Sartre and the Falsification of Meaning:Ontology of being for itself and its Relationship with Concrete Ethics
Subject Areas : Intellectual explorationsZeynab ArabMistani 1 , Seyed Sadegh Zamani 2 , seyed rahmatolla mosavimoghadam 3
1 - PhD student in Philosophy of Art, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Art, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj
3 - Associate Professor, Department of Education, Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Keywords: Falsification of Meaning, Ontology, Sartre, Ethics, Being for itself,
Abstract :
Man is the only creature that needs meaning. He needs meaning as symbolic food as much as he needs food to survive. It is in this context that the meaning of life - one of the most important philosophical, psychological and religious issues - has been investigated from different perspectives and it has been discussed in different areas. In general, there are two views about meaning among thinkers and philosophers. Philosophers who consider meaning as an objective, external and "revealed" thing and philosophers who consider it as an internal, subjective and "unknown" thing that arose from within the human being which is subjective and its source is the will, choices and commitments of the human being. Sartre, too is among the thinkers who consider meaning as an internal and falsifiable matter. In this research, we try to answer the most important problem of today's human beings’ lives through the falsification of meaning by examining the relationship between the ontology of being for itself and concrete ethics in Sartre's philosophy. According to Sartre, a person does not have a predetermined and fixed nature; his nature is constantly being constructed by his choices. Man, as a living being, relying on his freedom, can create moral values approved by himself and his society, and by creating a sense of commitment, he can forge a meaning for life.
1- احمدی، بابک (1390). سارتر که مینوشت، تهران: مرکز.
2- رحیمی، مصطفی (1394). در جستجوی بشریتی بی نقاب، نوشتههایی از سارتر و در باب سارتر، تهران: انتشارات نیلیوفر.
3- سارتر، ژانپل (1391). اگزیستانسیالیسم و اصالت بشر، ترجمهی مصطفی رحیمی، تهران: انتشارات نیلوفر.
4- سارتر، ژانپل (1394). هستی و نیستی، ترجمهی مهستی بحرینی، تهران: انتشارت نیلوفر.
5- سارتر، ژانپل (1396). ادبیات چیست؟، ترجمهی ابوالحسن نجفی و مصطفی رحیمی، تهران: انتشارات نیلوفر.
6- ماتیوز، اریک (1378). فلسفه فرانسه در قرن بیستم، ترجمهی محسن خلیلی، انتشارات ققنوس.
7- مصلح، علیاصغر (1384). تقریری از فلسفههای اگزیس، تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشهی اسلامی.
8- کاپلستون، فردریک (1386). تایخ فلسفه، جلد نهم، ترجمهی عبدالحسین آذرنگ و سیدمحمود یوسفثانی، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
9- هولمز، رابرت ال (1385). مبانی فلسفه اخلاق، ترجمهی مسعود علیا، تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
10- Anderson, Thomas. C (1993). Sartre,s Two Ethics: From Authenticity to Integral Humanity,Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.
11- Braddock, Glenn (2006). Sartre in Atheism, Freedom and Morality in the Humanism of Existentialism, In Existentialism Thinkers and Ethics, ed. Christine Daigle,Mc Gill, Queen,s University Press.
12- Sartre, Jean- Paul (1948). Existentialism and Humanism, London: Methuen.
13- Sartre, Jean- Paul (1969). Being and Nothingness, Trans by Hazel E.Barnes, Routledge.
14- Sartre, Jean- Paul (1983).Cahiers pour une moral,vol. 1, Paris: Gallimard.
15- Sartre, Jean- Paul (1976).l,etre et neant, Paris: Gallimard.
16- Stace, walter. T. (1999). There is meaning in absurdity, in Pojman, Louis P. Philosophy the Quest for Truth. United States of America: Wads Worth Publishing Company. An In Ternational Thomson Publisging Company