Investigating the factors affecting the provision of housing in Ishargari community from the perspective of housing sustainability indicators

Subject Areas : Urbanism

Mohsen Ghasempour Shalmani ¹ , Hossein Dehghani podeh ²

1 - PhD student in Geography and Urban Planning, Azad University, Science and Research Branch
2 - Associate Professor of Malek Ashtar

Received: 2024-04-28 Accepted : 2024-07-08 Published : 2024-06-26

Keywords: Housing sustainability, resilience, housing supply, selfless society, urbanization phenomenon,

Abstract :

Providing housing is one of the most basic issues of any country. This problem is a clear sign of economic and social realities and the imbalance between population growth and space growth. The expansion of the phenomenon of urbanization on the one hand and population growth on the other hand in the new economic era has caused the phenomenon of housing supply to be considered as one of the main problems of societies.This problem covers a wide range from the lack of housing and the need for cheap housing to the increasing demand for higher quality housing. For this reason, from the end of the 19th century onwards, one of the main axes of government intervention in the economy is the sector. It has been housing. In Iran, various construction and development programs have been carried out in order to reduce the housing problem.Housing or living space should be efficient in two ways. One of the material aspects, that is, creating an environment with access and suitable facilities, the right temperature, the right pressure, humidity, the right light, and the like, and the other in terms of responding to the spiritual needs of the people, that is, the creation of suitable spaces with the lifestyle and type in between. Time planning can lead to the acquisition of social culture and customs. Meanwhile, planning can improve residential satisfaction in providing housing for low-income groups. For this reason, the general purpose of the research is to investigate the factors affecting the provision of housing in the community of sacrificers from the perspective of housing sustainability indicators. In order to analyze the information, the fuzzy ANP method is used. The results show that the index of sustainable housing indicators (A3) is the closest to the positive ideal answer and the greatest distance from the negative ideal answer, and the first priority of the housing supply model of the self-sacrificing society from the perspective of housing sustainability indicators in terms of the desired criteria. It is a sacrifice for the resilience of the society's housing supply model from the point of view of housing sustainability indicators.

References:

