Isolation, screening and efficiency of Pseudomonas isolates in biofilm formation on organic and inorganic carriers and phenanthrene bioremediation

Subject Areas : Microbial Biotechnology

maryam  Tarkashvand ¹ (Soil Science Department, Agricultural College, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran)
Amir  Lakzian ² (Soil Science Department, Agricultural College Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Mashhad, Iran)
Amir  Fotovat ³ (Soil Science Department, Agricultural college, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran)
Mehdi  Mohammady ⁴ (Biotechnology Department,, Persian Gulf Research Institute,Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran)

Received: 2020-04-12 Accepted : 2020-06-15 Published : 2020-05-21

Keywords: Biofilm, Biochar, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Phenanthrene, Laccase,

Abstract :

Background & Objectives: Microbial biofilms are one of the most important microorganism’s forms of life in the environment. The aim of this study was to use native Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilm form to clean up phenanthrene. Material & Methods: Among 63 Pseudomonas isolates from Iranian soil, bacterial isolate with high potency in biofilm formation and crude oil degradation was selected and genetically identified. The effect of inorganic (raw pumice, processed pumice and perlite) and organic (biochar and sugarcanes bagasse) carriers on biofilm formation was investigated. Biofilm structure was studied by scanning electron microscopy. Also, the effects of two growth form (biofilm, planktonic) on biochar carrier on laccase production and phenanthrene degradation in liquid media was investigated. Results: Purified Pseudomonas isolates were screened based on biofilm formation and crude oil degradation. B59 (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) with 56.62% showed the highest percentage of crude oil degradation. Highest and lowest CFU belonged to biochar and processed pumice with 8.8 and 2.9 respectively. Laccase activity was measured in biofilm form and planktonic form 39.8 and 33.1 Um-1 respectively. Biofilm form of Pseudomonas aeruginosa led to 97.17% phenanthrene degradation where planktonic form reached 91.37%. Conclusion: Results showed that biofilm form of Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared to planktonic form by significant increase in CFU and laccase activity result in more phenanthrene degradation in liquid media.

References:

