Genetic potential evaluation of Iranian corn Inbred lines using griffing diallel and AMMI model

Subject Areas : agronomy

Received: 2014-05-12 Accepted : 2015-11-11 Published : 2017-03-05

Keywords: heritability, Combining ability, Heterosis, Corn (Zea mays L.),

Abstract :

Estimation of genetic diversity, combining ability and heterosis of maize inbred lines for breeding aims are very important and would determine breeding strategies. In order[dfp1]  to estimate potential genetic Iranian corn inbred lines using diallel and AMMI methods, fourteen corn inbred lines cross were studied according to diallel scheme. Parents and their hybrids were evaluated in 2007 at Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, using Randomized Complete Block design with three replications. Results indicated that Significant differences (p<0.01) were observed among the genotypes for all studied traits, therefore Griffing’s method 2, model 1 was chosen for subsequent diallel analysis. Variances due to GCA and SCA were significant for all studied traits (P < 0.01). Results indicated that for number of kernel row per ear, 100 seed weight, cob percent and kernel moisture percent additive gene effects were more important than the non additive ones, but for grain yield, plant height, ear height, ear diameter, number of kernel per row and number of kernel per ear non additive gene effects were more important than the additive ones. For ear length and kernel weight per ear, importance of additive and non additive gene effects was the same. The best AMMI model for yield was AMMI3 explained 75.6% of interaction variance. The best general combinatory for yield were K166B, K3615/2 and K3653 lines. The highest specific combining ability and mid-parent heterosis for yield according to Griffing, first and second AMMI components, was observed in MO17 × K3653, K166B × K3653, K166B × K3653, A679 × K3544/1 and K3653 × K3493/1.  [dfp1]این رو فقط یه نگاه کلی کنید ممنونم

References:

1. چوکان، ر. 1381. تجزیه ژنتیکی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه ذرت. مجله نهال و بذر، 18 (2): 178-170.


2. چوکان، ر. و مساوات، س. ا. 1384. بررسی نحوه عمل ژن صفات مختلف لاین‌های محک ذرت. با استفاده از تلاقی‌های دای‌آلل. نهال و بذر. جلد 21 (4): 560 - 547.


3. حداد، ر. 1369. بررسی پاره‌ای از خصوصیات ژنتیکی لاین‌های ذرت به روش دای‌آلل. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، 122 صفحه.


4. دهقانپور، ز. 1373. بررسی و تعیین هتروزیس و ترکیب پذیری در ذرت دانه سفید. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد اصلاح نباتات. دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تبریز. 164 صفحه.


5. رضایی، ع.، یزدی صمدی، ب.، زالی، ع.، رضایی، ع.، طالعی، ع. و زینالی، ح. 1384. برآورد هتروزیس و ترکیب‏پذیری در ذرت به روش تلاقی‌های دای‌آلل. مجله علوم کشاورزی ایران، 36 (2): 397 - 385.


6. شیر محمد علی، ع. ا. 1367. بررسی ترکیب پذیری لاین‌های ذرت. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، 164 صفحه.


7. طالعی، ع. و نیکخواه کوچکسرایی، ج. 1378. بررسی میزان ترکیب‌پذیری و آثار سیتوپلاسمی به روش دای‌آلل در ذرت، مجله علوم کشاورزی ایران، 3 (4): 769 – 761.


8. عزیزی، ا. 1376. ارزیابی پتانسیل ژنتیکی 8 جامعه آزاد گرده افشان ذرت به روش تلاقی‌های دای‌آلل. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، 105 صفحه.


9. نیکخواه کوچکسرائی، ح. 1373. بررسی میزان ترکیب پذیری صفات سیتوپلاسمی و هتروزیس به روش دای‌آلل در ذرت. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تهران، 78 صفحه.
   
   
   1. Aydin, U., Basal, H. and Konak, C. 2004. Inheritance of Grain Yield in a Half-Diallel Maize Population. Turkish Journal of Agriculture, 28: 239-244.
   
   
   2. Baker, R. J. 1978. Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Science, 18: 533-537.
   
   
   3. Baktash, F. Y., Younis, M. A., Al – Younis, A. H. and Al – Ithawi, B. H. 1980. Diallel crosses of corn inbred lines for grain yield and ear characters. Plant Breeding, 56: 234-239.
   
   
   4. Daurte, B. J. and Pinto, R. M. C. 2002. Biplot AMMI graphic representation of specific combining ability. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 2(2): 161-170.
   
   
   5. Debnath, S. C., Sarker, K. K. and Singh, D. 1989. Combining ability estimates in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agriculture Research, 9(1): 37-42.
   
   
   6. Gardner, C. P. and Eberhart, S. A. 1966. Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related population. Biometrics, 22: 439 – 452.
   
   
   7. Gauch, H. G. 2006. Statistical analysis of regional yield traits: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amweterdam.
   
   
   8. Griffing, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Australian Journal of Biology Science, 9: 463-493.
   
   
   9. Hallauer, A. R. and Eberhart, S. A. 1966. Evaluation of synthetic varieties of maize for yield. Crop Science, 6: 423 – 427.
   
   
   10. Hayman, B. I. 1954. The analysis of variance of diallel crosses. Biometrics, 10: 235-244.
   
   
   11. Lee, T. C. 1984. Test cross and diallel cross analysis of maize. Plant Breeding Abstract, 54: 58.
   
   
   12. Liao, S. S. 1989. Analysis of combining ability for major quantitative character in some maize inbred lines. Maize Abstract, 5 (6) 3556.
   
   
   13. Misevic, D. 1990. Genetic analysis of crosses among maize populations representing different heterotic patterns. Crop Science, 30: 997 – 1001.
   
   
   14. Ortiz, S., Madsen, W. W. And Hill, J. 2001. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction model for a diallel-cross analysis. Theor Apply Genet. 102:1103-1106.
   
   
   15. Rood, S. B., and Major, D.J. 1981. Diallel analysis of the photoperiodic response of maize. Crop Science, 21: 535-541.
   
   
   16. Spaner, D., Brthwait, R. A. I. and Mather, D. E. 1996. Diallel study of open pollinated maize varieties in Trinida. Euphytica, 90: 65-72.
   
   
   17. Stuber, C. W., Moll, R. H. and Hanson, W. D. 1966. Genetic variance and interrelationships of six traits in a hybrid population of Zea mays L. Crop Science, 6: 455-458.
   
   
   18. Zhang, Y., Kang, M. S. and Lamkey, K. R. 2005. DIALLEL – SAS05: A Comprehensive Program for Griffin's and Gardner – Eberhart Analyses. Agronomy Journal, 97: 1097 – 1106.