In silico analysis of pMGA1.2 protein of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in vaccine and pathogenic strains
Insilico analysis for pMGA1.2 protein in Mycoplasma gallisepticum strains
Subject Areas : Bacteriology
Farzaneh Pourkarimi Fatideh
1
,
Majid Esmaelizad
2
,
Mohammad Kargar
3
,
Majid Tebianian
4
,
Farshid Kafilzadeh
5
1 - Department of Microbiology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran.
2 - Research and Development Department, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Alborz, Iran
3 - Department of Microbiology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran
4 - Department of Immunology, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
5 - Department of Microbiology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran
Keywords: pMGA1.2, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, In silico.,
Abstract :
Background & Objectives: Mycoplasma gallisepticum, the pathogen responsible for chronic respiratory disease in chickens, is the most economically important species of Mycoplasma that causing tremendous economic losses worldwide. The most abundant membrane proteins in M. gallisepticum are pMGA, lipoproteins of about 67 kDa. The pMGA family genes have an extraordinary potential for diversifying antigenic structure on the surface of Mycoplasma gallisepticum cells. The aim of this study was to compare the pMGA protein patterns between different strains and hosts of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Material & Methods: All Mycoplasma gallisepticum full genomes available in GenBank till January 2020 were considered and pMGA1.2 sequences were identified, grouped and coded. pMGA1.2 protein with a chain of 650 amino acids between two different hosts (poultry and house finch) was studied by bioinformatics software in all Mycoplasma gallisepticum full genomes. Results: pMGA1.2 gene among different strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum showed five major groups with more than 10 percent divergence. Based on multiple sequence alignment, a specific pattern was identified in house finch isolates. Interestingly, two specific motifs 480DNQNVSNQ487 and 639SSNVSSPSY647 were found in the pMGA1.2 of TS-11 strain, which can probably be used as markers to identify and differentiate this vaccine strain from pathogenic Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Conclusion: This study showed that pMGA1.2 protein have some B-cell epitope antigenic regions that are conserved among all isolates and might be applicable to design serological test for detection antibody against Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
References
Mugunthan S.P, Kannan G, Chandra HM, Paital B. Infection, Transmission, Pathogenesisand Vaccine Development against Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Vaccines. 2023; 11: 469.
Swayne DE, Boulianne M, Logue CM, McDougald LR, Nair V, Suarez DL. Diseases of Poultry. 14th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA.Wiley Blackwell; 2020: Volume 2, 907–923.
Dhondt A. A, Tessaglia D. L , Slothower R. L. Epidemic mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in house finches from eastern North America. Journal of Wildlife Diseases.1998; 34, 265–280.
Ley DH, Berkhoff JE, Levisohn S. Molecular epidemiologic investigations of Mycoplasma gallisepticum conjunctivitis in songbirds by random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses. Emerg Infect Dis.1997; 3:375–380.
Dhondt AA, Tessaglia DL, Slothower RL. Epidemic mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in house finches from eastern North America. Journal of Wildlife Diseases.1998; 34: 265–280.
Dhondt AA, DeCoste JC, Ley DH, Hochachk WM. Diverse wild bird host range of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in eastern North America. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e103553.
Ter Veen C, Dijkman R, De Wit JJ, Gyuranecz M, Feberwee A. Decrease of Mycoplasma gallisepticum seroprevalence and introduction of new genotypes in Dutch commercial poultry during the years 2001-2018. Avian Pathology. 2021; 50: 52-60.
Wanasawaeng Wisanu, Chaichote Supawadee, Chansiripornchai Niwat. Deveolpment of ELISA and serum plate agglutination for detecting antibodies of Mycoplasma gallisepticum using strain of Thai isolate.Thai J Vet Med. 2015;45(4):499-507.
. Hnatow LL, Keeler CL Jr, Tessmer LL, Czymmek K, Dohms JE. Characterization of MGC2 a Mycoplasma gallisepticum cytadhesin with homology to the Mycoplasma pneumoniae 30-kilodalton protein P30 and Mycoplasma genitalium P32. Infect Immun.1998; 66: 3436–3442.
Chen H, Yu S, Shen X, Chen D, Qiu X, Song C, Ding C. The Mycoplasma gallisepticum alpha-enolase is cell surface-exposed and mediates adherence by binding to chicken plasminogen. Microb Pathog .2011; 51:285–290.
Athamna A, Rosengarten R, Levisohn S, Kahane I, Yogev D. Adherence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum involves variable surface membrane proteins. Infect Immun .1997; 65: 2468–2471.
