Studying of Governance Evolution Theories in the Higher Education System and Universities to improve productivity

Subject Areas :

Yahya Dadash Karimi ¹ , naser mirsepasi ² , Reza Najaf Beigi ³

1 - Graduate in Public Administration - Human Resources, Department of governmental management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran
2 -
3 - Associate Professor, Department of governmental management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2018-08-23 Accepted : 2019-02-20 Published : 2019-03-19

Keywords: higher education, good governance, Higher education governance,

Abstract :

The main purpose of the present research is to explain the factors affecting the transparency, accountability and participation of higher education governance. It can be said that according to the nature of the present research , this research has been based on the purpose of the fundamental type and has been categorized according to the method of exploration (of a qualitative type) . In this research, the sampling method (to achieve theoretical saturation) has been used in the sampling process. The statistical population of the study consisted of two groups of academic directors and professors interviewed by open interview. In this research , considering that the purpose of the study was to provide a model for governance in higher education , some quality analysis methods such as theme analysis were used to analyze the interviews (coding and determining the main and minor themes). Therefore, in this study, by combining the results obtained in each interview and comparing and comparing the results with each other, the analysis was performed within each of the study subjects. At this stage, the themes expressed in various interviews and as a result of saturation were identified as the results of the study on the studies considered. The final output of the mentioned steps is a table of main themes and, ultimately, the final model of research consists of nine main factors: political political transparency, economic transparency, administrative transparency (bureaucratic), social political accountability, economic accountability, administrative accountability (Bureaucratic), social political participation, economic participation, administrative participation (bureaucratic).

References:

الوانی، س. م.، مردانی، م. ر. (1391). طراحی الگوی توسعه آموزش عالی ایران در افق چشم‌انداز 20 ساله کشور.

الوانی، ‌س. م.، علیزاده ‌ثانی، م. (1386). تحلیلی بر کیفیت حکمرانی خوب در ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت، 53.

افخمی روحانی، ح.، رحمان سرشت، ح.، مرجانی، ش. (1393). حکمرانی دانشگاهی و ارزیابی پرتال و وب گاه‌ها، نشریه نامه آموزش عالی، صص 75-96.

فتح الهی، ا.، و دیگران. (1393). تحلیل محتوایی برنامه‌های پنج‌گانه توسعه ایران با توجه به مقوله‌های الگوهای حکمرانی آموزش عالی، آموزش عالی ایران، شماره4، صص 47-82.

فقیهی، ا.، دانایی فرد، ح. (1387). بوروکراسی و توسعه در ایران، تهران، انتشارات رسا.

قورچیان، ن.، احمدی رضایی، ح. (1393). حکمرانی دانشگاه‌های تراز جهانی؛ ضرورت یا نیاز، فصلنامه آینده‌پژوهی مدیریت، سال بیست و پنجم، شماره 100، صص 23-34

مینتزبرگ، ه. (1377). سازماندهی، پنج الگوی کارساز، ناشر: مرکز آموزش مدیریت دولتی ریاست.

نقیبی مفرد، ح. (1389). حکمرانیمطلوبدرپرتو جهانی‌شدنحقوقبشر، موسسه مطالعات پژوهش‌های حقوقی شهر دانش.

یگانگی، س. ع.، الوانی، س. م.، معمارزاده، غ. ر. (1395). اولویت‌بندی حکمرانی خوب در سازمان‌های کارا، فصلنامه رسالت مدیریت دولتی، سال هفتم، شماره بیست و یکم.

McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for “good” governance?. Geoforum, 43 (1), 81-94.

Gisselquist, R. (2012). Good Governance as a Conceptand why This Matters for Development Policy, World Institute for Development Economics Research, Working paper, No. 2012/30

Lockwood, M. (2010). Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of environmental management, 91 (3), 754-766.

Marginson, S. (2013). Different Roads To A Shared Goal: Political and Cultural Variation in World-class Universities.

