Affective Norms for Persian Attachment Related Words
Subject Areas : دلبستگیGheysar Maleki 1 , Ali Mazaheri 2 , Vahid Nejati 3 , Khatereh Borhani 4 , Azin Seraj 5
1 - PhD Candidate in Psychology Shahid Beheshti University
2 - PhD
Shahid Beheshti University
3 - PhD
Shahid Beheshti University
4 - ,PhD
Shahid Beheshti University
5 - MA Student in Psychology Shahid Beheshti University
Keywords: attachment, word, Norms, arousal, emotional valence,
Abstract :
This study aimed to develop affective norms for Persian attachment related words in three phases. In the first phase, 72 students (43 female, 29 male) of Shahid Beheshti University were selected to collect attachment related words. In the second phase, 35 attachment specialists (27 female, 8 male) in Tehran, were chosen to evaluate attachment relevance of words. In the last phase, 124 students (65 female, 59 male) of Shahid Beheshti University were chosen and they rated selected words respect to emotional dimensions through Self-Assessment Manikin (Bradley & Lang, 1994) and attachment relevance. Pearson correlation coefficient and mixed ANOVA were used for analysis. After several phases of screening, 107 attachment related words were collected and we presented their emotional dimensions in a descriptive manner. Results showed that attachment relevance has a positive correlation with valence and negative correlation with arousal. There was a negative relationship between valence and arousal. Although females had a positive and negative bias in valence rating of respected words, there was no significant gender difference in arousal. The set of words that was prepared in this study can make the replication of results and scientific communication easier and provides the possibility of comparing results of different studies especially in the field of attachment.
ملکی،ق.،مظاهری،م. ودهقانی،م. (1392). ساختواعتباریابیآزمونداتپروببرایاندازهگیری توجه انتخابی نسبت به تصاویر مرتبط با دلبستگی. مجلهروانشناسی،17(3)،293 -275.
نجاتی،و.،ملکی،ق.،ذبیحزاده،ع. وصفرزاده،م. (1391). نقص توجه در اختلال وسواسـبیاختیاری: تعیینواژههایفارسیمرتبطباوسواسوسوگیریتوجهبهآنها. فصلنامه تحقیقاتعلومرفتاری،10(1)، 19 -10.
|
نظری، م.، خیاطی، ف.، پورشریفی، ح.، حکیمی، م. و شجاعی، ز. (1392). تهیه هنجار مقدماتی بار هیجانی واژگان فارسی. پژوهشهای کاربردی روانشناختی، 4(4)، 71 -41.
نظری، م.، نبیزاده چیانی، ق.، واحدی، ش. و رستمی، م. (1391). روایی و پایایی آزمون خودارزیابی تصاویر آدمک. پژوهش در سلامت روانشناختی، 6(2)، 61 -52.
Baldwin, M. W. (1995). Relational schemas and cognition in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(4), 547-552.
Baldwin, M. W., Fehr, B., Keedian, E., Seidel, M., & Thomson, D. W. (1993). An exploration of the relational schemata underlying attachment styles: Self-report and lexical decision approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 746-754.
Bosmans, G., Bowles, D. P., Dewitte, M., De Winter, S., & Braet, C. (2014). An experimental evaluation of the State Adult Attachment Measure: The influence of attachment primes on the content of state attachment representations. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology,5(2), 134-150.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Volume I. Attachement.London: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664-678.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research inPsychophysiology, University of Florida.
Bynion, T. M., & Feldner, M. T. (2017). Self-assessment manikin. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 1-3.
Cassidy, J., & Kobak, R. R. (1988). Avoidance and its relation to other defensive processes. Clinical Implications of Attachment,1, 300-323.
Chavis, J. M., & Kisley, M. A. (2012). Adult attachment and motivated attention to social images: Attachment-based differences in event-related brain potentials to emotional images. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 55-62.
Dan, O., & Raz, S. (2012). Adult attachment and emotional processing biases: an event-related potentials (ERPs) study. Biological Psychology, 91(2), 212-220.
Dan-Glauser, E. S., & Scherer, K. R. (2011). The Geneva affective picture database (GAPED): a new 730-picture database focusing on valence and normative significance. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 468-477.
Deng, Y., Chang, L., Yang, M., Huo, M., & Zhou, R. (2016). Gender differences in emotional response: Inconsistency between experience and expressivity. PloS One, 11(6), 30-41.
Dewitte, M., & De Houwer, J. (2008). Adult attachment and attention to positive and negative emotional face expressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 498-505.
Dewitte, M., & Koster, E. H. (2014). Attentional breadth and proximity seeking in romantic attachment relationships.British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 74-92.
Dewitte, M., De Houwer, J., Goubert, L., & Buysse, A. (2010). A multi-modal approach to the study of attachment-related distress. Biological Psychology, 85(1), 149-162.
Dewitte, M., Koster, E. H., De Houwer, J., & Buysse, A. (2007). Attentive processing of threat and adult attachment: A dot-probe study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(6), 1307-1317.
Donges, U. S., Zeitschel, F., Kersting, A., & Suslow, T. (2015). Adult attachment orientation and automatic processing of emotional information on a semantic level: A masked affective priming study. Psychiatry Research, 229(1), 174-180.