Markham PF, Glew MD, Whithear KG, Walker ID. Molecular cloning of a gene family that encodes pMGA, a hemagglutinin of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Infect Immun.1993; 61: 903–909.
Chambaud I, Wróblewski H, Blanchard A. Interactions between mycoplasma lipoproteins and the host immune system.Trends Microbiol .1999; 7:493–499.
Baseggio N, Glew MD, Markham PF, Whithear KG , Browning GF. Size and genomic location of the pMGA multigene family of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Microbiology.1996; 142: 1429-1435.
. Czifra G, Tuboly T, Sundquist BG, Stipkovits L. Monoclonal antibodies to Mycoplasma gallisepticum membrane proteins. Avian Dis.1993; 37:689–696.
Garcı´a M, Elfaki MG, Kleven SH. Analysis of the variability in expression of Mycoplasma gallisepticum surface antigens. Vet Microbiol.1994; 42:147–158.
Forsyth MH, Tourtelotte ME, Geary SJ. Localization of an immunodominant 64-kDa lipoprotein (LP64) in the membrane of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and its role in cytadherence. Mol Microbiol. 1992; 6: 2099–2106.
Carpenter TE, Mallinson ET, Miller KF, Gentry RF, Schwartz LD. Vaccination with F-strain Mycoplasma gallisepticum to reduce production losses in layer chickens. Avian Dis. 1981; 25:404–409.
Noormohammadi AH, Whithear KG. Comparison of the short-term and long-term efficacies of the Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccines ts-11 and 6/85. Avian Pathology. 2019; 48: 238-244.
. Noormohammadi AH, Markham PF, Duffy MF, Whithear KG, Browning GF. Multigene families encoding the major hemagglutinins in phylogenetically distinct Mycoplasmas. ASM J Infection and Immunity.1998; 66 (7):3470-3475.
Febrwee A, Dewit S, Dijkman R. Clinical expression, epidemiology and monitoring of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae: an update. Avian Pathology. 2021; 1-61.
Bermudez AJ, Kalbac M. Control of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in commercial layers: A field study. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1988; 192:1783.
Glew, MD, Markham PF, Browning GF, Walker ID. Expression studies on four members of the pMGA multigene family in Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Microbiology.1995; 141: 3005–3014.
Baseggio N, Glew MD, Markham PF, Whithear KG, Browning GF. Size and genomic location of the pMGA multigene family of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Microbiology.1996; 142: 1429–1435.
Kay BK, Williamson MP, Sudol M. The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J. 2000; 14:231-241.
Liu L, Payne DM, van Santen VL, Dybvig K, Panangala VS. A protein (M9) associated with monoclonal antibody mediated agglutination of Mycoplasma gallisepticum is a member of the pMGA family. Infect Immun. 1998; 66: 5570-5575.
Markham PF, Glew MD, Brandon MR, Walker ID, Whithear KG. Characterization of a major hemagglutinin protein from Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Infect Immun.1992; 60:3885–3891.
Yasmin F, Ideris A, Omar AR, Bejo MH, Islam R, Wei TS, Giap TC. Molecular characterization of field strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in Malaysia through pMGA and pVPA genes sequencing. Cogent Biology. 2018; 4:1456738
Glew MD, Baseggio N, Markham PF, Browning GF, Walker ID. Expression of the pMGA genes of Mycoplasma gallisepticum is controlled by variation in the GAA trinucleotide repeat lengths within the 5`noncoding regions. Infect Immun.1998; 66: 5833-5841.
Ley DH. Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection. In: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, Mc Dougald LR, Swayne DE . Diseases of poultry. 11 th ed. Lowa State Press, Ames, IA; 2003:722-744.
Javid H. Antigenic properties of Finegoldia magna protein L and Type IV pilin (pilA) for in-silico multi epitope peptide vaccine designing. JMW. 2020; 42(1):78-98[In Persion]
Souod N, Kargar M, Hoseini MH, Jafarinia M. Designing, cloning and expression of ctx-B-tcpA-c-cpe gene in E.coli as a cholera vaccine candidate. JMW. 2021;14(1):6-20[In Persion]
Shahbaaz M, Bisetty K, Ahmad F, Hassan MI. In silico approaches for the identification of virulence candidates amongst hypothetical proteins of Mycoplasma pneumonia. Comput Biol Chem. 2015; 59 Pt A: 67–80.
Gaurivaud P, Baranowski E, Pau-Roblot C, Sagné E, Citti C, Tardy F. Mycoplasma agalactiae Secretion of β-(1→6)-Glucan, a Rare Polysaccharide in Prokaryotes, Is Governed by High-Frequency Phase Variation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016; 82:370–3383.