1. Lynch AS, Robertson GT. Bacterial and fungal biofilm infections. Annu. Rev. Med.. 2008; 18:
   59:415-28.
   2. El-Azizi MA, Starks SE, hardori N. Interactions of Candida albicans with other Candida spp.
   and bacteria in the biofilms. Journal of applied microbiology. 2004; 96(5):1067-73.
   3. Shakibaie MR. Bacterial biofilm and its clinical implications. Annals of Microbiology and
   Research. 2018; 2: 2(1).
   4. Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, jelleberg S. Biofilms: an
   emergent form of bacterial life. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2016;14(9): 563.
   5. arn S , Duan J, Jenkinson IR. Book review: Role of biofilms in bioremediation. Frontiers in
   Environmental Science. 2017; 15: 5:22.
   6. Ramos JL, Marqués S, van Dillewijn P, Espinosa-Urgel M, Segura A, Duque E, rell T,
   Ramos-González MI, Bursakov S, Roca A, Solano J. Laboratory research aimed at closing the
   gaps in microbial bioremediation. Trends in biotechnology. 2011; 29(12): 641-7.
   7. Chorom M, Hosseini SS. Bioremediation of Crude Oil-Polluted Soil by Sewage Sludge
   (Symposium 3.5. 2 Risk Assessment and Risk Based Remediation, < Special Issue>
   International Symposium: Soil Degradation Control, Remediation, and Reclamation, Tokyo
   Metropolitan University Symposium Series No. 2, 2010). Pedologist. 2011; 54(3): 294-301.
   8. ebria DY, hodadadi A, Ganjidoust H, Badkoubi A, Amoozegar MA. Isolation and
   characterization of a novel native Bacillus strain capable of degrading diesel fuel. International
   Journal of Environmental Science & Technology. 2009; 6(3):435-42.
   9. Demeter MA, Lemire J, Yue G, Ceri H, Turner RJ. Culturing oil sands microbes as mixed
   species communities enhances ex situ model naphthenic acid degradation. Frontiers in
   microbiology. 2015; 4(6):936.
   10. Tremaroli , acchi Suzzi C, Fedi S, Ceri H, annoni D, Turner RJ. Tolerance of
   Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes F707 to metals, polychlorobiphenyls and chlorobenzoates:
   effects on chemotaxis-, biofilm-and planktonic-grown cells. FEMS microbiology ecology.
   2010;74(2): 291-301.
   11. hang Y, Wang F, hu X, eng J, hao , Jiang X. Extracellular polymeric substances
   govern the development of biofilm and mass transfer of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for
   improved biodegradation. Bioresource technology. 2015; 193: 274-80.
   12. hoei NS, Andreolli M, Lampis S, allini G, Turner RJ. A comparison of the response of two
   Burkholderia fungorum strains grown as planktonic cells versus biofilm to dibenzothiophene
   and select polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Canadian journal of microbiology. 2016; 62(10):
   851-60.
   13. Halan B, Schmid A, Buehler . Real-time solvent tolerance analysis of Pseudomonas sp.
   strain LB120ΔC catalytic biofilms. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 2011; 77(5): 1563
   -1571.
   14. ingaro A, Nicolaou SA, Papoutsakis ET. Dissecting the assays to assess microbial
   tolerance to toxic chemicals in bioprocessing. Trends in biotechnology. 2013; 31(11): 643-53.
   15. Mandal A , Sarma PM, Singh B, Jeyaseelan CP, Channashettar A, Lal B, Datta J.
   Bioremediation: an environment friendly sustainable biotechnological solution for remediation
   of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated waste. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology.
   2012; 2(8): 1-2.
   16. Seo JS, eum YS, Li X. Bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds. International journal
   of environmental research and public health. 2009 Jan;6(1):278-309.
   17. O Toole GA. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. Journal of isualized Experiments,
   2011; 30(47):e2437.
   18. Rahman S, Thahira-Rahman J, Lakshmanaperumalsamy P, Banat IM. Towards efficient
   crude oil degradation by a mixed bacterial consortium. Bioresource technology. 2002; 85(3):
   257-261.
   19. Marmur J. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from micro-organisms.
   Journal of molecular biology. 1961; 3(2):208-IN1.
   20. Nie M, Nie H, He M, Lin Y, Wang L, Jin P, hang S. Immobilization of biofilms of
   Pseudomonas aeruginosa NY3 and their application in the removal of hydrocarbons from
   highly concentrated oil-containing wastewater on the laboratory scale. Journal of
   environmental management. 2016;173: 34-40.
   21. Weber , Delben J, Bromage TG, Duarte S. Comparison of SEM and PSEM imaging
   techniques with respect to Streptococcus mutans biofilm topography. FEMS microbiology
   letters. 2014; 350(2): 175-179.
   22. im E , Ahn IS, LW L, ML S. Enhanced In-situ Mobilization and Biodegradation of
   Phenanthrens from Soil by a Solvent/Surfactant System. Journal of microbiology and
   biotechnology. 2001; 11(4): 716-719.
   23. Moody JD, Freeman JP, Doerge DR, Cerniglia CE. Degradation of phenanthrene and
   anthracene by cell suspensions of Mycobacterium sp. strain PYR-1. Applied Environmental
   Microbiology, 2001; 67(4): 1476-83.
   24. ahng H, Nam . Molecular characteristics of Pseudomonas rhodesiae strain 1 in
   response to phenanthrene. 2002.
