Effect of time and values of methanol foliation on growth and yield of Coker 347 type tobacco

Subject Areas : New Finding in Agriculture

Kaveh Sabokroo ¹ , mohmad taghi Safarzade ² , mehdi Ranjbar Choobe ³ , jahanfar Daneshian ⁴ , Kamyar Sabokroo ⁵

1 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد زراعت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تاکستان و عضو باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان
2 - استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت
3 - موسسه تحقیقات توتون رشت
4 - دانشیار موسسه تهیه و اصلاح نهال و بذر کرج و دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تاکستان
5 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد زراعت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تاکستان

Received: 2015-12-02 Accepted : 2015-12-02 Published : 2010-04-21

Keywords: growth, yield, Time, Methanol, Tobacco, value,

Abstract :

    To investigating the effect ofmethanol on growth and yield of Coker 347 type tobacco afactorial design basedon RCBD with 4 replications and 18 traits was don during 2008-2009. Factors wereconsidered as the methanol consumption time in as first factor which was consistof three solution spreading surface in the morning (Time 8-10 am) (T1) and noon(Time 12-14) (T2) and sunset (Time 17-19pm) (T3) and the second factor was theamount of methanol consumption as 0, 30, 20, 10, 40, 50 volume percent ofmethanol. Solution spreading of methanol during the growing seaso nrespectively performed at the beginning terms of quick transplants growth,blossom origination and 30 days before illustrating of tobacco plants. Tobaccoproduct harvested in three sorts. Results showed that the LA, chlorophyll andthe plant height became significant at the interaction effect of the twofactors (p<1%) but the number of leaf in interaction effect becamesignificant at p<5%. Sugar and Nicotine became significant at the factor B (p<5%)but leaf dry weight becomes no significant. Therefore, regarding to theseresults methanol enhances the quality and quantity of tobacco plant

References:

 

۱- اوانز، ای. تی. ۱۳۷۷. تکامل. سازگاری و عملکرد گیاهان زراعی . ترجمه  رحیمیان، ح.  کوچکی، ع . و زند، الف.   نشرآموزش کشاورزی.            

2- صفرزاده ویشگایی، م. ن.، نورمحمدی، ق.، مجیدی، الف. و ربیعی، ب. ۱۳۸۶. اثر متانول بر رشد وعملکرد بادام زمینی. علوم کشاورزی . سال سیزدهم ( ۱ ).

3- خدابنده، ن . ۱۳۸۵. زراعت گیاهان صنعتی. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

4- خواجه پور، م. ر. ۱۳۸۵. گیاهان صنعتی. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.

5- رنجبر چوبه، م. ۱۳۸۴. تولید، عمل آوری و ارزیابی توتون های گرمخانه ای. ایستگاه تحقیقات توتون رشت.

6- مصباح، م. ۱۳۸۵. عملیات زراعی موثر بر کیفیت توتون گرمخانه ای. ایستگاه تحقیقات توتون رشت.

7- Albrecht, S. L., Douglas, C. L., Klepper, E. L., Rasmussen, P. E., Rickman, R. W., Smiley, R. W.,   Wysocki, D. W. and Wilkins, D. E. 1995. Effects of foliar methanol application on crop yield. Crop Sci. 35: 1642–1646. 

8- Bhattacharya, S., Bhattacharya, N. C. and Bhatnagar, B. B. 1985. Effect of ethanol. methanol and acetone on rooting etiolated cuttings of Vigna radiata in presence of  Vigna radiate in presence of sucrose and auxin. Ann. Bot. 55:143-145.

9- Davis, D. and Nielsen, M. 1999. Tobacco production chemistry and technology.coresta Blackwell science Ltd.

10- Devlin, M., Bhowmik, P. C.  and Karczmarczyk, S. J. 1994. Influence of methanol on plant germination and growth. Plant Growth Regul. Soc. Am. Q. 22: 102– 108.

11-Downie, A., Miyazaki, S., Bohnert, H., John, P., Coleman, J., Parry, M. and Haslam, R. 2004. Expression profiling of the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to methanol stimulation. PHytochem. 65: 2305–2316.

12- Fall, R. and Benson, A. A. 1996. Leaf methanol—the simplest natural product from  plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 296–301.    

13- Faver. K. L. and Gerik, T. J. 1996. Foliar-applied methanol effects on  cotton  (Gossypium hirsutum L.) gas exchange and growth. Field Crops Res. 47: 227–234.