Mugunthan SP, Chandra HM. A computational reverse vaccinology approach for the design and development of multi-epitopic vaccine against avian pathogen Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:721061.
Mugunthan SP and Chandra HM. In silico structural homology modeling and functional characterization of Mycoplasma gallisepticum variable lipoprotein hemagglutin proteins. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9: 943831.
In silico analysis of pMGA1.2 protein of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in vaccinal and pathogenic strains
1PhD candidate, Department of Microbiology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran. 2Assistant professor, Department of Research and Development, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. 3Professor, Department of Microbiology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran. 4Assistant Professor, Department of Immunology, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Abstract
Background & Objectives: Mycoplasma gallisepticum, the pathogen responsible for chronic respiratory disease in chickens, is the most economically important species of Mycoplasma that causing tremendous economic losses worldwide. The most abundant membrane proteins in M. gallisepticum are pMGA, lipoproteins of about 67 kDa. The pMGA family genes have an extraordinary potential for diversifying antigenic structure on the surface of Mycoplasma gallisepticum cells. The aim of this study was to compare the pMGA protein patterns between different strains and hosts of Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Material & Methods: All Mycoplasma gallisepticum full genomes available in GenBank till January 2020 were considered and pMGA1.2 sequences were identified, grouped and coded. pMGA1.2 protein with 650 length amino acids between two different hosts (poultry and house finch) was studied by bioinformatics software in all Mycoplasma gallisepticum full genomes.
Results: pMGA1.2 gene among different strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum showed five major groups with more than 10 percent divergence. Based on multiple sequence alignment a specific pattern was identified in House Finch isolates. Interestingly, two specific motifs 480DNQNVSNQ487 and 639SSNVSSPSY647 were found in the pMGA1.2 of TS-11 strain, which can probably be used as markers to identify and differentiate this vaccine strain from pathogenic Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Conclusion: In this study was shown that pMGA1.2 protein have some B-cell epitope antigenic regions that are conserved among all isolates and might be applicable to design serological test for detection antibody against Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Keywords: pMGA1.2, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, In silico
Introduction:
Mycoplasma gallisepticum is a main respiratory pathogen of chickens and turkeys causing significant economic damages to the poultry industry (1, 2). Mycoplasma gallisepticum causes respiratory rales, coughing, ocular and nasal discharge, conjunctivitis, reduction in feed intake, lower and uneven growth, decline in egg production, and increase in mortality (3,4). In addition, this infection may be exacerbated by complications with E. coli and other viral pathogens, such as infectious bronchitis virus, rather than a single infection (5)
Mycoplasma gallisepticum first jumped from poultry to house finches in the early 1990s (6). This bacterial pathogen was identified as the reason of conjunctivitis in free-ranging house finches and other songbird species in the eastern United States and Canada in 1994 (7,8). By MLST also identical sequence types were identified in backyard poultry and commercial poultry suggesting the potential spread of Mycoplasma gallisepticum between backyard and commercial poultry (9).
The serum agglutination reaction (SAR) test, hemagglutination inhibition (HI), and ELISA are serology tools recommended for diagnosis of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection (10). Phylogenetic analyses reveal that mycoplasmas have undergone a degenerative evolution from related, low G+C content, the cell-wall-less eubacteria (11,12).It is well documented that Mycoplasma gallisepticum contains cell surface proteins with hemagglutinating (pMGA/VlhA), or adhesive properties like Mgc2, α-enolase or the uncharacterized proteins P30, P48, P50, P80 (13 , 14,15).
Mycoplasma gallisepticum lacks a cell wall and has only a plasma membrane, which contains about 200 proteins as the major membrane protein antigens and immunogens (16,17). pMGA, a surface antigen, has been explained as a lipoprotein from analysis of the gene sequence (18). Lipoproteins are targeted by the immune system (19).Various Mycoplasma gallisepticum strains include 30 to 70 pMGA genes, therefore a large amount of their genome has been specified to encoding several haemagglutinins (20). A large part of the pMGA molecule can be bound by monoclonal antibodies on intact cells, then seems to be placed on the surface of M. gallisepticum bacteria (21). Past report characterized the appearance of size variants of proteins appropriated by monoclonal antibodies in Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccinal F-strain (22). It has been showed that LP64 and pMGA (these two being probably the same protein) are involved in the attachment of Mycoplasma gallisepticum to the poultry respiratory epithelium (23, 24). Three live Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccines were commercially accepted including 6/85 strain, ts-11 and F-strain which have effectively reduced damages related with Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in the field (25, 26).
