Literary democracy in the thought of Muhammad Ali Jamal-Zadeh and Mikhail Noaimeh (comparative study based on pre-disciplinary theory)
Subject Areas : Literary criticism
sajad arabi
1
*
,
Aliasghar Ghahramani Moghbel
2
,
naser zare
3
,
, Mohmmed Javad Pourabed
4
,
Rasol Ballavi
5
1 - Department of Arabic Language and Literature, College of Arts and Humanities, Persian Gulf University - Bushehr
2 - Arabic Language and Literature Department, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
3 - An Academic personnel at Persian Gulf university
4 - Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, Persian Gulf University-Bushehr
5 - Associate Professor of Arabic Language and Literature
Keywords: you want to know, Mikhail Naima, the statement of the new Persian literature, Muhammad Ali Jamal-Zadeh, Kan Makan, Literary democracy, if you like,
Abstract :
Muhammad Ali Jamal-Zadeh’s linguistic and literary views as the pioneer of the Persian short story in the introduction to his short story collection entitled “Yeki Boud, Yeki Naboud” contains concepts, the most important of which is the concept of “literary democracy,” which many critics considered “the manifesto of the new Persian literature.” The ease of understanding for the general public, the use of the vernacular language, the selection of ordinary narrative characters from the people of the street and the market and from different classes of society, describing the people’s customs and traditions, the simplicity and smoothness of writing, the strengthening of the classical language, the preservation of linguistic heritage, etc., are the most important manifestations of literary democracy that Jamal-Zadeh referred to in his This statement. Such opinions can be deduced from the works of the great Arab writer and leader of the Arabic short story, Mikhail Naima, and her linguistic and literary opinions. we seek to study the central concepts of Jamal-Zadeh’s narrative introduction to the literary and linguistic viewpoints of Michael Noaimeh, based on the descriptive-analytical approach and the comparative theory based on a pre-disciplinary vision . The results of the research showed that we can derive the central concepts of literary democracy in the linguistic and literary views of Michael Naima, with the difference that Naima’s views were not collected in a specific work, but rather dispersed in most of his works and can be deduced by reading his various works.