Semantic Solutions for Digital Libraries Emphasizing on Semantic Web Standards and Technologies

Subject Areas : Journal of Knowledge Studies

Zohreh Mirhoseini ¹ , morad dastaran ²

1 - Associate Professor of Knowledge& Information Science, Islamic Azad University- Tehran North Branch
2 - PhD student of Information Science & Science, Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch, Faculty of Humanities

Received: 2019-11-02 Accepted : 2020-08-26 Published : 2019-05-22

Keywords: Semantic web, Semantic Web Standards (RDA and RDF), Semantic Web Technologies, Semantic Web Challenges,

Abstract :

Objective: This paper describes the emerging semantic-social concepts in digital libraries and explores the potential use of semantic web technologies. Methods: The present study is a qualitative and analytical-explanatory one that uses Michel Foucault's theoretical (paleontological) contexts to evaluate changes in the semantic web domain. Results: The present study, after examining the challenges of semantic web implementation and access to semantic tools and services, demonstrates the benefits of applying standards (RDA and RDF), and thus provides a brief classification of tools and services. Semantic services are provided. In addition, a checklist has been suggested to further evaluate semantic tools, services, and projects. Conclusion: Given that digital libraries will hold a huge amount of future data, As a result, the use of semantic web standards and technologies in digital libraries offers a new level of flexibility, interaction, interoperability and knowledge sharing and enhances their capabilities, so it is necessary to use from semantic web standards and tools. In semantic web a framework will be presented that every subject can be defined according to its special features, also these subjects among a net of communications have a possibility of adding a new or related meaning. Through semantic web, social semantic digital libraries will present a new level of capabilities, increasing cooperation& mutual communication, and sharing knowledge.

References:

خویدکی، س.؛  نوروزی، ی. (1393). کتابخانه دیجیتالی معنایی اجتماعی: دورنمای برای کتابخانه­های دیجیتال در ایران. رهیافت، (57)،78-67.

گریگوریس، آ. (1390).  مبانی وب معنایی. ترجمه مهدیه قدسی نژاد، علی اصغر آل شیخ. تهران: دانشگاه خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی

مرادی، خ. (1395). فضای مفهومی؛ رویکردی جهت توسعه وب معنایی. مطالعات دانش­شناسی، 3 (9)، 109-97.

یوسفی­راد، ا. (1388). آر.دی.اف: الگویی برای توصیف منابع در وب معنایی. فصلنامه کتاب، (79)، 9-23. ­ 

Aghaei, S. ; Nematbakhsh M, A. and Farsan, H.  K. (2014). Evolution of theWorld Wide Web: from Web 1.0 to Web 4.0. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology. 1-10. Available at:http://airccse.org/journal/ ijwest/ papers/3112ijwest01.pdf        

Anderson, C. (2010). Free: How Today's Smartest Businesses Profit byGiving Something for Nothing. London: Random House Business    Books.

Barbosa, D. (2008). Taxonomy Folksonomy Cookbook. Retrieved from.  http://solutions.dowjones.com/cookbook/ebook_sla2008/cookbookebook.pdf. 

Bishop, A. P. ; House, N.  A. and Van, Buttenfield, B (2003).  (Eds). Digital Library   Use:   Social   Practice   in   Design   and Evaluation. (MIT Press; Cambridge, MA). 

Candela, G.; Escobar, P. b. ; Rafael, C.; Carras and et. al. (2015). Migration of A Library Catalogue into RDA Linked Open Data. Semantic Web 0. (0) 1–12 IOS Press.

Chan, L. M (1994). Cataloging and classification: an introduction. 2^nd. Ed.  New York: McGraw-Hill.

Grant, D. C. (2011). RDA and RDF: A discourse analysis of two standards of resource description. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization. 3. Toronto. Canada.207-16.

Dion, H.; Lian G. ; Alton, C. and et. al. (2006). A   checklist   for   evaluating   open   source   digital   library software. Online   Information   Review, 30 (4), 360 – 379.

Feigenbaum, L.; Tonya, H. ; Eric, N. and Susie, S (2007). The Semantic Web in action. Scientific American November 19.

Fuhr, N. ; Tsakonas, G.; Aalberg, T and et. al. (2007). Evaluation   of   digital   libraries.  International Journal on Digital Libraries, 8(1) 21–38.

Kamlesh, R. L (2016). Semantic Digital Library. International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICAC-2016). College of Computing Sciences and Information Technology (CCSIT). Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad.

Manola, F. and Miller, E. (2004). RDF Primer World Wide Web Consortium. Availablehttp://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210.   

Manuja, M. and Garg, D (2011). Semantic Web Mining of Un-structured Data: Challenges and     Opportunities. International Journal of Engineering, 5(3),268-276.

Massis, B. E (2011). Serendipitous” browsing versus library space. New Library World. 112(3/4). 178-182.

O’Reilly, T. and Battelle, J (2009). Web squared: Web 2.0 five years on. A white  Paper produced for the 2009 Web 2.0 Summit. O’Reilly Media. Available http://assets.en.oreilly.com/1/event/28/web2009 _websquared-whitepaper.pdf

Pandey, S. and Panda, K. C (2014). Semantic solutions for the digital libraries based on semantic web technologies. Annals of Library and Information Studies , 61, 286-293.

Ahmad Khan, S.; Bhatti, R. (2018). Semantic Web and ontology-based applications for digital libraries: An investigation from LIS professionals in Pakistan. The Electronic Library.

Weinberger, D. (2012). Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren’t the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room. New York: Basic Books.