Dutton, D. G., Lane, R. A., Koren, T., & Bartholomew, K. (2016). Secure base priming diminishes conflict-based anger and anxiety. PloS One, 11(9), 11-22.
Dykas, M. J., Woodhouse, S. S., Jones, J. D., & Cassidy, J. (2014). Attachment‐related biases in adolescents’ memory. Child Development,85(6), 2185-2201.
Edelstein, R. S., & Gillath, O. (2008). Avoiding interference: Adult attachment and emotional processing biases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 171-181.
Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., ... & Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 488-496.
Fraley, R., Niedenthal, P. M., Marks, M., Brumbaugh, C., & Vicary, A. (2006). Adult attachment and the perception of emotional expressions: Probing the hyperactivating strategies underlying anxious attachment. Journal of Personality, 74(4), 1163-1190.
Gander, M., & Buchheim, A. (2015). Attachment classification, psychophysiology and frontal EEG asymmetry across the lifespan: a review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(79), 1-16.
Haberkamp, A., Glombiewski, J. A., Schmidt, F., & Barke, A. (2017). The DIsgust-RelaTed-Images (DIRTI) database: Validation of a novel standardized set of disgust pictures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 89, 86-94.
Ho, S. M., Mak, C. W., Yeung, D., Duan, W., Tang, S., Yeung, J. C., & Ching, R. (2015). Emotional valence, arousal, and threat ratings of 160 Chinese words among adolescents. PloS One, 10(7), 1-13.
Huffmeijer, R., Alink, L. R., Tops, M., Grewen, K. M., Light, K. C., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2013). The impact of oxytocin administration and maternal love withdrawal on event-related potential (ERP) responses to emotional faces with performance feedback. Hormones and Behavior, 63(3), 399-410.
Leyh, R., Heinisch, C., Kungl, M. T., & Spangler, G. (2016). Attachment representation moderates the influence of emotional context on information processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(278), 1-13.
Liu, Y., Ding, Y., Lu, L., & Chen, X. (2017). Attention Bias of Avoidant Individuals to Attachment Emotion Pictures. Scientific Reports, 7(41), 1-9.
Maier, M. A., Bernier, A., Pekrun, R., Zimmermann, P., Strasser, K., & Grossmann, K. E. (2005). Attachment state of mind and perceptual processing of emotional stimuli. Attachment & Human Development, 7(1), 67-81.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment‐related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events.Personal Relationships, 12(2), 149-168.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.
Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G., Woddis, D., & Nachmias, O. (2000). Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 509-532.
Monnier, C., & Syssau, A. (2014). Affective Norms for French Words(FAN). Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1128-1137.
Moors, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Wanmaker, S., Van Schie, K., Van Harmelen, A. L., ... & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 169-177.
Norman, L., Lawrence, N., Iles, A., Benattayallah, A., & Karl, A. (2014). Attachment-security priming attenuates amygdala activation to social and linguistic threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,10(6), 832-839.
Parsons, C. E., Young, K. S., Murray, L., Stein, A., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2010). The functional neuroanatomy of the evolving parent-infant relationship. Progress in Neurobiology, 91(3), 220-241.
Pizziconi, B. (2007). The lexical mapping of politeness in British English and Japanese. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 3(2), 207-241.
Rellecke, J., Palazova, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2011). On the automaticity of emotion processing in words and faces: event-related brain potentials evidence from a superficial task. Brain and Cognition, 77(1), 23-32.
Riegel, M., Wierzba, M., Wypych, M., Żurawski, Ł., Jednoróg, K., Grabowska, A., & Marchewka, A. (2015). Nencki affective word list (NAWL): The cultural adaptation of the Berlin affective word list–reloaded (BAWL-R) for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1222-1236.
Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. (2015). Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(15), 6010-6019.
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2004). What do self-report attachment measures assess. Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications, 17-54.
Soares, A. P., Comesaña, M., Pinheiro, A. P., Simões, A., & Frade, C. S.(2012). The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words(ANEW) for European Portuguese. Behavior Research Methods,44, 256-269.
Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1578-1593.
Swain, J. E., Kim, P., Spicer, J., Ho, S. S., Dayton, C. J., Elmadih, A., & Abel, K. M. (2014). Approaching the biology of human parental attachment: Brain imaging, oxytocin and coordinated assessments of mothers and fathers. Brain Research, 1580, 78-101.
Szymanska, M., Monnin, J., Noiret, N., Tio, G., Galdon, L., Laurent, E., ... & Vulliez-Coady, L. (2015). The Besancon affective picture set-adolescents (the BAPS-Ado): development and validation. Psychiatry Research, 228(3), 576-584.
Van Rensbergen, B., De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2016). Estimating affective word covariates using word association data. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1644-1652.
Vrticka, P., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012). Neuroscience of human social interactions and adult attachment style. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(212), 1-12.
Waller, C., Wittfoth, M., Fritzsche, K., Timm, L., Wittfoth-Schardt, D., Rottler, E., ... & Gündel, H. (2015). Attachment representation modulates oxytocin effects on the processing of own-child faces in fathers. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 62, 27-35.
Warren, S. L., Bost, K. K., Roisman, G. I., Silton, R. L., Spielberg, J. M., Engels, A. S., ... & Heller, W. (2010). Effects of adult attachment and emotional distractors on brain mechanisms of cognitive control. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1818-1826.