Impact of drought stress on the growth parameters of tea sapling infected with Pratylenchus loosi and nematode population density

Subject Areas : دو فصلنامه تحقیقات بیماریهای گیاهی

مینا Mahjoubi Nia ¹ , زهرا Tanha Maafi ² , علی Seraji ³ , سعید Rezaeei ⁴

1 - دانشجوی سابق کارشناسی ارشد، گروه بیماری شناسی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - دانشیار، بخش تحقیقات نماتد شناسی، موسسه تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی کشور، تهران، ایران
3 - استادیار، مرکز تحقیقات چای کشور، لاهیجان، ایران
4 - استادیار،گروه بیماری شناسی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

Received: 2013-01-17 Accepted : 2013-05-11 Published : 2013-05-22

Keywords: Pratylenchus loosi, Tea, soil texture, water stress, growth parameters, root lesion nematode,

Abstract :

Root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus loosi) is among the most damaging agents on tea
plant in Iran. The nematode causes quality and quantity losses on tea crop. Most of tea
plantations in Iran are under rain-fed conditions. In this research the impact of irrigation
intervals (and consequently drought stress) and two types of soil texture, loamy-sandy and
loamy-clay, on the population density of root lesion nematode and the growth indices of tea
sapling were studied. Tea saplings of clone 100 were planted in pots 6000 cm3 containing
either loamy-sandy or loamy-clay soil with population density of one nematode per g of soil.
The pots were irrigated at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days intervals and some were left without
irrigation as control. Pots were kept in the Tea-Research Station of Fashaalam for 8 months,
during this period the required agronomic practices were done according to the routine of the
region. After this period the saplings were harvested and in each experimental unit the growth
indices such as height, total weight, root fresh weight, aerial fresh weight, aerial dry weight
and root volume were measured. The nematode population density in soil and root were
determined as well. The results of analysis of variance showed that all treatments had
significant differences with each other. P. loosi could multiply well in treatments of 7 and 14
day irrigation intervals compared to treatments of 21 and 28 day and without irrigation.
Nematode populations in root showed positive correlation with root volume and root weight
at different irrigation intervals. Nematode population in soil and root were related too. The
results of this survey showed that tea saplings with 7 and 14 day irrigation intervals could
better tolerate the damage caused by P. loosi, in comparison to longer irrigation intervals and
the treatment without irrigation. The nematode population density was higher in root and soil
in loamy-sandy texture soil compared to loamy-clay soil This research revealed that in the
treatments with 7 and 14 day irrigation intervals the water requirements of tea plants are met,
consequently showing less damage in comparison with the other treatments with less water
supply.

References:

1. Audebert A, Coyne DL, Dingkuhn M, Plowright RA. 2000. The influence of cyst nematodes (Heterodera sacchari) and drought on water relation and growth of upland rice in Côte d'Ivoire. Plant and Soil 220: 235–242


2. Boag B, Hebden PM, Neilson R and Rodger SJ. 1998. Observations on the effect of different management regimes of set-aside land on nematode community structure. Applied Soil Ecology 9: 339–343.


3. Dropkin VH. 1989. Introduction to plant Nematology. 2^nd ed. New York: John Willey and Sons, Inc. 304 p.


4. Florini DA, Loria R and Kotcon JB. 1987. Influence of edaphic factors and previous crop on Pratylenchus spp. population densities in potato. Journal of Nematology 19: 85–92.


5. Ghaderi R and Karegar bideh A. 2011. Impact of drought stress on persistence of root lesion nematodeP .neglectus and P. thornei in in vivo, greenhouse conditions and in vitro. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 47:165–177.


6. Gnanapragasam NC and Sivapalan P. 1991. Influence of soil types and storage conditions on the recovery of Pratylenchus loosi from soil samples. Afro–Asian Journal of Nematology 1: 150–153.


7. Goralczyk K. 1998. Nematode in a costal dunce succession: Indicators of soil properties? Applied Soil Ecology 9: 465–469.


8. Griffin GD 1996. Importance of soil texture to the pathogenicity of plant parasitic nematodes on rangeland grasses. Nematropica 26: 27–37.


9. Nicol JM, Davies, KA, Hancock, TW and Fisher JM. 1999. Yield loss caused by Pratylenchus thornei on wheat in South Australia. Journal of Nematology31: 367–376.


10. Nicol JM and Oritz-Monasterio I. 2004. Effects of the root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus thornei, on wheat yields in Mexico. Nematology 6: 485–493.


11. Orion D, Amir J and Krikun J. 1984. Field observations on Pratylenchus thornei and its effects on wheat under arid conditions. Revue de Nématologie7: 341–345.


12. Seraji A, Pourjam E, Safaei N and Tanha Maafi Z. 2008. Biology and population dynamics of tea root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus loosi) in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 43: 98–115.


13. Seraji A. 2007. Study on biology, population dynamics of root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus loosi, in Iran and the possibility of damage evaluation by using epidemiological models [PhD]. [Tehran, Iran]: Tarbiat Modares University.


14. Smiley RW, Merrifield K, Patterson LM, Whittaker R G, Gourlie JA and Easley SA. 2004. Nematodes in dry land field crops in the semiarid Pacific Northwest USA. Journal of Nematology 36: 54–68.


15. Tanha Maafi Z and Mirhoseini Moghadam A. 2001. Influence of phosphorus nematicides on root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus loosi) in tea plantation of Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 37: 29–38.


16. Thompson JP, Mackenzie J and Amos R. 1995. Root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei) limits response of wheat but not barley to stored soil moisture in the Hermitage long-term tillage experiment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35:1049–1055.


17. Trudgill DL. 1991. Resistance to and tolerance of plant parasitic nematodes of plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology 29: 167–192.


18. Wallace, HR. 1973. Nematode Ecology and Plant Disease. London: Edward Arnold. 228 p.


19. Whitehead AG and Hemming JR. 1965. Comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Annals of Applied Biology 55: 25–38.