Application of the Light TDABC model to select the most profitable products (Case study: Hamvatan dairy products company)

Subject Areas : Management Accounting

Mehran Javadpour ¹ (Department of Accounting, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.)
Mohsen Hamidian ² (Department of Accounting, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2018-06-17 Accepted : 2018-09-11 Published : 2019-06-22

Keywords: Rule 20-80, Pareto principle, Time Driving Activity-Based Co, Light Time Driving Activity-Ba,

Abstract :

The revolution that generated the first and second generations of activity-based costing models, ABC and TDABC, in calculating the cost of finished goods, has made it a great help for decision makers. The traditional cost models, because of the lack of attention to the causal relationship between indirect costs and its causative factor, cause a lake of proper allocation of these costs to products, based on the activity-based costing models, by causally causing the causal relationship between the costs and the factors causing it, They are an effective step in calculating the cost, but the lack of attention to the revenue of products in these models destroys the power of managers to classification of the most profitable products. The third-generation of activity based costing, Light TDABC, eliminates the problem. In order to carry out research, Hamvatan dairy products company was selected in 1395. By calculating the cost and operating profit using traditional models and TDABC, and then calculating the ratio of operating profit to sales and comparing the results obtained through the statistical model of the t-test, the two dependent societies concluded that between the teraditional and Light TDABC models, There is a significant difference in operating profit to sales. Subsequently, by classifying the products, we identified the most profitable products in accordance with the parrot principle.The revolution that generated the first and second generations of activity-based costing models, ABC and TDABC, in calculating the cost of finished goods, has made it a great help for decision makers. The traditional cost models, because of the lack of attention to the causal relationship between indirect costs and its causative factor, cause a lake of proper allocation of these costs to products, based on the activity-based costing models, by causally causing the causal relationship between the costs and the factors causing it, They are an effective step in calculating the cost, but the lack of attention to the revenue of products in these models destroys the power of managers to classification of the most profitable products. The third-generation of activity based costing, Light TDABC, eliminates the problem. In order to carry out research, Hamvatan dairy products company was selected in 1395. By calculating the cost and operating profit using traditional models and TDABC, and then calculating the ratio of operating profit to sales and comparing the results obtained through the statistical model of the t-test, the two dependent societies concluded that between the teraditional and Light TDABC models, There is a significant difference in operating profit to sales. Subsequently, by classifying the products, we identified the most profitable products in accordance with the parrot principle.

References:

*      احمدی لویه، افشین. (1395). "هزینه‌یابی بر مبنای فعالیت و تورم (دیدگاه فرامدرن در تخصیص هزینه‌های سربار)"، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 5(20): 37-46.

*      جامه بزرگ، تقی، فلاحت پیشه، یوسف، پسته‌ای، سید ذبیح‌الله. (1386). "وضعیت صنایع لبنی کشور"، وزارت صنایع و معادن، معاونت امور صنایع، دفتر صنایع غیر فلزی.  

*      جلیلی، آرزو و اشرافی، جواد. (1394). "تعیین سرانه دانشجو با استفاده از روش هزینه‌یابی بر مبنای فعالیت (بررسی موردی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران) "، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حسابداری مدیریت، 8(25):83-98.

*      خدارحمی، بهروز، بشیری منش، نازنین. (1393). "بررسی ساده‌سازی سیستم هزینه‌یابی بر مبنای فعالیت مبتنی بر محرک زمان‌گرا"، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 3(10):165-181.

*      دارابی، رویا. (1393). حسابداری مدیریت و سیستم مدیریت هزینه، تهران: انتشارات ترمه.

*      دوشابی، بهروز. (1394). "برآورد هزینه‌های فعالیت‌های مراکز خدماتی دولتی با استفاده از روش هزینه‌یابی بر مبنای فعالیت زمان‌گرا(مطالعه موردی یک سازمان خدماتی دولتی در ایران) "، فصلنامه مدیریت استاندارد و کیفیت(ISC)، 5(4):68-84.

*      رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون. (1388)، هزینه‌یابی بر مبنای فعالیت/ مدیریت بر مسنای فعالیت(ABC) / (ABM): رویکرد ارزش آفرینی در کسب و کار اقتصادی پویا، تهران: انتشارات ترمه. 

*      رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون، پوریوسف، اعظم. (1388). "هزینه‌یابی نوین در کسب و کار"، مجله حسابداری مدیریت، 2(2):9-23.

*       طالب‌نیا، قدرت‌الله، عابدینی، بیژن، حیدری‌زاده، علی. (1396). "بررسی تاثیر استقرار سامانه هزینه‌یابی بر مبنای فعالیت(ABC) در شرکت پالایش گاز سرخون و قشم بر بهای تمام شده محصولات سال‌های 1388 الی 1390"، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های جدید در مدیریت و حسابداری،3(25):55-86.

*      نمازی، محمد. (1393). حسابداری مدیریت استراتژیک: از تئوری تا عمل، جلد دوم، تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها(سمت).

*      همتی، حسن و همتی، هدی. (1393). حسابداری مدیریت پیشرفته، چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات ترمه.

*       Alsmadi, M., Almani, A., Khan Z. (2014). “Implementing an integrated ABC and TOC approach to enhance decision making in a Lean context”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 8(31): 906 – 920.

*       Bauer-Nilsen, K., Hill C., Trifiletti DM. Libby B., Lash DH. Lain M., Christodoulou D., Hodge C., and Showaiter TN. (2018). “Evaluation of Delivery Costs for External Beam Radiation Thertapy and Brachythetapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing”, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Physics, 1(100):88-94.

*      Carnes, K. and Hedin, S. (2005). “Accounting for Lean manufacturing: another missed opportunity?” , Management Accounting Quarterly, 1(7): 28 – 35.

*      Fullerton, R. and Wempe, W. (2008). “Lean manufacturing, non-financial performance measures, anf financial performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 3(29): 214-240.

*      Ganorkar Ashwin B., Lakhe Ramesh R., Agrawal Kamalkishor N. (2018). Impiementation of TDABC in SME: A Case Study, Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 29(2): 87-113.

*      Geri, D., Ronen, B. (2005). Relevance lost: the rise and fall of activity-based costing, Human system management 24:133-144.

*      Gregorio J., Russo G., and Lapao LV. (2016). ”Pharmaceutical services cost analysis using time-drinen activity-based costing: A contribution to improve community pharmavies management”, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 3(12): 475-485.

*      Kaplan, S. Robert, Anderson Steven R. (2007). Time Deriven Activity Based Costing. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

*      Siguenza-Guzman, L., Auquilla A., Abbeel A., and Cattrysse D. (2016). “Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing to Identify Best Practices in Academic Libraries”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3(42): 232-246.