The presentation of comprehensive plan for organizing and improvement in Kashafrud River

Subject Areas : WATER RESOURCES

vahid yazdani ¹ , Hosein Alimirzaei ²

1 - Ph.D in Water Engineering, Research assistant the Kavosh Pey Mashhad Soil and Water Research Institute explored, Mashhad, Iran
2 - Wastewater Management Plan, Khorasan province & PhD Student at Water Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran., Iran.

Received: 2017-02-19 Accepted : 2017-09-03 Published : 2018-02-20

Keywords: Flood, Mashhad, Parkand-Abad, Water Treatment,

Abstract :

Abstract  Understanding the river behavior and the activities compatible with their nature and suitable engineering activities are always the main concerns in agricultural sciences. The main purpose of this paper is the presentation of comprehensive plan for organizing and betterment in Kashafrud RiverbetweenParkand-abad wastewater treatment and Olang wastewater treatment due to the value of this river in this location. So, by using the GIS technology and digits software the physiographic parameters are analyzed in Arc-view and Arc-Gis in 1:250000 scale. The distance between Parkand-abad wastewater treatment to the end of the studied area because of the best condition in all aspect for farming and potager’s products the agricultural land is valuable, so there are clear human activities in riparian which is critical. Based on the result of the anchored wall in upstream is 1.75RS and equal to 3.5 m and the anchored wall in downstream is 2RS and equal to 4 m. In order to the structural consideration in the increase of stilling basin in distal anchors with increasing the depth of them are considered 1.5 in height and stoned anchored wall is designed 2.5 m. the results are shown that the maximum amount of 25 years discharge in Kashafrud River is 2.6m/s. Across the river based on terraces in riparian and the erosional river studies in this river, four classes are determined. The area of river which erosion bank more than 50 percent is suggested the best site for implementation of geotextile.

References:

1. Afzalimehr, H. and Dey, S., 2009, Influence of Bank Vegetation and Gravel Bed on Velocity and Reynolds Stress Distributions, International Journal of Sediment Research, Vol. 24, PP. 236-246


2. Behbahani,m.R., 2001, Surface water hydrology. Tehran University Press. 484Pp.


3. Bertrand, F. and Papanicolaou, A. N., 2009, Effects of Freezing and Thawing Process on Bank Stability, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress: Great Rivers, New Mexico


4. Choudhury, M., 2002, Flood Routing in River Network Using Equivalent Muskingum Inflow. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 7(6); 413-419.


5. Cook, A.C., 2008, Comparison of one-dimensional HEC-RAS with two – dimensional FESWMS model in flood inundation mapping. MSc thesis, Purdue university, USA


6. Jafarzadeh Haghighi, N.A. Basim, Y and Afshari, M. 2004. Case study: Karun river Reorganization Plan - a new way in the Environmental Assessment, Journal of Geographical Research, 74:1-17.


7. Kaufmann, R., Faustini, M., Larsen, P., Shirazi, A., 2008, A Roughness-corrected Index of Relative Bed Stability for Regional Stream Surveys, Geomorphology, Vol. 99:150- 170.


8. Lim, S.Y., 2001. Parametric study of riprap failure around bridge piers. Journal of hydraulic research. 39(1): 61-72.


9. Mahdavi, M. 2003. Applied Hydrology, Third edition,Volume II, Tehran University Press, 401Pp.


10. Minghui, Y., Hongyan, W., Yanjie, L., and Chunyan, H., 2010, Study on th Stability of Noncohesive River Bank, International Journal of Sediment Research, 25 ( 4): 391–398.


11. Mosaedi, A., 2003, Study of factors increasing flood damages in the north of Iran on august 2001 and 2002. Geophysical Research Abstracts. 5:03945.


12. Orfeo, O., and Stevaux, J., 2002, Hydraulic and Morpholgical Characteristics of Middle and Upper Reaches of the Parana River (Argentina and Brazil), Geomorphology, 44 (.5): 309-322.


13. Tokaldany, E. A., Darby, S. E. and Tosswell, P., 2007, Coupling Bank Stability and Bed Deformation Models to Predict Equilibrium Bed Topography in River Bends, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133 (10):1167-1170.

14. Sadeghi, S.H.R. 1997. Review and assessment of factors affecting flood control, Journal of Forest and Range, 29:54-61

1. SCS., 1985, Natural Engineering Handbook, Section ,8, Flood Routing, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C : 175Pp.


2. SHAW, E.M., 1994, Hydrology in Practice. T.J. Press (Pads tow) LTD, Cornwall, UK: 546 Pp.


3. Stephen, R., 2002, Hydrologic investigation by the USGS following the 1996 and 1997 flood in the upper Yellowstone river, Montana. American water resources association, 19th annual Montana section meeting, section one: 1-18.


4. Stephen, P., Rice, Jill Lancaster and Paul Kemp, P., 2010, Experimentation at the Interface of Fluvial Geomorphology, Stream Ecology and Hydraulic Engineering and the Development of an Effective, Interdisciplinary River Science, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35: 64-77.


5. Stevenson, D., 2009. 1D Hec RAS model and sensivity analysis for River Clair from 1971- 2007, report prepared for international joint commission, international upper Great lakes study, Ottawa:1-57.


6. Vatanfada, J. 2003. Review the flood situation in Iran, issues and problems, Proceedings of the seminar on the prevention and reduction of flood, 302-313.


7. Yang, C.R., and Tsai, C.T., 2000, Development of a GIS based flood information system for floodplain management and damage calculation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 36(3):567-577.