   25. Xiong , Pang , Wang B, Ji X, Liu Y, Yang G, Dong C, Chen J, Lucia L. Biomechanical
   Pulping of Poplar with Crude Enzyme Secreted from Trametes sp. lg-9. BioResources. 2018;
   13(2): 3420-8.
   26. Nelson P. Index to EPA test methods. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region I; 2003.
   27. Wasi S, Tabrez S, Ahmad M. Use of Pseudomonas spp. for the bioremediation of
   environmental pollutants: a review. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2013; 185(10):
   8147-55.
   28. De ievit TR. uorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Environmental
   microbiology. 2009; 11(2): 279-88.
   29. Ha DG, O Toole GA. c‐di‐GMP and its effects on biofilm formation and dispersion: a
   Pseudomonas aeruginosa review. Microbial Biofilms. 2015; 7: 301-317.
   30. Høiby N, Ciofu O, Bjarnsholt T. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in cystic fibrosis. Future
   microbiology. 2010; 5(11): 1663-1674.
   31. Bjarnsholt T. The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections. Apmis. 2013; 121:1-58.
   32. Rasamiravaka T, Labtani , Duez P, El Jaziri M. The formation of biofilms by Pseudomonas
   aeruginosa: a review of the natural and synthetic compounds interfering with control
   mechanisms. BioMed research international. 2015.
   33. Emtiazi G, Shakarami H, Nahvi I, Mirdamadian SH. Utilization of petroleum hydrocarbons by
   Pseudomonas sp. and transformed E. coli. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2005 ;4(2):172-6.
   34. Pazarlioğlu N , Telefoncu A. Biodegradation of phenol by Pseudomonas putida immobilized
   on activated pumice particles. Process Biochemistry. 2005; 40(5):1807-14.
   35. Radhakrishnan M , Sugumaran E. Efficacy of sugarcane bagasse to produce bacterial biofilm
   in water for fish culture. Journal of Ecobiotechnology. 2010.
   36. Frankel ML, Bhuiyan TI, eksha A, Demeter MA, Layzell DB, Helleur RJ, Hill JM, Turner
   RJ. Removal and biodegradation of naphthenic acids by biochar and attached environmental
   biofilms in the presence of co-contaminating metals. Bioresource technology. 2016; 216:
   352-361.
   37. Accinelli C, Saccà ML, Mencarelli M, icari A. Application of bioplastic moving bed biofilm
   carriers for the removal of synthetic pollutants from wastewater. Bioresource technology. 2012;
   120:180-186.
   38. Sun D, Hale L, Crowley D. Nutrient supplementation of pinewood biochar for use as a
   bacterial inoculum carrier. Biology and fertility of soils. 2016; 52(4): 515-522.
   39. Ming J, Wang , Yoza BA, Liang J, Guo H, Li J, Guo S, Chen C. Bioreactor performance
   using biochar and its effect on aerobic granulation. Bioresource Technology. 2020; 300:
   122620.
   40. Sun D, Hale L, Crowley D. Nutrient supplementation of pinewood biochar for use as a
   bacterial inoculum carrier. Biology and fertility of soils. 2016; 52(4): 515-522.
   41. Horemans B, Albers P, Springael D. The biofilm concept from a bioremediation
   perspective.2015; 23-40
   42. Demeter MA, Lemire JA, Turner RJ, Harrison JJ. Biofilm Survival Strategies in Polluted
   Environments. Biofilms in Bioremediation: Current Research and Emerging Technologies.
   2016; 15: 43-56.
   43. Chandra R, Chowdhary P. Properties of bacterial laccases and their application in
   bioremediation of industrial wastes. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2015; 17(2):
   326-42.
   44. Arunkumar T, Alex Anand D, Narendrakumar G. Production and partial purification of laccase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa ADN04. Journal of Pure & Applied Microbiology. 2014; 8
   (2): 727-731.
   45. Strong PJ, Claus H. Laccase: a review of its past and its future in bioremediation. Critical
   Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2011; 41(4): 373-434.
   46. Han MJ, Choi HT, Song HG. Degradation of phenanthrene by Trametes versicolor and its
   laccase. The Journal of Microbiology. 2004; 42(2): 94-8.
   47. Di Lorenzo A, arcamonti M, Parascandola P, ignola R, Bernardi A, Sacceddu P, Sisto R, de
   Alteriis E. Characterization and performance of a toluene-degrading biofilm developed on
   pumice stones. Microbial Cell Factories. 2005; 4(1):4.
   48. Liu J, Chen S, Ding J, Xiao Y, Han H, hong G. Sugarcane bagasse as support for
   immobilization of Bacillus pumilus H -2 and its use in bioremediation of
   mesotrione-contaminated soils. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2015; 99(24):
   10839-51.
   49. hang H, Tang J, Wang L, Liu J, Gurav RG, Sun . A novel bioremediation strategy for
   petroleum hydrocarbon pollutants using salt tolerant Corynebacterium variabile HRJ4 and
   biochar. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2016; 47:7-13.
   50. Lerch T , Chenu C, Dignac MF, Barriuso E, Mariotti A. Biofilm vs. Planktonic Lifestyle:
   consequences for Pesticide 2, 4-D metabolism by Cupriavidus necator JMP134. Frontiers in
   microbiology. 2017; 23: 8:904.
   51. Johnsen AR, Wick LY, Harms H. Principles of microbial PAH-degradation in soil.
   Environmental pollution. 2005; 133(1): 71-84.
   52. Decho AW. Microbial biofilms in intertidal systems: an overview. Continental shelf research.
   2000; 20(10-11): 1257-73.