Applying Proactive Actions Before the Occurrence of Severe Natural Disasters to Increase the Resilience of Distribution Network

Subject Areas : Power Engineering

Omid Nazem ¹ , Hadi Saghafi ^{2 *}

1 - Department of Electrical Engineering, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of Electrical Engineering, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Received: 2022-08-08 Accepted : 2022-11-16 Published : 2023-05-22

Keywords: Repair teams, resilience, Distribution network, Preventive actions, Portable distributed generation resources,

Abstract :

In recent years, the rate of occurrence of natural disasters has increased, which has led to extensive damage to the power system and extensive blackouts. preventive measures can be used in the distribution network to reduce the effects of severe natural disasters. preventive actions are opposite to reactive actions. preventive measures are taken before the incident and reactive measures are taken after the incident. In this paper, a mathematical model is presented to show the effects of preventive actions. In the proposed model, as soon as the accident is predicted, by predicting the exit of the damaged lines in the network using the Monte Carlo method, post-accident failure scenarios are generated. Then, in order to reduce the volume of calculations, scenario reduction is done using Gams. In the last stage, by implementing the proposed model, the optimal location for the installation of portable distributed generation sources and the repair team is determined. The simulation on different case studies shows that using proposed method results in considerable reduction of the energy not supplied (ENS) and the time of power outage for loads, which shows the good performance of the proposed method in facing to future disaster.

References:

1. B. Taheri, A. Safdarian, M. Moeini-Aghtaie, and M. Lehtonen, “Enhancing resilience level of power distribution systems using proactive operational actions,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 137378–137389, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941593.


2. M. H. Amirioun, F. Aminifar, H. Lesani, and M. Shahidehpour, “Metrics and quantitative framework for assessing microgrid resilience against windstorms,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 104, pp. 716–723, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.07.025.


3. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 1978, doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5.


4. A. M. Madni and S. Jackson, “Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 2009, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017397.


5. C. Perrings, “Resilience and sustainable development,” Environment and Development Economics, vol. 11, no. 4. pp. 417–427, 2006, doi: 10.1017/S1355770X06003020.


6. A. Gholami, T. Shekari, M. H. Amirioun, F. Aminifar, M. H. Amini, and A. Sargolzaei, “Toward a consensus on the definition and taxonomy of power system resilience,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 32035–32053, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2845378.


7. H. Luan and C. C. Tsai, “A Review of Using Machine Learning Approaches for Precision Education,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 250–266, 2021.


8. A. Mosavi, P. Ozturk, and K. W. Chau, “Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 11, p. 1536, 2018, doi: 10.3390/w10111536.


9. B. Choubin et al., “Earth fissure hazard prediction using machine learning models,” Environ. Res., vol. 179, p. 108770, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108770.


10. A. Jaafari, E. K. Zenner, M. Panahi, and H. Shahabi, “Hybrid artificial intelligence models based on a neuro-fuzzy system and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of wildfire probability,” Agric. For. Meteorol., vol. 266–267, pp. 198–207, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.12.015.


11. R. Sharma, S. Rani, and I. Memon, “A smart approach for fire prediction under uncertain conditions using machine learning,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 79, no. 37–38, pp. 28155–28168, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11042-020-09347-x.


12. H. Gao, Y. Chen, S. Mei, S. Huang, and Y. Xu, “Resilience-Oriented Pre-Hurricane Resource Allocation in Distribution Systems Considering Electric Buses,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 1214–1233, 2017, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2666548.


13. S. Lei, C. Chen, H. Zhou, and Y. Hou, “Routing and Scheduling of Mobile Power Sources for Distribution System Resilience Enhancement,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 5650–5662, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2018.2889347.


14. A. Gholami, T. Shekari, and S. Grijalva, “Proactive Management of Microgrids for Resiliency Enhancement: An Adaptive Robust Approach,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 470–480, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2740433.


15. M. H. Amirioun, F. Aminifar, and H. Lesani, “Resilience-Oriented Proactive Management of Microgrids Against Windstorms,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 4275–4284, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2765600.


16. M. H. Amirioun, F. Aminifar, and M. Shahidehpour, “Resilience-promoting proactive scheduling against hurricanes in multiple energy carrier microgrids,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 2160–2168, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2881954.


17. J. Zhao, S. Kucuksari, E. Mazhari, and Y. J. Son, “Integrated analysis of high-penetration PV and PHEV with energy storage and demand response,” Appl. Energy, vol. 112, pp. 35–51, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.070.