A Survey of the Political Corruption and its Relation with the Political Development from the Political Sociology’s point of view

Subject Areas : sociology

Parviz Ahadi ¹ , Mohammad Ghafarian Gabelou ² , Aziz Javanpour ³ , Samad Noojavan ⁴

1 - گروه علوم سیاسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی؛ تبریز– ایران (نویسنده مسئول).
2 - گروه حقوق، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی؛ تبریز– ایران.
3 - گروه علوم سیاسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی؛ تبریز– ایران.
4 - دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی؛ تبریز– ایران.

Received: 2018-08-20 Accepted : 2018-10-10 Published : 2018-10-23

Keywords: political development, political corruption, political sociology, political development factors,

Abstract :

Josef Nay considers the political development as a preservation oflegitimacy of a political system within a given period and regards its factorsthe law domination, responsiveness, clarity, verification, politicalcompetition, free and fair elections along with their institutionalization.Failure to control and restrict corruption will usually endanger thetransition to political development. The lack of political development hasled to an increase in political corruption, and their relationship will berepeated in a series of cycles over the course of many periods. In this study,the concept of political corruption is the abuse of power delegated bypolitical and governmental agents in order to provide personal gain withthe aim of increasing power or wealth. In this study, political corruptionand its relation to political development from the political sociologyperspective have been examined in a documentary method. It has beenconcluded that political corruption brings lack of development and lack ofdevelopment, reciprocate political corruption. Political corruption has anegative influence on the process of political development and providesthe basic challenges for the political system and its citizens. Politicalcorruption also reduces citizen's trust in the system and will reduce thelegitimacy of political system.

References:

ازکیا، مصطفی. (1380). جامعه­شناسی توسعه. تهران: نشر کلمه.

رﺍﻏﻔﺮ، ﺣﺴﯿﻦ. (1387). ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎد ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ ﻓﺴﺎد، ﻣﺠﻠﺲ و ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ. سال 14، شماره 58.

راش، مایکل. (1383). جامعه و سیاست، مقدمه­ای بر جامعه­شناسی سیاسی. مترجم: منوچهر، صبوری. تهران: انتشارات سمت.

سریع­القلم، محمود. (1372). عقل و توسعه یافتگی. تهران: نشر سفیر.

ﺻﺒﺎﺣﯽ، ﺍﺣﻤﺪ؛ و ﺳﻌﯿﺪ، ﻣﻠﮏ­ﺍﻟﺴﺎدﺍﺗﯽ. (1388). ﺍﺛﺮ ﮐﻨﺘﺮل ﻓﺴﺎد ﻣﺎﻟﯽ ﺑﺮ رﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎدی، ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﯽ. شماره 53.

ﻟﻄﻔﯿﺎن، ﺳﻌﯿﺪه. (1385). ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎی ﺍﻣﻨﯿﺘﯽ ﻓﺴﺎد  ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎدی- ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ در ﮐﺸﻮرﻫﺎی در ﺣﺎل ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ، ﻣﺠﻠﻪ داﻧﺸﮑﺪه ﺣﻘﻮق و ﻋﻠﻮم ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ. شماره 71.

Azfar and Others. (2010). The Causes and Consequences of Corruption.  AAPSS. N. 573.

Joseph s., Nye. corruption and political Development: A Cost-Benefit source, The American political science Review. vol. 67, no. 2, (Jun 1967), P.p: 417-427. Published by: American political science Association.

Michel, coppedge and John, Goring / 254, 2011 June, 2011 / vol 9 / no, 2. Perspectives on politics. P.p: 254-255.

Waren, M. (2005). Democracy Against corruption. Voskanyon R. 2000. A Study of the effects of corruption on economic and polities Development of Armenia. Amundsen. Q 1999 Politic corruption. An Introduction to the I sues.