Klomp, J., and De Hann, J. (2015). Effect of Governance on Health: A Cross Sectional Analysis of 101 Countries, KYKLOS, 61 (4), pp. 599-614

Jongbloed, B. (2003). Marketization in higher education, Clark’s triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, 57 (2), 110–135

Van Vught, F. (1989). Governmental strategies and innovation in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley

De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85 (1), 27–46.

Rotberg, R. I. (2014). Good governance means performance and results. Governance, 27 (3), 511-518.

Teodorescu, D. (2006). Institutional Researchers as Knowledge Managers in Universities: Envisioning New Roles for the IR Profession. Tertiary Education and Management, 12 (1): 75-88. doi: 10. 1007/s11233-005-4069-0.

Deborah, B., & Monica, K. (2009). Knowledge management and effective university governance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13 (6): 547.

Kaiser, F. (2007). Higher education in France: Country report, CHEPS—Twente. Kru ̈cken, G., Kosmu ̈tzky, A., & Torka, M. (2007). Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 108–131). Bielefeld: Transcript

Dobbins, M. (2011). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence towards a common model? Basingstoke: Palgrave (forthcoming).

Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2009). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence towards a common model? Governance, 22 (3), 397–430

Nybom, T. (2003). The Humboldt legacy: Reflections on the past, present and future of the European university. Higher Education Policy, 16, 141–159.

Olsen, J. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European University. In M. Peter & O. Johan (Eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.

De Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2003). New rules of the game? Reflections on governance, management and system change. In J. File & L. Goedegebuure, (Eds. ). Real-time systems. Reflections on higher education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia (pp. 207-234). Center for Higher Education Policy Studies: University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands & Vutium, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.

Niemann, D. (2010). Turn of the tide—New horizons in German education policymaking through IO influence. In K. Martens, N. Alexander-Kenneth, W. Michael, & W. Ansgar (Eds. ), Transformation of education policy—The impact of the bologna process and the PISA study in comparative perspective (pp. 77–104). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier Science

Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (2004). The Balanced Score-card –Translating Strategy into Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Ferlie, E., McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P. (Eds.). (2002). New public management: Current trends and future prospects. Psychology Press.

Fry, M. J. (1997). In favour of financial liberalisation. The economic journal, 107 (442), 754-770.

Paul, M. N., & Larry, S. (2005). Group Knowledge and Group Knowledge Processes in School Board Decision Making. Canadian Journal of Education, 28 (3): 434.

Burns, A. (2007). Corporate Governance: Model Statements for Inclusion in Annual Reports. Annex J.

Jonge, J. D. (Ed. ) (2011). 12 Manage. Bilthoven UT, Netherlands.

ECB. (2004). European Central Bank, Annual Report 2004, Glossary. Frankfurt.

Naidoo, M. B. L. L. B. (2011). Corporate Governance-fairness, accountability and transparency. Accountancy SA, 37.

Kennedy, K. (2003). Higher Education Governance as a Key Policy Issue in the 21st Century. Educational Research for Policy & Practice, 2 (1): 55

Trakman, L. (2008). Modelling University Governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62 (1-2): 63-83. [doi: 10. 1111/j. 1468-2273. 2008. 00384. x].

Pitlik, H., Frank, B., & Firchow, M. (2010). The demand for transparency: An empirical note. The Review of International Organizations, 5 (2): 177-195. [doi: 10. 1007/s11558-009-9073-6].

Carnegie, G. D., & Tuck, J. (2010). Understanding the ABC of university governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69 (4), 431-441

Chandra, D. S., and Yokoyama, K. (2016). The Role of good governance in the knowledge-based economic growth of East Asia ‒ A study on Japan, Newly Industrialized Economies, Malaysia and China, Social system research, No. 22,

Dobbins, M. (2011). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence towards a common model? Basingstoke: Palgrave (forthcoming).

Drechsler, R. (Ed.). (2004). Advanced formal verification (Vol. 122). Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Webster-Stratton, C., Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., & Newcomer, L. L. (2011). The Incredible Years teacher classroom management training: The methods and principles that support fidelity of training delivery. Online submission, 40 (4), 509-529.

Caiden, G. E. (2002). Enron, accountancy, and professional ethics. Public Integrity, 4 (4), 321-332