[1] Zhang Q, Hiu-Kwan Yung E, Hon-Wan Chan E. Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China. Land. 2021 Nov 22;10(11):1280.
[2] Ogiemwonyi O. Factors influencing generation Y green behaviour on green products in Nigeria: An application of theory of planned behaviour. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 2022 Feb 1;13:100164.
[3] Raj PV, Teja PS, Siddhartha KS, Rama JK. Housing with low-cost materials and techniques for a sustainable construction in India-A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021 Jan 1;43:1850-5.
[4] Bravi L, Francioni B, Murmura F, Savelli E. Factors affecting household food waste among young consumers and actions to prevent it. A comparison among UK, Spain and Italy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2020 Feb 1;153:104586.
[5] Mayeda AM, Boyd AD. Factors influencing public perceptions of hydropower projects: A systematic literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020 Apr 1;121:109713.
[6] Wu JS, Font X, Liu J. The elusive impact of pro-environmental intention on holiday on pro-environmental behaviour at home. Tourism Management. 2021 Aug 1;85:104283.
[7] Fang K, Azizan SA, Wu Y. Low-carbon community regeneration in China: A case study in Dadong. Sustainability. 2023 Feb 24;15(5):4136.
[8] Chang S, Nam K. Smart home adoption: the impact of user characteristics and differences in perception of benefits. Buildings. 2021 Sep 3;11(9):393.
[9] Dimitrova T, Ilieva I, Angelova M. Exploring factors affecting sustainable consumption behaviour. Administrative Sciences. 2022 Nov 4;12(4):155.
[10] Carpino C, Bruno R, Arcuri N. Social housing refurbishment for the improvement of city sustainability: Identification of targeted interventions based on a disaggregated cost-optimal approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020 Sep 1;60:102223.
[11] Holmes MR, Dodds R, Frochot I. At home or abroad, does our behavior change? Examining how everyday behavior influences sustainable travel behavior and tourist clusters. Journal of Travel Research. 2021 Jan;60(1):102-16.
[12] Gayo EM, Muñoz AA, Maldonado A, Lavergne C, Francois JP, Rodríguez D, Klock‐Barría K, Sheppard PR, Aguilera‐Betti I, Alonso‐Hernández C, Mena‐Carrasco M. A cross‐cutting approach for relating anthropocene, environmental injustice and sacrifice zones. Earth's future. 2022 Apr;10(4):e2021EF002217.
[13] Rosen MA. Energy sustainability with a focus on environmental perspectives. Earth Systems and Environment. 2021 Jun;5(2):217-30.
[14] Hao Y, Wang Y, Wu Q, Sun S, Wang W, Cui M. What affects residents' participation in the circular economy for sustainable development? Evidence from China. Sustainable Development. 2020 Sep;28(5):1251-68.
[15] Jo TH, Ma JH, Cha SH. Elderly perception on the internet of things-based integrated smart-home system. Sensors. 2021 Feb 11;21(4):1284.
[16] Kalonda JK, Govender K. Factors affecting municipal service delivery: A case study of Katima Mulilo Town Council, Namibia. African Journal of Public Affairs. 2021 Aug 1;12(2):1-26.
[17] Rajabpour E, Fathi MR, Torabi M. Analysis of factors affecting the implementation of green human resource management using a hybrid fuzzy AHP and type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022 Jul;29(32):48720-35.
[18] Wakhidah N, Erman E. Examining environmental education content on Indonesian Islamic religious curriculum and its implementation in life. Cogent Education. 2022 Dec 31;9(1):2034244.
[19] Yadegaridehkordi E, Hourmand M, Nilashi M, Alsolami E, Samad S, Mahmoud M, Alarood AA, Zainol A, Majeed HD, Shuib L. Assessment of sustainability indicators for green building manufacturing using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. Journal of cleaner production. 2020 Dec 20;277:122905.
[20] Surya B, Saleh H, Suriani S, Sakti HH, Hadijah H, Idris M. Environmental pollution control and sustainability management of slum settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land. 2020 Aug 19;9(9):279.
[21] Yip AO, Mah DN, Barber LB. Revealing hidden energy poverty in Hong Kong: a multi-dimensional framework for examining and understanding energy poverty. Local Environment. 2020 Jul 2;25(7):473-91.
[22] Ignat B, Chankov S. Do e-commerce customers change their preferred last-mile delivery based on its sustainability impact?. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2020 Sep 3;31(3):521-48.
[23] Debrah C, Chan AP, Darko A. Green finance gap in green buildings: A scoping review and future research needs. Building and Environment. 2022 Jan 1;207:108443.
[24] Noorzai E, Gharouni Jafari K, Moslemi Naeni L. Lessons learned on selecting the best mass housing method based on performance evaluation criteria in Iran. International Journal of Construction Education and Research. 2022 Apr 3;18(2):123-41.
[25] Wang J, Wang S, Wang H, Zhang Z, Ru X. Examining when and how perceived sustainability-related climate influences pro-environmental behaviors of tourism destination residents in China. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2021 Sep 1;48:357-67.
[26] Mayer A, Castro-Diaz L, Lopez MC, Leturcq G, Moran EF. Is hydropower worth it? Exploring amazonian resettlement, human development and environmental costs with the Belo Monte project in Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science. 2021 Aug 1;78:102129.
[27] Du J, Pan W. Examining energy saving behaviors in student dormitories using an expanded theory of planned behavior. Habitat international. 2021 Jan 1;107:102308.
[28] Kim E, Kyung Y. Factors affecting the adoption intention of new electronic authentication services: A convergent model approach of VAM, PMT, and TPB. IEEE Access. 2023 Feb 8;11:13859-76.
[29] Ufaira R, Amir S, Indraprahasta GS, Nastiti A. Living in a hot city: Thermal justice through green open space provision. Frontiers in Human Dynamics. 2023 Oct 3;5:1237515.
[30] Fakher, H.A., Panahi, M., Emami, K., Peykarjou, K. and Zeraatkish, S.Y., 2021. Investigating marginal effect of economic growth on environmental quality based on six environmental indicators: does financial development have a determinative role in strengthening or weakening this effect?. Environmental science and pollution research, 28(38), pp.53679-53699.
[31] Yuan M, Li Z, Li X, Li L, Zhang S, Luo X. How to promote the sustainable development of prefabricated residential buildings in China: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022 May 15;349:131423.
[32] Lim XJ, Ng SI, Basha NK, Cheah JH, Ting H. To move or not to move? A study of sustainable retirement village in Malaysia. Current Psychology. 2020 Apr 18:1-7.