Attenuated vaccines stimulate immune responses by cellular and humoral immunities . TS-11 and 6/85 were commercially produced using serial passage or chemical mutagenesis while the F-strain vaccine is a naturally-attenuated field isolate. In general, F-strain derived live vaccines induce higher levels of antibodies against M. gallisepticum than ts-11 derived vaccines, whereas 6/85 derived live vaccines often induce low or no detectable serological response during the first months post vaccination (28, 29).
Nine members of the pMGA gene family have been sequenced (pMGA1.1 to pMGA1.9) in M.gallisepticum S6 strain. High level of identity (>95%) was observed in pMGA1.2 and pMGA1.1 genes of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. But other pMGA genes exhibit much lower degrees of sequence identity; however, there are districts of amino acid sequence conserved in various pMGA proteins (30). The aim of this study was in silico analysis of pMGA1.2 protein in order to investigate the potential of pMGA1.2 protein in diagnosis or differentiate vaccinal and pathogenic strains.
Materials and methods
1. Sequence collection: Nucleotide sequence alignment was carried out using BioEdit software and MegAlign. All (18) Mycoplasma gallisepticum full genomes available in GenBank till January 2020 were collected at NCBI website. pMGA1.2 sequences of vaccine strains and field isolates of M.gallisepticum were collected from GenBank databases (https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov) under accession numbers CP028147 (Avipro), CP028146 (F99), CP001873 (Str.F), CP044224 (6/85), CP044225 (ts-11), CP044226 (mx-4), CP006916 (S6), LS991952 (NCTC10115), AE015450 (Rlow) and CP001872 (Rhigh), CP003513, CP003512, CP003511, CP003510, CP003509, CP003508, CP003507 and CP003506 which were released to the public database till Jan 1, 2020.
2. Multiple Alignments, sequences analysis and Phylogenetic Analysis: Multiple sequence alignments using ClustalW method of MegAlign software were performed in order to identify pMGA1.2 sequences. For searching the DNA and protein databases the FASTA and BLAST programs (BLASTN and BLASTP) were used. Nucleotide identity of the pMGA1.2 sequences of Mycoplasma gallisepticum full genomes was determined using the nucleotide BLAST algorithm with GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Nucleotide and protein sequences of pMGA1.2 were compared and percentage of divergence was calculated by MegAlign software. Deletion, insertion, amino acid substitutions in different strains and host groups were evaluated. Phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of nucleotide sequences of pMGA1.2 genes of Mycoplasma gallisepticum strains detected.
3. Epitopes Prediction: Antigenic regions and Linear B-cells epitopes were predicted in different strains of pMGA1.2 protein by online IEDB (Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource) software. http://www.iedb.org/.
Results
1. Multiple Alignment of pMGA1.2 Protein in different strains: Sequences of pMGA1.2 protein were analyzed by MegAlign softwares. The phylogenetic tree of the pMGA1.2 gene among different strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum showed five major groups with more than 10 percent divergence: Group A: include House Finch isolates, and B: include F strains (vaccinal), C: 6.85 strain, D: S6 and R strains, and E: TS-11 strains (Vaccinal) (Fig.1, Table1).
Ten insertion/deletion in amino acid level, 39 single amino acid variation (SAV) and 50 single amino acid polymorphism (SAP) were observed based on multiple alignment of pMGA1.2 protein among different strains.
100% similarity among House Finch isolates was observed. The minimum similarity is related to strain S6 and strain TS-11. The divergence between these two strains is more than 10%.
A repeated 29PTPNPTPN36 sequence was observed in position 28 to 36 of the PMGA1.2 protein. The sequences are divided into two major groups based on this repeated motif. The sequences of house finch and F and S6 strains were repeated twice and in the rest one repetition were observed. In the TS-11 strain, one repeat of a "29PTPNPTPN36" sequence, a T28 amino acid deletion and an N42 insertion were observed. Two specific amino acids I76 and N95 were observed in two strains MX-4 and S6.
Two specific motifs 480DNQNVSNQ487 and 639SSNVSSPSY647 were found only in the sequence of TS-11 strain, which can probably be used as markers to identify this strain. In addition, two other specific amino acid markers such as 499SS500 and S507 were observed in this strain.
A specific pattern was also observed in F strain. Specific amino acids T374, N555, A560, S568, E572, A593, Q596, 600VAN602 and D648 were identified in F strains which can be used as markers to identify F strains. Other specific pattern with eleven amino acids S184, K453, N478, K510, M513, I531, R551, H562, L610, S630, and S641 that identified in House Finch isolates.
Comparison of pMGA1.2 protein sequence of strain S6 with other sequences showed seven specific amino acids K3, S295, V358, K371, D380, R538, E539 and G553 for S6. Three specific amino acids K46, G78 and I399 were found in MX-4 strain.
