Analysis of the regulations governing the proof of claims and management of proceedings in Iranian laws

Subject Areas : Journal of Law and Politics

Reza Yousefzadeh ¹ , ALI ZARE ^{2 *}

1 - Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Science and Research, Tehran, Iran
2 - DEPARTMENT OF PRIVATE LAW, FACULTY OF THEOLOGY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BRANCH, ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, TEHRAN, IRAN

Received: 2024-04-29 Accepted : 2024-08-05 Published : 2025-02-26

Keywords: Evidence to prove a lawsuit, management of proceedings, reasons for proceedings, fair proceedings,

Abstract :

As one of the most important legal departments, the regulations governing the proofs of the lawsuit and the management of proceedings are very important for the implementation of justice and the protection of the rights of individuals. These regulations have been provided by the legislator in order to guarantee the rights and obligations of individuals and must be implemented carefully and in accordance with legal principles and justice. The types of reasons in the civil procedure law include incidental reasons, legal and moral reasons, direct and indirect reasons. According to the civil procedure law, the use of evidence to prove the claim by the claimant or defend the claim by the defendant has a special meaning. The rules that are used to prove claims in foreign events such as lineage are different from the rules that are used to prove contracts, events and obligations. In the first case (external events), it is subject to the law that is enforceable at the time of filing a lawsuit, and in the second case, it is basically subject to the time of conclusion, unless the law of the time of conclusion at the time of filing a lawsuit is of Sharia evidence that is not enforceable, or otherwise in The law is specified. Proceedings information includes legal information (judgment) and factual information (thematic), each of which is placed in a special arbitration and reconciliation system. The management of this information is the responsibility of the judge.

References:

1. الماسی،نجادعلی، حبیبی درگاه،بهنام،(1391). درآمدی بر کیفیت دادرسی در فرآیند دادرسی کارآمد. دیدگاه‌های حقوق قضایی، ش 58.
2. امامی، حسن.(1378).حقوق مدنی.تهران،قائمیه.
3. حبیبی درگاه، بهنام،(1392). حقوق و اقتصاد(آیین ادرسی مدنی). تهران، جنگل.
4. _____،_____. (1391). درآمدی بر کیفیت دادرسی کارآمد. دیدگاه‌های حقوق قضایی، ش 58.
5. جعفری لنگرودی، محمد جعفر.(1387). ترمینولوژی حقوق. تهران گنج دانش.
6. شمس، عبداله. (1387). ادله‌ی اثبات دعوی. تهران، دراک.
7. ____، ____.(1394). آیین دادرسی مدنی بنیادین ج4. تهران، دراک.
8. ____،____.(1392). آیین دادرسی مدنی پیشرفته ج2. تهران، دراک.
9. ____،____.(1387). ادله اثبات دعوی، حقوق ماهوی و شکلی. تهران. دراک.
10. صالح احمدی،سعید.(1394). ادله اثبات دعوا در نظم حقوق کنونی. تهران، گام حق.
11. کاتوزیان، ناصر.(1392). اثبات و دلیل اثبات. ج 1 تهران، میزان.
12. ____،____(1395). اثبات و دلیل اثبات. ج1 تهران میزان.
13. ____،____.(1394). قانون مدنی در نظم کنونی. تهران، میزان.
14. کریمی،عباس،پرتو،حمیدرضا.(1395).آیین دادرسی مدنی ج2. تهران دادگستر.