

Folke, C. Carpenter, S. R. Walker, B. Scheffer, M. Chapin, T. Rochstorm, J. 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability Ecology and Society, 15(4), 1-9.

Godschalk, D. 2003. Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilientcities, Natural Hazards Review, 4, 136-143.

Gonzales, P., Ajami, N. 2017. An Integrative Regional Resilience Framework for the Changing Urban Water Paradigm. Sustainable Cities and Society, 30, 128-138.

Jones, B.M., Stoker, J.M., Gibbs, A.E., Grosse, G., Romanovsky, V.E., Douglas, T.A., Kinsman, N.E.M., Richmond, B.M. 2013. Quantifying landscape change in an arctic coastal lowland using repeat airborne LiDAR. Environmental Resarch. 8, 1-11.

Kates, R.W., Clark,W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Carlo, C., Lowe, I., Mccarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Nancy, M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Iii, B.M., Riordan, T.O., Svedin, U., Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., Mccarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grubler, A., Huntley, B., Jager, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Iii, B.M., Riordan, T.O., Svedin, U. 2001. Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641–642.

Li, F. Liu, X, Hu, D, Wang, R, Yang, W, Li, D, Zhao, D. 2009. Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: A case study for China’s Jining City, Landscape and Urban Planning, 90 (3-4), 134-142.

Malhi, G.S., Das, P., Bell, E., Mattingly, G., Mannie, Z. 2019. Modelling resilience in adolescence and adversity: a novel framework to inform research and practice. Translational Psychiatry. 9, 1-16

Mayunga, J. S. 2007. Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach, A Draft Working Paper Prepared for the Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability and Resilience Building, 22- 28 July 2007, Munich.

Meerow, S., Newell, J., Stults, M. 2016. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49.

Michael, F. L. Zainon Noor, Z. Figueroab M. J. 2014. Review of urban sustainability indicators assessment–Case study between Asian countries. Habitat International, 44, 491-500.

Neumann, B., Unger, S. 2019. From voluntary commitments to ocean sustainability. Science, 363, 35–36.

Price, S.J., Ford, J.R., Campbell, S.D.G., Jefferson, I. 2016. Urban Futures: the sustainable management of the ground beneath cities. In: Eggers, M.J., Griffiths, J.S., Parry, S., Culshaw, M.G. (Eds.) Developments in Engineering Geology. Geological Society of London Engineering Geology Special Publication 27, London, pp. 19–33.

Redman, C.L. 2014. Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits? Ecology and Society, 19 (2), 1-12.

Seeliger, L., Turok, I. 2013. Towards sustainable cities: extending resilience with insights from vulnerability and transition theory. Sustain 5, 2108–2128.

Spaans, M., Waterhout, B. 2017. Building up resilience in cities worldwide–rotterdam as participant in the 100 Resilient Cities Programme. Cities 61, 109–116.

Sutton-Grier, A.E., Wowk, K., Bamford, H. 2015. Future of our coasts: the potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 137–148.

Thorne, K., MacDonald, G., Guntenspergen, G., Ambrose, R., Buffington, K., Dugger, B., Freeman, C., Janousek, C., Brown, L., Rosencranz, J., Holmquist, J., Smol, J., Hargan, K., Takekawa, J. 2018. U.S. Pacific coastal wetland resilience and vulnerability to sealevel rise. Science Advances, 4, 1–11.