Contribution of heredity and environment in creativity high school students in Tehran

Subject Areas :

Elmira  Zarea ¹ (دانشجو)
Hasan  Pasha Sharifi ² (استاد تمام)
Nasrin  Bagheri ³ (استاد)

Received: 2016-01-02 Accepted : 2016-03-04 Published : 2016-03-04

Keywords: Students, creativity, Key words: contribution, heredity environment,

Abstract :

The study was performed aimed to determine the contribution of heredity and environment in creativity high school students in Tehran. For this purpose, the available sampling method, 32 identical twins, 32 non-identical twins and 32 siblings were selected. As well as multistage random sampling method, 110 students were selected from among high school students in Tehran. To collect data, abed creativity questionnaire (TC) was used. For the analysis of the data, descriptive and inferential statistics (person correlation coefficient, independent t) was used. The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient showed that, there is a correlation 0/60 between identical twins. The correlation creativity in non‌identical twins in a negative way, and in siblings showed no correlation. This difference may be due to differences intheir environment. The results of linear regression analysis showed that 37 percent change in the creativity score the second pair by first pair identical twins is unjustified. But this amount is about 27 percent of non-identical twins. The difference is in the explanation may be related to heredity. Conclusion: although the role of heredity in creativity but it seems environment has a greater role than genetics in the emergence of creativity. This subject about siblings and non-identical twins in this study was shown

References:

Amabile T. M. (1989). Personality Processes andIndividual Differences. Journal of Personality and SocialsPsychology. 45(2).

Andereasen, N.C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: prevalence vates in writers and their first degree relatives. American journal of psychiatry. 144,1288-1298.

Carson, Shelley (2011). Creativity and Psychopathology: A Shared- vulnerability model.canadian

Journal of psychiatry. 53(3), 144-153.

Haigh, M. (2003). Enhancing creativity through investigative practical work in science. Paper presented at the association of research in education 2003 conference. Available at: http://www.aure-edu.au/03pap/haio3263.pdf.

Hosing, H. (2006). A synthetic analysis of effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity research journal. 18(4),435-446.

Koh. (2006). Reviewing the link between creativity and madness a postmodern perspective.eds cational research and reviews. 1(7).

Meadow, A. & Parnes, S. (1959).evaluation of training in creative problem solving. Journal of applied psychology. 43(3),: 189-194.

Moore, D.W. ;Bhadelia, R.A. ;Billingsm, R. L. ;Fulwiler, C. Heilman, K.M. ;Rood, K.M.J. etal. (2009). Hemispheric connectivity and thevisual- spatial divergent-thinking component of creativity. Journal brain and cognition. 70, 267-272.

Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotype and mental health amongst poets. Visual artists and mattematicians. Journal of research in personality. Vol 40.

Reuter, M. ;Panksepp, J. ;Schnabel, N. ;Kellerhoff, N. ;Kempel, P. & Hennig. J. (2005). Personality and biological markers of creativity. Eur+98opean journal of personality. 19, 83-95.

Simeonova, D.I. ;Charg, K.D. ;Strong, C. & Kethr, T.A. (2005). Creativity in familiar bipolar.journal of psychiatres. 36, 623-631.

Souza, F. ;Renzuli, D. & Westberg, J. (2002). Effects of a creativity training program on divergent thinking abilities and self-concept in monolingual and bilingual classrooms. Creativity research journal. 14, 373-386.

Torrance.E.P. (1974). Norms-technical manual Torrance test of creative thinking. Minisota UN press.