2. Antigenic region and Epitope prediction: Based on IEDB immunoinformatic databases 21 to 24 epitopes were identified on pMGA1.2 protein (Threshold 1.007, Kolaskar & Tongaonkar method) (table2). Two specific linear B-cell epitopes for MX-4 and S6 strains and four specific epitopes for f strains were observed. The results showed that despite the amino acid differences between the strains, there are the same antigenic parts between the all strains, and this evidence has a good potential in using the structure of pMGA protein in serological tests to identify antibodies against Mycoplasma.
Bioinformatics studies show that this protein is stable (instability index 27) and has resistance to temperature as well as good solubility (hydropathicity -0.408).
Fig 1: A phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of the protein sequences of the pMGA1.2 gene in strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Table 1: Percent of identity and divergene in pMGA protein between different strains.
A higher similarity in the pMGA protein structure is observed between F vaccine and pathogenic strains s6, MX-4 compared to ts-11 vaccine strain (table 1).
Fig 2: Alignment of the amino acid sequences of the pMGA1.2 gene. The amino acid sequences of pMGA1.2, derived from corresponding nucleotide coding sequences (GenBank accession number L28424).
Fig 3: Antigenic regions of pMGA1.2 protein
Table 2: Linear B-cell Epitope predicted in different strains of pMGA1.2
Discussion
Mycoplasma gallisepticum is considered one of the most costly avian diseases to the poultry industry all over the world which is mostly due to egg generation losses (31, 32).
Mycoplasma gallisepticum infections are classified as sporadic by the USDA Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service (2013). Vaccination is propounded the most practicable way of controlling diseases, where depopulation of animals is impracticable, particularly on wide commercial multi-age layer facilities (33).
A multi-gene family in mycoplasmas is that encoding the pMGA cell-surface-exposed lipoproteins. Contrary to the presence of many pMGA genes, all but one either is transcriptionally silent or is transcribed at very low levels within individual field isolates of the organism (34, 35).
Based on previous reports the intergenic regions 5` to the 9.2 and 9.3 ORF contain 15 and 20 copies of the GAA trinucleotide repeats which are characteristic of the intergenic areas of pMGA family members. Variation in the number of GAA repeats is a mechanism of transcriptional regulation for the pMGA genes and 12 GAA repeats are present in the intergenic regions of those pMGA genes that are expressed (36,37).
In the comparison of pMGA gene expression in different Mycoplasma gallisepticum strains received from infected chickens, Berlic et al.(2000) proposed that two kinds of pMGA1.1/ pMGA 1.2 genes could be distinguished in various strains relying the presence or absence of a repeat sequence in the N-terminal proline-rich area. Prolin rich regions of proteins can make elongated structures that may action in protein-protein interactions (38).
In our study, a difference of 18 nucleotides and 6 amino acids length was observed in the pMGA1.2 gene and protein respectively. The presence of repeated sequence 29PTPNPTPN36 in the F vaccine strain and the absence of the 29PTPNPTPN36 repeated sequence in the TS-11, R-High vaccine strains and pathogenic R-Low indicate the lack of correlation between this sequence and bacterial virulence. All the House-finch isolates had two repetitions of the 29PTPNPTPN36 sequence, which indicates that they are all from the same lineage.
In Mycoplasma gallisepticum, the pMGA gene sequences have been reported only for strains S6 and PG31 (39). Moreover, the N-terminal amino acid sequencing of the pMGA has been done for the F and R strains and confirmed a synthesis of proteins similar to the pMGA1.2 .Three different strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, S6, R, and F, expressed single, unique variants of pMGA (40).
Yasmin et al in 2018 indicated the presence of pMGA and pvpA gene sequences and size variations among MG field strains from Malaysia. Their study was on the basis of pMGA and pvpA partial nucleotide sequence (41).
Patterns of pMGA expression and occurrence of antigenically distinct pMGA1.9 protein have been previously investigated only in a highly passaged S6 strain (42,43).
With the worldwide increase in live vaccine usage to control Mycoplasma gallisepticum, techniques that allow differentiation of wild-type (field strain) Mycoplasma gallisepticum from the vaccine strains are important. In addition, strain differentiation techniques maybe used as valuable tools for the control of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, facilitating rapid recognition of outbreaks and epidemiological traceability (44).
In our study, two motifs 480DNQNVSNQ487 and 639SSNVSSPSY647 were found specific for TS-11 vaccine strain. It seems that, the nucleotide sequences of these two markers (1461-1440) and (1941-1887) can be used to design a specific primer to differentiate the TS-11 vaccine strain from other based on PCR technique. In this case, a product of about 480 base pairs will represent the vaccine strain.
