Intuitive Fuzzy Assessment (IFSs) Violation of Auditors' Professional Skepticism under Pressures Based on Social Conformity

Subject Areas : Management Accounting

Bahram Shirzad ¹ , Hashem Nikoomaram ² , hamidreza vakilifard ³ , bahman bani mahd ⁴

1 - PhD Student, Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Professor of Accounting Department of Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran,Iran.
3 - دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 - دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

Received: 2022-01-16 Accepted : 2022-01-16 Published : 2021-11-22

Keywords: Intuitive Fuzzy Assessment (IF, Violation of Auditors' Profess, Pressures Based on Social Conf,

Abstract :

Professional skepticism is based on the argument in the auditing profession that it can give professional auditing judgments a more inclusive form of transparency to stakeholders. However, due to the structural complexities of the market system, the professional functions of auditors, under the influence of pressures, can usually reduce the quality of the audit report while reducing the professional skepticism of auditors. Social compliance pressures are seen as one of the functions of violating professional skepticism that alienates auditors from their professional nature. The purpose of this research is Intuitive Fuzzy Assessment (IFSs) Violation of Auditors' Professional Skepticism under Pressures Based on Social Conformity. In terms of purpose, this study is part of developmental research, because due to the lack of basis for the existence of social compliance pressures and professional skepticism in previous research, based on meta-analysis in the first step was tried to identify components as the analytical basis of research and propositions as reference variables. Then, in order to explain the identified components and propositions in the text of the audit profession, in a small part, intuitive fuzzy evaluation analysis (IFSs) was used to determine the most effective pressure due to social compliance in violation of auditors' mindfulness propositions. In this study, the target population consisted of two parts: qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative part, with the help of 15 accounting experts at the university level, an attempt was made to identify the research components, components and propositions in the form of scoring forms. In the quantitative part, 20 audit partners with more than 3 years of work experience were used to participate in the research. The results showed that market pressure is the most effective factor in violation of auditors' professional skepticism. In fact, the result of this study reflects the fact that the existence of pressures due to imbalance in the distribution of market share, which in this study was referred to as the market pressure component, has the greatest incentive to violate the professional skepticism of auditors.

References:

• حساس‌یگانه، یحیی.، عموزاد، شهرام. (1399). عوامل موثر بر قضاوت‌ حرفه‌ای(اخلاقی) حسابرسان و فشارهای وارده برآن‌‌ها، مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 17(67): 1-26


• حسینی، سیدحسین.، بنی‌مهد، بهمن.، صفری، زهرا. (1399). بررسی تأثیر دیدگاه‌های تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرس بر ارزیابی ریسک تقلب، باتوجه به اثر مداخله‌کنندگی مهارت ارتباطی و تضعیف اجتماعی، دانش حسابداری، 11(2): 71-105.


• صادقی‌فسایی، سهیلا.، امینیان، احسان. (1395). از هنجارگرایی تا هنجارگریزی: سنخ‌شناسی همنوایی اجتماعی و تحلیل‌کیفی شرایط علّی موثر بر آن، بررسی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، 7(2): 77-104


• محمودی‌نسب، زینب.، بنی‌مهد، بهمن.، اوحدی، فریدون. (1396). مطالعه تقابل اجتماعی در حرفه حسابرسی: آزمون نظریه انصاف، دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 6(21): 157-168.


• مهرانی، ساسان.، حساس‌یگانه، یحیی.، ابویی‌اردکان، محمد.، گنجی، حمیدرضا. (۱۳۹۸). طراحی مدل تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسی مبتنی بر نظریه مبنایی، دانش حسابرسی، ۱۹(۷۶): ۵-۳۸


• واسعی‌چهارمحالی، مهدی.، ولیان، حسن.، عبدلی، محمدرضا.، صفری‌گرایلی، مهدی. (1397). بررسی تأثیر فشار روانی ‌شغلی حسابرسان بر کیفیت حسابرسی با تأکید بر نقش تعدیل‌کنندگی اولین حسابرسی برای مشتریان جدید، حسابداری سلامت، 7(2): 82-103.


• ولیان، حسن.، صفری‌گرایلی، مهدی.، حسن‌پور، داوود. (۱۳۹۹). هویت حرفه‌ای و سازمانی حسابرسان و تجاری‌سازی در مؤسسات حسابرسی، دانش حسابرسی، ۲۰(۷۸): ۳۵۶-۳۹۱.


• Ali, A., Abazi, D. (2018). Conformity pressure and auditors’ judgement: How peers affect one another in audit firms in Sweden? Master Thesis in Business Administration specializing in Auditing and controlling, 15 credits.


• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (2007). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. AU Section 316. New York, NY: AICPA.


• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99. New York, NY: AICPA.


• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2006). Understanding the entity and its environment and assessing the risks of material misstatement. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 109. New York, NY: AICPA.


• Asbahr, K., Klaus, A. (2017). Real Effects of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Auditors' Judgment of Accounting Estimates (March 3). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3069755 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3069755


• Auditing Practices Board. (2011). Auditor Scepticism: Raising the Bar. Feedback Paper. London, UK: Financial Reporting Council.


• Bentley, J, W., Lambert, T, A., Wang, E, Y. (2020). The Effect of Increased Audit Disclosure on Managers' Real Operating Decisions: Evidence from Disclosing Critical Audit Matters, The Accounting Review, https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0486


• Brazel, J, F., Gimbar, Ch., Maksymov, E., Schaefer, T, R. (2018). The Outcome Effect and Professional Skepticism: A Replication and an Attempt at Mitigation (March). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3140647or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140647


• Brink, A, G., Tang, F., Yang, L. (2016). The Impact of Estimate Source and Social Pressure on Auditors' Fair Value Estimate Choices. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(2): 29-40. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51457


• Clayton, B. M., & Van Staden, C. J. (2015). The impact of social influence pressure on the ethical decision making of professional accountants: Australian and New Zealand evidence: Social influence pressure and ethical decision making. Australian Accounting Review, 25(4), 372-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12077


• Cohen, J. , Dalton, D, W., Harp, N, L. (2017).  Neutral and presumptive doubt perspectives of professional skepticism and auditor job outcomes, Accounting, Organizations and Society, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.003


• European Commission. (2010). Green Paper on Audit Policy: Lessons from the Crisis. Brussels: EC.


• Financial Services Authority and Financial Reporting Council. (2010). Enhancing the auditor’s contribution to prudential regulation. London: United Kingdom


• Frank, M, L. (2020). When do Auditors' Professional Values Constrain the Biasing Effects of Self Interest? An Experimental Investigation, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 32(2): 41-55. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-19-068


• Freitas, A. L., Salovey, P., & Liberman, N. (2001). Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3): 410-433.


• Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Practitioner summary: Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), 1–10


• Gollwitzer, P. M. and U. Bayer. (1999). Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, edited by S. Chaiken and Y. Trope. New York: Guilford Press. 403- 422


• Griffith, E, E., Kadous, K., Young, D. (2020). Improving Complex Audit Judgments: A Framework and Evidence, Contemporary Accounting Research, https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12658


• Heckhausen, H. (1986). Why some time out might benefit achievement motivation research. In Achievement and Task Motivation, edited by J. H. L. van den Bercken, T. C. M. Bergen, and E. E. J. De Bruyn. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. 739


• Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 29(1): 149- 171.


• Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45–97.


• McAllister, M., Blay, A, D., Kadous, K. (2021). Fraud Brainstorming Group Composition in Auditing: The Persuasive Power of a Skeptical Minority, The Accounting Review, 96(3): 431-448. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2018-0027


• Nasution, D. and Östermark, R. (2012). The impact of social pressures, locus of control, and professional commitment on auditors’ judgment: Indonesian evidence, Asian Review of Accounting, 20(2): 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341211242204


• Nolder, Ch, J., Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward, Accounting, Organizations and Society 67; 1–14.


• Olsen, C., Gold, A. (2018). Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism, Journal of Accounting Literature, 41(2): 127-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006


• Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alon: America Declining Social Capital, Journal of Democracy, 6(1): 65-78.


• Ranzilla, S., Chevalier, R. E., Herrmann, G., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2011). Elevating professional judgment. In S. Ranzilla, R. E. Chevalier, G. Herrmann, S. M. Glover, & D. F. Prawitt (Eds.). Auditing: The KPMG professional judgment framework. New York, NY: KPMG LLP


• Toba, Y. (2011). Toward a Conceptual Framework of Professional Skepticism in Auditing. Waseda Business & Economic Studies, 47(1): 110- 124


• Verwey, I, G, F., Asare, S, K. (2021). The Joint Effect of Ethical Idealism and Trait Skepticism on Auditors’ Fraud Detection, Journal of Business Ethical, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04718-8


• Xu, Y., Wang, H., Merigo, J, M. (2012). Intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein Choquet integral operators for multiple attribute decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(2): 227-253. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.913273


• Yu, D. (2013). Intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application in multi-criteria group decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.762951