Reflection of Mystical Themes in Newly Found Zahir Kermani’s Masnavi (Couplet)
Subject Areas : Islamic MysticismPari Maalmali 1 , Ahmadreza Yalameh 2 , Parisa Davari 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی، واحد دهاقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دهاقان، ایران.
2 - استاد گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، واحد دهاقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دهاقان، ایران. نویسنده مسئول:
ayalameha@yahoo.com
3 - استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، واحد دهاقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دهاقان، ایران.
Keywords:
Abstract :
Zahir Kermani, the Shiite poet and literary man, lived in Kerman during the twelfth century AH. There are four works left by this poet: Masnavi, Golshan Zohour, Majmaul Bahrain, Vameghi and Ezra. His Masnavi was mistakenly mentioned at the introduction of Divan in handwritten copies. It includes 8743 couplets. Most of his couplets form ethical and religious contents. The language is largely simple, fluent, and intelligible. Zahir primarily helps from wisdom to understand and comprehend mystical matters at the stage of recognition. He deems asceticism, hypocrisy, pretension, and sin as an obstacle over the course of sublimity and understanding of humankind, for which her recommends controlling one’s soul as a remover of the obstacle. He believes that realistic individuals refuse hypocrisy. In addition, asceticism is a weapon for controlling soul; and the purity and truthfulness of humankind versus repentance creates a shield against the evolution of human soul. Thereafter, for its evolution the soul goes on a spiritual journey through the wings of love beyond its wisdom. He is the representative of honesty and certainty so that he makes every effort to live in reality and gain the Almighty satisfaction. He is a personage that by means of asceticism assumes God to be watching over his actions even in his loneliness and veil, and when encountered with sensitive situations, he trembles and responds negatively so that this turning away holds a lot of consequences and results. He presumes repentance to be turning back from sin and compensation of wrongdoing. He believes that the one who walks the course of guidance will eventually arrive at destination whereas the one who picks out deviation or aberration will arrive at failure and disgrace.
_||_