Identification the etiology of root and foot rot’s causal agents of Brassica napus in Marvdasht (Fars province)
Subject Areas : Plant Microbiology
Sara Heydari
1
(Department of Plant Pathology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran)
Fariba Raoufi
2
(Department of Plant Pathology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran.)
Gilda Najafi Pour
3
(Department of Plant Pathology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran)
Keywords: Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Phoma, Pythium,
Abstract :
Background and objective: Canola disease is one of the most important challenges in canola production. In different countries, various fungal agents, such as Rhizoctonia solani Pytium sp., Phytophthora sp. and Fusarium sp. have been introduced as root rot and damping off agents of canola. The aim of this study was to identify the fungal agents involving in canola foot and root rot and, to determine the most frequent fungal agent of the infection in Marvdasht region (Fars province). Materials and methods: In this study, root and foot rotted plants were collected and their fungal agents were isolated. Sampling was performed in various fields in Marvdasht. Isolated fungi were cultured on PDA and purified on 2% water agar. Identification of fungal specious was carried out by using standard keys. All purified isolates were tested for pathogenicity. Results: In this study, five pathogenic fungi belonging to four genera, Fusarium Rhizoctonia Phoma and Pythium were isolated from diseased samples. Among all isolates, F. solani (25%) and Phoma betae (2.5%) had the highest and lowest frequency, respectively. R. solani was very aggressive, whereas P. aphanidermatum and F. solani had produced very mild disease symptom. Conclusion: Our findings showed that canola root rot caused by R. solani is wide dispersed in Marvdasht region in early growth stages; so we strongly recommend that R. solani anastomosis group be identified in the next study. Moreover, usage of anti-microbial resistance and tolerance variety might be investigated. This is the first report of R. solani existence on canola root in Fars province.
1. Li, M.; Murray, G. M. and Ash, G. J. New root diseases of canola in Australia. Aust. Plant Dis. Notes. 2007; 2: 93-94.
2.Khangura, R. Barbetti, M. J and Sweetngham, M. W. Role of Rhizoctonia species in damping off of canola. Proc. 10thIntern. Rapeseed Congr. Canberra. Australia. 1999; 221-234.
3. Gugel, R. K., S. M. Yitbarek, P. R. Verma, R. A. A. Morrall and Sadasiviah, R. S. Etiology of the Rhizoctonia root rot complex of canola in the Peace River region of Alberta. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1987; 9: 119-128.
4. Hwang, S. F., Swanson, T. A and Evans, I. R. Characterization of Rhizoctonia solani isolates from canola in west central Alberta. Plant Dis. 1986; 70: 681-683.
5. Baird, R. E. Hershman, D. E. and Christmas, E. P. Occurrence of Macrophomina phaseolina on Canola in Indiana and Kentucky. Plant Dis. 1994; 73:316.
6. Baird, R. E. First report of Rhizoctonia solani AG4 on canola in Georgia. Plant Dis. 1996; 80: 104.
7. Lange, R and Mclaren,D. A new Fusarium wilt of canola in Alberta. 1th Cana. Phytopathol. Soci. AGM. 2000; 72-83.
8. Gaetan. S. A. Occurrence of Fusarium wilts on canola caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp conglutinans in Argentina. Plant Dis. 2005; 89:432.
9. Gaetan, S. A. Fernandez, L and Madia, M. Occurrence of charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina on canola in Argentina. Plant Dis. 2006; 90:524.
10. Afshari Azad, H. Identification of fungal causal agents on Canola in different regions of Iran and determination of their importance. Plant Protect. J. 3(1), 2002, 53-58.
11. Nosrati,S. Baghbani-Mehmandar, F. and Babaye- Ahari, A. First report of Lasidiodiplodia sp and Chaetomium sp. on Canola in Iran. Proc.15th Protec. Congr., College of Agricul., Kermanshah, Iran, 2002, 113-117.
12. Fasihiani, A. and Firooz, R. Etiology of Canola wilts in Fars province. Proc.17th t Protec. Congr., College of Agricul., Karaj, Iran, 2006, 237-245
13. Sutton, B. C. The Coelomycetes, Fungi Imperfect with Pycnida , Acervuli and Stromata. C. M. I., Kew, Surrey, England, 1980; 696 p.
14. Booth, C. Th Genus Fusarium. Common wealth Mycological Institute. Kew, Surrey, 1971; 273 p.
15. Nelson, P.E.; Toussoun, T. A. Marasas, W.F.O. Fusarium species: an illustrated manual for identification .Pennsylvania state university, University Park and London. 1983;193 pp.
16. Parmeter, J. R. Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology. University of California Press. Berkeley, California, USA. 1970; 255 P.
17. Vander Plaats-Niternk, A. J. Monograph of the Genus Pythium. Studies in Mycology, Centraalbureau Voor Schinmelcultures. Netherlands. 1981; 21:670-692.
18. Cormarc M.W. and Moffatt J. E. Factors influencing storage decay of sugar beet by Phoma and other fungi. Phytopathology, 1961; 51:3-5.
19. Buttner G. P.; Fahler, B.; Marlander, B. Greenhouse and field techniques for testing sugar beet for resistance to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot .Plant Breeding, 2004; 123:158-166.
20. Sneh, B., Burpee, L. L.; Ogoshi, A. Identification of Rhizoctonia Species. The American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul Minnesota. 1991;133 pp.