Iran Nuclear Security Dilemma from the Perspective of Neo-Realism
Subject Areas : International Relations
Reza Simbar
1
(International Relations Department, Guilan University, Iran)
Reza Rahmdel
2
(International Relations Department, Guilan University, Iran)
Mahsa Fallah
3
(Political Science Department, Guilan Uni, Iran)
Keywords: Keywords: Neo-realism, Nuclear Conundrum, Balance fail, Structural hegemony, Comprehensive agreement,
Abstract :
Abstract Our study focuses on neo-realism has Iran Nuclear Conundrum and lack of agreement on a nuclear Marathon. Anarchic structure of the international system after the events of September eleventh causes a turning point in the international system for the world. Iran tried against the hegemonic power structure of the international system as a resistance range with respect to that coordinates ideological foreign policy spending. The balance of power created after September eleventh exorbitant fees established for Iran sanctions, aerospace, nuclear, oil, international and even took International Economic Exchanges. Nevertheless the issues of Iran’s nuclear powers were causing a disagreement with powerful countries. We tried using neo-realist theory to get the answer security Conundrum of Iran nuclear program.
منابع:
- بیلس، جان، استیو، اسمیت. (1383). جهانی شدن سیاست: روابط بین الملل در عصر نوین. ترجمه ابوالقاسم راه چمنی و دیگران، جلد اول، تهران : انتشارات ابرار معاصر.
- هانتر، شیرین. (1392). سیاست خارجی ایران در دوران بعد از فروپاشی شوروی. ترجمه مهدی ذوالفقاری، تهران: نشر میزان.
- هنسن، برث، پیتر تافت و آندره ویول. (1390). راهبردهای امنیتی و نظم جهانی آمریکائی: قدرت از دست رفته. ترجمه سید امیر نیاکویی و احمد جانسیز، رشت: انتشارات دانشگاه گیلان.
- سنایی، مهدی، فاطمه، عطری سنگری. (1390). «مقایسه سیاست خارجی ایران و روسیه در آسیای مرکزی». مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، ش 9.
- نصری، قدیر. (1386). «روش شناخت در مکتب نئورئالیسم». فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی، شماره دوم، مسلسل 36.
- نیاکویی، سید امیر. (1392). «بررسی بحران های عراق و سوریه در پرتو نظریه های امنیتی». فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی سیاست جهانی، دانشگاه گیلان، شماره سوم.
- Afrasiabi, Kaveh L. (2006). Iran's Nuclear Program: Debating Facts Versus Fiction. (Frist Published), United states, Boston: Book surge.
- Auten, Brian J. (2008). Carter's Conversion: The Hardening of American Defense Policy(Frist Published). United States, Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
- Butler, Michael J. (2009). International Conflict Management. Canada: Routledge Publisher.
- Cordesman, Anthony & Khalid R. Al-Rodhan. (2006). Iran's Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Real and Potential Threat. Canada, Csis Publisher.
- Hunter, Shireen T. (2010). Iran’s foreign policy in the post-soviet era: resisting the international order. California: Santa Barbara ABC-CLIO Publisher.
- Juneau, Thomas & Razavi Sam. (2013). Iranian Foreign Policy Since 2001: Alone in the World. Canada: Routledge Publisher.
- Kerr, Paul K. (2010). Iran's Nuclear Program: Status. New York: DIANE Publishing.
- Kramer, Heinz. (2001). A Changing Turkey: The Challenge to Europe and the United States. Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press Publisher.
- Leverett, Flynt & Mann Leverett, Hillary. (2013). Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran.Macmillan Publisher.
- Mabon, Simon. (2013). Saudi Arabia and Iran: Soft Power Rivalry in the Middle East. London: I.B.Tauris Publisher.
- Nau, Henry R. & Deepa M. Ollapally. (2012). World Views of Aspiring Powers: Domestic Foreign Policy Debates in China, India, Iran, Japan, and Russia.Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Resende-Santos, Joao. (2007). Neorealism, States, and the Modern Mass Army. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Thaler, David E. & Alireza Nader, Shahram Chubin, Jerrold D. Green, Charlotte Lynch. (2010). Mullahs, Guards, and Bonyads: An Exploration of Iranian Leadership Dynamics. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation Publisher.
- Rittberger, Volker. (2001). German Foreign Policy Since Unification: Theories and Case Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
_||_