14- Feibert, E. B. G., games, S. R., Rykbost, K. A., Mitchell, A. R. and shock, C. C. 1995. potato yield and quality not changed by foliar applied methanol. Hortsci.30(3) : 494-495.

15-Galbally, E. and Kirstine, W. 2002. The Production of Methanol by Flowering Plants and the Global Cycle of Methanol. J. Atmos. Chem : 43(3):195-229.146:193-198. Physiol

16-Hemming, D. and Criddle, R. 1995. Effects of methanol on plant respiration Plant

17-Karaivazoglou, N. A., Papakosta, D, K. and Divanidis, S. 2005. Effect of chloride in Irrigation water and form of nitrogen fertilizer on Virginia tobacco -  Field crops research 92(2005)61-74.

18-Knottnerus, J. A. 2006. methanol. evoulution of the effect on reoroduction. recommendation for classification. health council of the Netherlands committee for compound toxic to reproduction no 2006/04osh.

19-Kotzabasis, K., Hatziathanasiou, A.,  Bengoa-Ruigomez, M. V., Kentouri, M. and Divanach, P. 1999. Methanol as alternative carbon source for quicker efficient production of the microalgae Chlorella minutissima: role of the concentration and frequence of administration. J. Biotechnol. 70:357- 362.

20-Li.y. Gupta, j. and siyumbano, a. k. 1995. effect of methanol on soybean photosynthesis and chlorophyll -  j.plant nutr – 18: 1875-1880.

21-Madhaiyan. T., Poonguzhali, S., Sundaram, S. and Sa, T. 2006. A new insight into foliar applied methanol influencing pHylloplane ethylotropHic dynamics and growth promotion of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Env. Exp. Bot. 57: 168–176.

22-Makhdum, M. I., Malik, M. N. A., Din, S. U., Ahmad, F. and Chaudhry, F. I. 2002. Physiological response of cotton to methanol foliar application. J. Res. (Sci.) 13: 37–43. 

23-Moustakas, N. K. and Ntzanis, H. 2005. Dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake in Flue cured Tobacco. Field crop research 94(2005) 1-13.

24-Nemecek-Marshall, M., MacDonald, R. C., Franzen, J. C., Wojciechowski, L. and Fall, R. 1995. Methanol emission from leaves: enzymatic detection of gas-pHase methanol and relation of methanol fluxes to stomatal conductance and leaf development. Plant PHysiol. 108: 1359-1368.

25-Nonomora, A. M. and Benson, A. A. 1992.  The path of carbon in photosynthesis: improved crop yield with methanol – Proc. natl. Acad. sci. Usa 89:9794-9798.

26-Omer, Z., Tombolini, R. and Gerhardson, B. 2006. Plant colonization by pink-pigmented facultative methylotropHic bacteria (PPFMs). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 46:319–326.

27-Ramberg, H. A., Bradley, J. S., Olson, J. S., Nishio,  J. N., Markwell, J. and Osterman, J. C. 2002. The Role of Methanol in Promoting Plant Growth: An Update. Rev. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 1:113-126.

28-Ramirez. I., Dorta, F., Espinoza, V.,  Jimenez, E., Mercado, A. and Pen a-Cortes, H. 2006. Effects of foliar and  root applications of methanol on the growth of Arabidopsis  tobacco and tomato plants. J  Plant Growth  Regul.

 25: 30–44.

29-TC.Tso. production. physiology and biochemistry of tobacco plant. institute of international development and education in agricultural andlife sciences. USA.

30-Wang, X., Shen, J.  and Liao, H. 2010. Acquisition or utilization. which is more critical for enhancing phosphorus efficiency in modern crops? – Plant science 179(2010) 302-304.

31-Xiao-Tang. J., Feng-chun, C., chun-gian, l., Rong-feng, J., Christie, P. and Fu-suo, Z. 2008. yield and nicotine content of flue cured tobacco as affected by soil nitrogen mineralization – Pedosphere 18(2):227-235.

 32-Zbiec, I., Karczmarczyk, S .and  Podsiadło, C. 2003. Response of some cultivated plants to methanol as compared to supplemental irrigation. Elec. J. Polish Agri. Univer. Agronomy. 6 (1): 1-7.

33-Zhengxiong, Z., Chunjian, L., Yuhong, Y. and Fusuo, Z. 2010. Why Does potassium concentration in a flue cured Tobacco leaves decrease after apex excision? – Field crops research 116(2010) 86-91.