Structural Analysis and Comparison the Physical Architecture of Educational Spaces for Children, the case study: Amsterdam Center for Homeless Children and Isfahan Autism Garden

Subject Areas :

Moein Khamse Ashari ¹ (Department of Architecture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
Seyedeh Marzieh Tabaeian ² (Department of Architecture, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan. Iran. (Corresponding Author) [e-mail])

Received: 2023-06-27 Accepted : 2023-09-19 Published : 2023-08-23

Keywords: structural comparison, Amsterdam, Autism Garden, Care Center for Homeless Children, Homeless Children, Orphanage,

Abstract :

AbstractThis article attempts to compare and analyze two examples of Child Care locations to create an effective step towards improving the status of unaccompanied children and children with autism by finding the right answer. Analysis and comparison have a structural impact and provide clearer answers to identify and address the needs of children who are impaired for some reason. The aim of this study is to find the same answer as a result of comparing two projects implemented in this field. As a result of the background and theoretical foundations, it is inferred that space flexibility is one of the main design factors for children. It is also necessary to use the right and diverse volumes in simplicity and intricacy, the right decorations for the child and the dynamics of the plan. In addition to all these things what is important before designing and starting research is knowing the child and his characteristics and ultimately the unaccompanied child and autism. This research has been done in a fundamental way with a qualitative nature and a descriptive _analytic method and a comparative approach. Library and field methods have been used to collect basic information, Then two case examples are evaluated and compared . To examine the samples, the indicators were first determined for comparison, and according to the description, the examination of the spaces in both samples was considered taking into account the research topic. After evaluating all the points the principles of architectural design common components and distinctions and the positive and negative points of each building were analyzed. The positive and negative points in the findings section were analytically compared to be identified in the Amsterdam unaccompanied child care center and the Isfahan autism garden.Conflict of intrest: None declared.This article attempts to compare and analyze two examples of Child Care locations to create an effective step towards improving the status of unaccompanied children and children with autism by finding the right answer. Analysis and comparison have a structural impact and provide clearer answers to identify and address the needs of children who are impaired for some reason. The aim of this study is to find the same answer as a result of comparing two projects implemented in this field. As a result of the background and theoretical foundations, it is inferred that space flexibility is one of the main design factors for children. It is also necessary to use the right and diverse volumes in simplicity and intricacy, the right decorations for the child and the dynamics of the plan. In addition to all these things what is important before designing and starting research is knowing the child and his characteristics and ultimately the unaccompanied child and autism. This research has been done in a fundamental way with a qualitative nature and a descriptive _analytic method and a comparative approach. Library and field methods have been used to collect basic information, Then two case examples are evaluated and compared . To examine the samples, the indicators were first determined for comparison