More study is needed to evaluate the performance of these two TS-11 specific motifs in DIVA test for differentiation of infected from vaccinated chicken with TS-11.
Live vaccines often showed pathogenicity and adverse side effects, while bacterins have high cost and often repeated doses are required to boost avian immune system. Hence, new novel recombinant vaccines are needed to be developed which are more efficacious and less expensive. More complex vaccines consist of one or more purified antigens, killed pathogens or bacterins with an adjuvant that stimulate the immune response. These vaccines are protective but their utilization is limited due to cost (45).
In silico analysis of vaccine candidate antigens is helpful for design of new generation vaccines. Bioinformatics tools for predicting antigenic properties and candidate vaccines analysis are now a standard approach. Several bioinformatics software and servers are available that can help in the process for planning of chimeric vaccine design (46).
Research on in silico approaches had not yet been reported for Mycoplasma gallisepticum while, some researchers used in silico approaches for the identification of virulence candidates for other mycoplasma species such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae type 2a strain 309 and Mycoplasma agalactiae (47,48). Very few studies are reported in the field of in silico vaccine for poultry and animals (49,50).The following studies validate the immunoinformatics method to design multi-epitopic vaccines against infectious diseases in poultry. The in silico validations like molecular docking and in silico cloning and immune simulation (51,52) were used in indian study to make the constructed multi-epitope as functionally suitable as a vaccine candidate against M. gallisepticum infection(53). In other study, researchers have reported the primary, secondary, and tertiary structural characteristics and subcellular localization, presence of the transmembrane helix and signal peptide, and functional characteristics of vlhA proteins from M. gallisepticum strain R low (54). Thus, future studies are recommended on in silico approaches for the development of effective vaccines. In our study, was shown that pMGA1.2 protein have some B-cell epitope antigenic regions that are conserved among all isolates and might be applicable to design a universal immunogenic antigen as a recombinant vaccine or applicable to designing serological test for detection antibody against Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Conclusion
pMGA1.2 gene showed five groups with more than 10 percent divergence among different strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. In this study was shown that pMGA1.2 protein have some B-cell epitope antigenic regions that are conserved among all isolates and might be applicable to design serological test for detection antibody against Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Interestingly, on the other hand, two specific amino acid sequences 480DNQNVSNQ487 and 639SSNVSSPSY647 were found in the pMGA1.2 protein of TS-11 strain, which can might be used as markers to identify this vaccine strain and differentiate from other.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute of Iran (Karaj) for their support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Noormohammadi AH. Role of phenotypic diversity in pathogenesis of avian mycoplasmosis. Avian Pathol. 2007; 36 :439-44.
2. Mugunthan S.P, Kannan G, Chandra HM, Paital B. Infection, Transmission, Pathogenesis
and Vaccine Development against Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Vaccines. 2023; 11: 469.
3. Raviv Z, Ley DH. Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection. In: Swayne DE, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Nolan LK, Suarez DL, Nair V, Diseases of poultry 13th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press;2013: 877-893.
4. Bradbury JM. Poultry mycoplasmas: sophisticated pathogens in simple guise. Br Poult Sci.
2005; 46:125–136.
5. Swayne DE, Boulianne M, Logue CM, McDougald LR, Nair V, Suarez DL. Diseases of Poultry. 14th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA.Wiley Blackwell; 2020: Volume 2, 907–923.
6. Dhondt A. A, Tessaglia D. L , Slothower R. L. Epidemic mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in house finches from eastern North America. Journal of Wildlife Diseases.1998; 34, 265–280.
7. Ley DH, Berkhoff JE, Levisohn S. Molecular epidemiologic investigations of Mycoplasma gallisepticum conjunctivitis in songbirds by random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses. Emerg Infect Dis.1997; 3:375–380.
8. Dhondt AA, Tessaglia DL, Slothower RL. Epidemic mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in house finches from eastern North America. Journal of Wildlife Diseases.1998; 34: 265–280.
9. Dhondt AA, DeCoste JC, Ley DH, Hochachk WM. Diverse wild bird host range of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in eastern North America. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e103553.
10.Ter Veen C, Dijkman R, De Wit JJ, Gyuranecz M, Feberwee A. Decrease of Mycoplasma gallisepticum seroprevalence and introduction of new genotypes in Dutch commercial poultry during the years 2001-2018. Avian Pathology. 2021; 50: 52-60.
