Compilation of performance management system and environmental improvement and providing the best combination of oil and gas holding strategy based on BSC, fuzzy AHP, and game theory
Subject Areas : Environmental pollutions (water, soil and air)mehdi khajavi 1 , mohammad reza motadel 2 , Mohammad Ali Afshar kazimi 3
1 - Department of Industrial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Eslay Azad University, Tehran, Iran. *(Corresponding Author)
2 - ¬Department of Industrial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Eslay Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 - Department of Industrial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Performance management, holding, performance measurement, performance evaluation, environmental improvement, game theory, Shepley's value,
Abstract :
Background and Objective: Considering the extent of oil and gas industries and the effective role of these industries in causing environmental pollution, it is necessary to formulate a strategic plan for managing the performance of environmental improvement. In this article, the formulation of the performance management system and environmental improvement by presenting the best combination of oil and gas holding strategy based on BSC, fuzzy AHP, game theory, and in fact the purpose of this article is to present a model that utilizes the capabilities of The goals of the balanced scorecard landscape and game theory are to allow organizational planners to make changes due to economic, political and critical policies in their organization's strategic and executive planning.
Material and Methodology: considering that this researcher investigates a scientific problem using the theoretical and fundamental research of others to apply it in the real world, therefore, the current research is qualitative and practical in terms of purpose. In terms of the nature of data collection, it is also a case study and falls within the scope of descriptive research. The statistical population of this research is all senior managers of Nagar Sanat Petrochemical Oil and Gas Holding and CEOs of its subsidiaries. After determining the key objectives of evaluating the performance of balanced scorecard landscapes based on previous research literature, the fuzzy AHP method, the Likert spectrum tool and also determining the map of related objectives in each landscape, the proposed strategies and different combinations of its different aspects are available to a working group 5. Some of the experts of oil, gas and petrochemical holdings have been appointed and based on their valuable experiences in that industry and on the basis of the final strategy map and beta coefficients of the path obtained in the estimation of the model, the amount of usefulness resulting from the implementation of each strategy and the combination of several strategies numerically assigned between 0 and 5.
Findings: Based on the possible results of each strategy proposal in the landscape of the balanced score card and the application of the theory of cooperative games and the Shepley value obtained for the players, the order of their strength and sensitivity in coalitions is obtained as C>L>I>F, the best strategy combination with The highest coefficient of desirability in order to achieve the ultimate goals of the organization reached the combination of the C3L3I2F2 strategy, which is the customer perspective (focusing on the methods of obtaining customer satisfaction), the growth and learning perspective (focusing on acquiring knowledge in the field of improving activities through increasing the technical knowledge of specialists) and the internal process perspective. The establishment of order management systems in order to increase the efficiency of ordering processes (internal process) (planning to increase revenues by reducing overhead costs) showed the best benefit. Among the goals identified from the customer's point of view in this research is penetration in new markets, which has the most direct effect on increasing revenue with a beta coefficient of 0.774.
Discussion and Conclusion: The environmental performance management system is a part of a management system that includes the required structure, planning, activities, responsibilities, methods, processes and resources for the purpose of developing, implementing, reviewing and maintaining the policy. environment are used.
1. FARMER W (2023). Smartening, an approach to realizing sustainable urban development (case study: District 6 of Tehran). Human Geography Research (Geographic Research), 51(1), 145-157.
2. Nian, D. (2023). Moderating effect of supply chain dynamic capabilities on the relationship of sustainable supply chain management practices and organizational sustainable performance: A study on the restaurant industry in Indonesia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM), 9(1), 97-105.
3. Cordova M, Coronado F (2021) Supply chain innovation and sustain ability frontiers: a balanced scorecard perspective. In: Park SH, Gonzalez-Perez MA, Floriani DE (eds) The palgrave handbook of corporate sustainability in the digital era. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 479–501
4. Dinçer H, Yüksel S, Ubay GG, Karakuş H (2020) BSC-based evalu ation for the factors afecting the performance of wind energy companies. In: Dincer H, Yüksel S (eds) Strategic priorities in competitive environments: multidimensional approaches for busi ness success. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–15
5. Khan SAR, Godil DI, Yu Z et al (2022) Adoption of renewable energy sources, low-carbon initiatives, and advanced logistical infra structure—an step toward integrated global progress. Sustain Dev 30:275–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2243
6. Lee S, Costello FJ, Lee KC (2021) Hierarchical balanced scorecard based organizational goals and the efciency of controls pro cesses. J Bus Res 132:270–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusr es.2021.04.038
7. Hegazy, M. Hegazy, K. Eldeeb, M. “Te balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance evaluation in auditing frms,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 902–927, 2022.
8. Karbasi Yazdi M, Hosseini, M (2022), evaluating the performance of oil and gas companies using the developed balanced scorecard and the best and worst hesitant fuzzy method. Oil and Gas and Energy Monthly; Autumn 1401_Number 131.88-122
9. Gonzalez Felix puime Guillén•Jorge Eduardo Vila Biglieri. 2023.Environmentalstrategyand the petroleum industry: a sustainability scorecard approach. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology (2023) 13:763–774 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01543-9
10. Pirnay L, Burnay C (2022) How to build data-driven strategy maps? A methodological framework proposition. Data Knowl Eng. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2022.102019
11. Jassem S, Zakaria Z, Che Azmi A (2021) Sustainability balanced scorecard architecture and environmental performance outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Product Perform Manage. https://doi. org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0582
12. Elkanayati RM, Shamah R (2019) Could the balanced scorecard enhance pharmaceutical organisations’ quality performance? Ind Commer Train 51:256–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/ ICT-07-2018-0060
13. Fallah Dashti SH (2022). The effect of human resource management on environmental performance with the role of internal environmental orientation and organizational citizenship behavior (a case study of employees of the 11th district of Tehran Municipality). Quarterly Journal of Accounting and Management Perspectives, 5, No. 61, Summer 1401 (Volume II).
14. Chutcheva YV, Kuprianova LM, Seregina AA and Kukushkin SN (2022), Environmental management of companies in the oil and gas markets based on AI for sustainable development: An international review. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:952102. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.952102
15. Elbanna S, Kamel H, Fatima T, Eid R (2022) An investigation of the causality links in the balanced scorecard: the case of the Gulf Cooperation Council hospitality industry. Tourism Manage Per spect 41:100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100934
16. Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2019). A conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Business & Society, 48(2), 243–256
17. Dong W, Zhao G, Yüksel S et al (2022) A novel hybrid decision mak ing approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects. Renewable Energy 185:321–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene. 2021.12.077