Identifying factors affecting the development of e-government in the Ministry of Sports and Youth

Subject Areas : Innovation in Sports Management

seyed mohammad mosavi fakhr ¹ , Atousa GHASEMINEZHADDEHKORDI ^{2 *} , elham moradi ³

1 - PhD student, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shushtar, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Izeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Izeh, Iran

Received: 2024-06-13 Accepted : 2024-10-08 Published : 2025-01-04

Keywords: Electronic infrastructure, development, electronic government, Ministry of Sports and Youth.,

Abstract :

Electronic government in the Ministry of Sports and Youth is one of the important phenomena resulting from the use of information and communication technology, the implementation of which has had a profound change in the way of life, administration and leadership of countries, and is a combination of information technology and the web information network, which aims It is the direct provision of services to citizens, government employees, commercial sectors and other government sectors, therefore the purpose of this research is to identify the factors affecting the development of e-government in the Ministry of Sports and Youth. The current research method is qualitative with Glazer's approach and of an exploratory type. The statistical population included experts (members of the university's faculty - deputy ministers of the Ministry of Sports and Youth - senior managers of the Ministry of Sports and Youth). Field of study and having scientific writings related to the brand, having managerial positions and executive experience in the field of the present research were among the selection indicators for the initial list of experts. The sampling method was used as non-probability sampling, with targeted selection and with maximum diversity or heterogeneity. The sample size in this research was equal to 14 people based on the theoretical saturation index. The measurement tool was open interview and was analyzed based on three stages of open, central and selective coding. Based on data analysis, 73 primary concepts, 13 main categories were identified. The factors identified in this research include infrastructural factors, socio-cultural factors, organizational management factors, financial and economic factors, creating a platform for access to digital content, access to online services, human capital, system quality, information quality, trust, citizen satisfaction, usefulness. Perceived and perceived ease of use.

References:

سلامبولچی، علیرضا، حسینی، سید مجتبی، ربیعی مندجین، محمدرضا، اصغری صارم، علی. (1401). شناسایی مولفه‏های موثر بر اثربخشی سیاسی توسعه دولت الکترونیک در شرکت آب و فاضلاب استان تهران با روش دلفی. ماهنامه جامعه شناسی سیاسی ایران، 5(9)، 133-151.
• رستم زاده، نادر، افشاری، مصطفی، علم، زهرا، قربانی، سعید. (1401). تحلیل‏ کیفی حکمرانی خوب الکترونیک در وزارت ورزش و جوانان. ماهنامه جامعه شناسی سیاسی ایران، 5(10) ، 1091-1106.
• ابراهیمی، کریم، آذر, عادل، چیت سازیان، علیرضا. (1399). طراحی مدل سنجش کیفیت خدمات دولت الکترونیک مورد مطالعه: دفاتر پیشخوان دولت. پژوهش در مدیریت تولید و عملیات، 11(1)، 89-109.
• فیضی، کامران، مقدسی، علیرضا. (1384). دولت الکترونیک، بازآفرینی دولت در عصر اطلاعات. تهران، انتشارات ترمه.
• قلی پورسوته رحمت اله، منوریان عباس، الهیاری دوین ملیحه. (1398). طراحی مدل دولت الکترونیک در چارچوب اخلاقی حکمرانی خوب. اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری، ۱۴ (۵): ۱۸۶-۱۸۹
• رستم زاده, نادر, افشاری, مصطفی, علم, زهرا, قربانی, سعید. (1398). ارائة مدل حکمرانی خوب الکترونیک در وزارت ورزش‌وجوانان. مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی, 11(56), 43-62.
• دانایی‏فرد، حسن.، الوانی، سید مهدی.، آذر، عادل. (1398). روش شناسی پژوهش کیفی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع. تهران: انتشارات اشراقی، صفار
• باقری, مهدی. (1394). طراحی یک الگوی اثربخش جهت موفقیت ارائه خدمات الکترونیکی ثبت سفارش بازرگانی در بدنه دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران. مدیریت کسب و کار، 7(25)؛ 63-75.
• Kar, A. K., Sinha, SH., and Gupta, M.P. (2021). Digital India; Reflections and Practice, New Delhi, Springer press
• Lee, Ch. P., Chang, K., and Berry, F.S. (2017). “Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective”, Public Administration Review, 71(3): 444-454.
• Osman, I.H., Anouze, A.l., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Medeni, T.D., and Weerakkody, V. (2019). “A cognitive analytics management framework for the transformation of electronic government services from users’ perspective to create sustainable shared values”, European Journal of Operational Research, 278(2): 514–532.
• Brown, L. D. & Caylor, M. L. (2018). Corporate governance and firm operating performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32, 129-44
• Fang, Z, "E. (2018). Government in digital era: Concept, Practice and development: "International Journal management of computer", The Internet management, vol. 10.
• Jarvis, Ch., Scott, B. & MacKenzie, P. M. (2012). The negative consequences of measurement model misspecification. MIS Quarterly, 36, 139-46.
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M. & Ringle, Ch. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. LongRangePlanning, 45(5–6), 320–40.
• Snead, J. T., and Wright, E. (2014). “E-government research in the United States”, Government Information Quarterly, 31: 129–136.
• Yang, Ch.Gh. (2003). “Establishment and applications of the integrated model of service quality measurement”, Managing Service Quality, 13(4): 310-324
• Skinner, J., Edwards, A., & Corbett, B. (2014). Research methods for sport management. Routledge.
• Shilbury, D., Oboyle, I. & Ferkins, l. (2019). Towards a research agenda in collaborative sport governance. Sport Management Review. 19(5), 479-91.
• Ronaghan, S "Benchmarking E. (2017). Government: A global Perpective", U.N. division for public Economics and Public Administration.
• Moon, M. (2015). "The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality", Public Administration Review 62(4), 424-33
• Layne, K; Lee, J. (2015). "Developing fully functional: A Four stage model", Government information quarterly.
• Halchin, L. (2014). "The Coalition Provisional Authoritr (CPA): Origin, Characteristics, and Institutional Authorities", CRS Report for Congress, USA, (April, 29)