11. Wanasawaeng Wisanu, Chaichote Supawadee, Chansiripornchai Niwat. Deveolpment of ELISA and serum plate agglutination for detecting antibodies of Mycoplasma gallisepticum using strain of Thai isolate.Thai J Vet Med. 2015;45(4):499-507.
12. Woese CR, Maniloff J, Zablen LB. Phylogenetic analysis of the mycoplasmas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A .1980;77: 494-498.
13. Rogers MJ, Simmons j, Walker RT & 8 Other authors. Construction of the mycoplasma evolutionary tree from 5s rRNA sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA .1985; 82: 1160-1164.
14. Hnatow LL, Keeler CL Jr, Tessmer LL, Czymmek K, Dohms JE. Characterization of MGC2 a Mycoplasma gallisepticum cytadhesin with homology to the Mycoplasma pneumoniae 30-kilodalton protein P30 and Mycoplasma genitalium P32. Infect Immun.1998; 66:3436–3442.
15. Chen H, Yu S, Shen X, Chen D, Qiu X, Song C, Ding C. The Mycoplasma gallisepticum alpha-enolase is cell surface-exposed and mediates adherence by binding to chicken plasminogen. Microb Pathog .2011; 51:285–290.
16. Athamna A, Rosengarten R, Levisohn S, Kahane I, Yogev D. Adherence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum involves variable surface membrane proteins. Infect Immun .1997; 65:2468–2471.
17. Razin, S., Yogev, D. and Naot, Y. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev.1998; 62:1094-1156.
18. Jan G, Fontenelle C, Le Hénaff M, Wróblewski H. Acylation and immunological properties of Mycoplasma gallisepticum membrane proteins. Res Microbiol.1995; 146:739–750.
19. Markham PF, Glew MD, Whithear KG, Walker ID. Molecular cloning of a gene family that encodes pMGA, a hemagglutinin of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Infect Immun.1993; 61:903–909.
20. Chambaud I, Wróblewski H, Blanchard A. Interactions between mycoplasma lipoproteins and the host immune system.Trends Microbiol .1999; 7:493–499.
21. Baseggio N, Glew MD, Markham PF, Whithear KG , Browning GF. Size and genomic location of the pMGA multigene family of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Microbiology.1996; 142: 1429-1435.
22. Czifra G, Tuboly T, Sundquist BG, Stipkovits L. Monoclonal antibodies to Mycoplasma gallisepticum membrane proteins. Avian Dis.1993; 37:689–696.
23. Garcı´a M, Elfaki MG, Kleven SH. Analysis of the variability in expression of Mycoplasma gallisepticum surface antigens. Vet Microbiol.1994; 42:147–158.
24.Markham PF, Glew MD, Brandon MR, Walker ID, Whithear KG. Characterization of a major hemagglutinin protein from Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Infect Immun.1992; 60:3885–3891.
25. Forsyth MH, Tourtelotte ME, Geary SJ. Localization of an immunodominant 64-kDa lipoprotein (LP64) in the membrane of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and its role in cytadherence. Mol Microbiol. 1992; 6: 2099–2106.
26. Carpenter TE, Mallinson ET, Miller KF, Gentry RF, Schwartz LD. Vaccination with F-strain Mycoplasma gallisepticum to reduce production losses in layer chickens. Avian Dis. 1981; 25:404–409.
27. Evans RD, Hafez YS, Schreurs CS. Demonstration of the genetic stability of a Mycoplasma gallisepticum strain following in vivo passage. Avian Diseases.1992; 36: 554–560.
28. Whithear KG. Control of Avian mycoplasmoses by vaccination. Rev Sci Tech.1996; 15: 1527-1553.
29. Noormohammadi AH, Whithear KG. (2019). Comparison of the short-term and long-term efficacies of the Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccines ts-11 and 6/85. Avian Pathology. 2019; 48: 238-244.
30. Noormohammadi AH, Markham PF, Duffy MF, Whithear KG, Browning GF. Multigene families encoding the major hemagglutinins in phylogenetically distinct Mycoplasmas. ASM J Infection and Immunity.1998; 66 (7):3470-3475.
31. Levisohn S, Kleven SH. Avian mycoplasmosis (Mycoplasma gallisepticum). Revue Scientifique Technique.2000; 19:425–42.
32. Febrwee A, Dewit S, Dijkman R. Clinical expression, epidemiology and monitoring of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae: an update. Avian Pathology. 2021; 1-61.
33. Bermudez AJ, Kalbac M. Control of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in commercial layers: A field study. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1988; 192:1783.
34. Liu L, Payne DM, Van Santen VL, Dybvig K, Panangala VS. A protein (M9) associated with monoclonal antibody mediated agglutination of Mycoplasma gallisepticum is a member of the pMGA family. Infect Immun. 1998; 66: 5570-5575.
