Incorporating Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE for Clssification of Student Dormitories in Iran

Subject Areas : Statistics

M. Khodabakhshi ¹ , R. Darabi ²

1 - Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, G. C., Tehran, Iran Corresponding author
2 - Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Lorestan University, Khorram Abad, Iran.

Received: 2015-04-14 Accepted : 2015-12-16 Published : 2015-03-21

Keywords: درجه‌بندی خوابگاه‌ها, روش وزنی, فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی, پرامیتی,

Abstract :

In this research a discipline for grading of country’s student dormitory will be designed. Themajor goal of classification is to promote the quality of student dormitories, and results of thisgrading in addition of creating a healthy competitive space between universities forpromotion, will have important consequence of equating the rental money of dormitoriesproportionate with dormitories grade. Also with respect to appendix policies of article 44 ofconstitutional law and 5th program of development sentences, ministry of science, researchand technology shall give welfare services to nongovernmental companies. So existing ofsuch systems for grading of dormitories, will obviously invigorate the supervising dimensionof ministry of science, student welfare fund and universities on given dormitories. Althoughthere are several evaluation methods for universities and centers for higher education, but nomethod for grading of dormitories in international level has been reported up to now.Therefore in this paper, with different beneficiaries corporation, important dimensions andmeasures for grading of dormitories has been determined and with help of designed system,student dormitories are classifying to four classes.

References:

1. Khodabakhshi, Mohammad, 2010, System of gradation of universities departments, Institute for research and planning in higher education

2. Ameri, Reza, 2007, Evaluation and gradation of nongovernmental – non beneficial institutes, Institute for research and planning in higher education

3. Saaty, T.L., 1997. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15 (3), 234- 281

4. Van Laarhoven, P.J.M., Pedryez, W., 1983 “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Set Systems” 11 (3), 229-241

5. Wang, L., Chu, J., Wu, J., 2007, “Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process”. International journal of production economics 107, 151-163.

6. Jean-Marc Martel and Benedetto Matarazzo.”OUTRANKING APPROACHES”