35. Glew, MD, Markham PF, Browning GF, Walker ID. Expression studies on four members of the pMGA multigene family in Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Microbiology.1995; 141:3005–3014.
36. Baseggio N, Glew MD, Markham PF, Whithear KG, Browning GF. Size and genomic location of the pMGA multigene family of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Microbiology.1996; 142: 1429–1435.
37. Markham PF, Glew MD, Sykes JE, Bowden TR., Pollocks TD, Browning GF, Whithear KG, Walker ID. The organization of the multigene family which encodes the major cell surface protein, pMGA, of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. FEBS Lett.1994; 352: 347-352.
38. Kay BK, Williamson MP, Sudol M. The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J. 2000; 14:231-241.
39. Liu L, Payne DM, van Santen VL, Dybvig K, Panangala VS. A protein (M9) associated with monoclonal antibody mediated agglutination of Mycoplasma gallisepticum is a member of the pMGA family. Infect Immun. 1998; 66: 5570-5575.
40. Markham PF, Glew MD, Brandon MR, Walker ID, Whithear KG. Characterization of a major hemagglutinin protein from Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Infect Immun.1992; 60:3885–3891.
41. Yasmin F, Ideris A, Omar AR, Bejo MH, Islam R, Wei TS, Giap TC. Molecular characterization of field strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in Malaysia through pMGA and pVPA genes sequencing. Cogent Biology. 2018; 4:1456738
42. Markham PF, Glew MD, Browning GF, Whithear KG, Walker ID. Expression of two members of the pMGA multigene family of Mycoplasma gallisepticum oscillates and is influenced by the pMGA-specific antibodies. Infect Immun.1998; 66:2845-2853.
43. Glew MD, Baseggio N, Markham PF, Browning GF, Walker ID. Expression of the pMGA genes of Mycoplasma gallisepticum is controlled by variation in the GAA trinucleotide repeat lengths within the 5`noncoding regions. Infect Immun.1998; 66: 5833-5841.
44. Ferguson NM, Hepp D, Sun S, Ikuta N, Levisohn S, Kleven SH, Garcia M. Use of molecular diversity of Mycoplasma gallisepticum by gene-targeted sequencing (GTS) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis for epidemiological studies. Microbiol. 2005; 151:1883–1893.
45. Ley DH. Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection. In: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, Mc Dougald LR, Swayne DE . Diseases of poultry. 11 th ed. Lowa State Press, Ames, IA; 2003:722-744.
46. Koraka P, Martina BE, Osterhaus AD. Bioinformatics in new generation flavivirus vaccines. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010; 864029.
47. Shahbaaz M, Bisetty K, Ahmad F, Hassan MI. In silico approaches for the identification of virulence candidates amongst hypothetical proteins of Mycoplasma pneumonia. Comput Biol Chem. 2015; 59 Pt A: 67–80.
48. Gaurivaud P, Baranowski E, Pau-Roblot C, Sagné E, Citti C, Tardy F. Mycoplasma agalactiae Secretion of β-(1→6)-Glucan, a Rare Polysaccharide in Prokaryotes, Is Governed by High-Frequency Phase Variation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016; 82:370–3383.
49. Osman MM, ElAmin EE, Al-Nour MY, Alam SS, Adam RS, Ahmed AA, et al. In silico design of epitope based peptide vaccine against virulent strains of (HN)-Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) in poultry species. Int J ultidiscip Cur Res. 2016; 868–78.
50. Unni PA, Ali AMMT, Rout M, Thabitha A, Vino S, Lulu SS. Designing of an epitope-based peptide vaccine against walking pneumonia: an immunoinformatics approach. Mol Biol Rep. 2019; 46:511–27.
51. Behbahani M, Moradi M, Mohabatkar H. In silico design of a multiepitope peptide construct as a potential Vaccine candidate for Influenza A based on neuraminidase protein. In Silico Pharmacol. 2021; 9:36.
52. Hossain MS, Hossan MI, Mizan S, Moin AT, Yasmin F, Akash A, et al. Immunoinformatics approach to designing a multiepitope vaccine against Saint Louis Encephalitis Virus. Informatics Med Unlocked. 2021; 22:100500.
53. Mugunthan SP, Chandra HM. A computational reverse vaccinology approach for the design and development of multi-epitopic vaccine against avian pathogen Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:721061.
54. Mugunthan SP and Chandra HM. In silico structural homology modeling and functional characterization of Mycoplasma gallisepticum variable lipoprotein hemagglutin proteins. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9: 943831.