The role of self-development of school administrators in enhancing their performances (A case study: School administrators of Ray city)
Subject Areas : Educational PsychologyKhodayar Abili 1 , Javad Pourkarimi 2 , Ebrahim Mazari 3 , Kobra Khabare 4 , Sodabeh B adehban 5
1 - دانشیار دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران، تهران
2 - استادیار دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران، تهران
3 - کارشناسارشد مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه تهران، تهران(نویسنده مسئول)
4 - کارشناسارشد مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه تهران، تهران
5 - کارشناسارشد روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران
Keywords: Performance, Self- development, specific skills, school administrator,
Abstract :
This study aimed to investigate the role of Self-development of school administrators in their performance in Ray City. The research method was descriptive and correlational and the analysis used was structural equation modeling. The Statistical population was all school administrators of Rey city. Using Cochran's sampling formula, the researchers selected 180 managers by Stratified random sampling with proportional allocation. The manager Self-development questionnaire with the reliability of α=0/95 and performance questionnaire with the reliability of α=0/91 were used for the data collection. The structural equation modeling showed that basic knowledge and information with path coefficients (γ=0/79) have a significant effect on the on managers’ performance. In other words, managers who have adequate knowledge of the basic administrative facts and management will have better performance. Also, Self-Development meta-qualities included creativity, mental agility, balanced habits and skills of learning with path coefficients (γ=0/74) have an impact on the school principals’ performanas. Finally, goodness of fit index (GFI), incremental fitness index (IFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), normalized fitness index (NFI) and the comparative elegance of goodness index (AGFI) did not confirm the impact of the Self-development specific skills on the principals, performances.
ابیلی، خدایار. موفقی، حسن. (1389). مدیریت منابع انسانی(با تأکید بر رویکردهای نوین). تهران: انتشارات سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
سلیمانی، افشین. (1384). کلاس خلاقیت. چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات انجمن اولیاء و مربیان.
سیف، علی اکبر. (1392). روانشناسی پرورشی نوین. تهران: انتشارات دوران.
شیرازی، علی. (1384). مقدمات مدیریت آموزشی. مشهد: انتشارات آیین تربیت.
ضرغامی، حمیدرضا. جعفری، مصطفی. (1390). بررسی رابطه خلاقیت و انگیزه افراد برای نوآوری در سازمانهای پژوهشی: مطالعه موردی در پژوهشکده پردازش هوشمند علائم. قابل دسترس سایت پایگاه علمی مقالات مدیریت : www.system.parsiblog.com
علاقهبند، علی. (1390).مبانی نظری و اصول مدیریت آموزشی. تهران، نشر روان.
مزاری، ابراهیم. (1392). بررسی رابطه ویژگیهای خودتوسعهای مدیران و عملکرد آنان و ارایه راهکارهای بهبود وضعیت مدیران مدارس شهر ری. پایاننامه کارشناسیارشد مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه تهران.
میرکمالی، سیدمحمد. (1382). رهبری و مدیریت آموزشی. تهران: نشر رامین.
میرکمالی، سیدمحمد. (1386). رفتار و روابط در سازمان و مدیریت. تهران: انتشارات یسطرون.
هرمن، جری جی. هرمن، جانیس ال. (1384). برنامه ریزی تغییر و نوگردانی در مدیریت آموزشی. (ترجمه علی علاقه بند)، تهران: نشرارسباران.
Boyce, L. A., Wisecarveer, M. M., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Understanding, predicting, and supporting leader self-development. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, available in www.Google.com
Charan, R., Drotter, S., & Noel, J. (2001). The leadership pipeline: How to build the leadership powered company. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. available in www.Google.com
Connolly, J.A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2002). Assessing the construct validity of a measure of learning agility. Presented at the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, available in www.Google.com
Cortina, J., Zaccaro, S., McFarland, L., Baughman, K., Wood, G., & Odin, E. (2004). Promoting realistic self-assessment as the basis for effective leader self-development. ARI Research Leader Development Research Unit, 12(2),1-69
Crant, J. M (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462
Ellinger, A. D. (2004). The concept of self-directed learning and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 158−177.
Furtner, M. R. Hiller, L. N; Martini, M; Sachse, P. (2012). Self-Leadership, Motivation to Lead, Trans-Formational Leadership and Superleadership: A Key to Organizational Success in the 21st Century. International Journal of Business and Management Tomorrow, 2 (7) 1-8
Goldsmith, M. (2007). What got you here won’t get you there: How successful people become even more successful. New York: Hyperion.
Houghton,J.F; Bonham,C; Foti,R.J; Madigan,R.M; Neck,CH.P; Singh,K (2000). The Relationship between Self-Leadership and Personality: A Comparison of Hierarchical Factor Structures. Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Management, State University
Knowles, M. S. (2000). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press
Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (2000). High potentials as high learners. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 321-329.
London M, Holtlarsen, Thisted L N (2013). Relationships Between Feedback and Self-Development. Group & Organization Management, 24(2) 5-12
Mahoney, M. J., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1979). Self-management: Theory, research, and application. In J. P. Brady & D. Pomerleau (Eds.), Behavioral medicine Theory and practice, 31(4) 75-96.
Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3) 585-600.
Manz, C. C. (1992). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc
McCall, M. W., Jr. (1998). High flyers: Developing the next generation of leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
McCall, M. W., Jr., & Hollenbeck, G. P. (2008). Developing the expert leader. Journal of People & Strategy, 31(1), 20-29
Mestry, R. &Grobler, B. R. (2004). The Training and Development of Principals to Manage Schools Effectively Using the Competence Approach, ISEA, 32 (3), 2 – 19.
Ministry of Basic Education, Sport and Culture. (2001). Education for All National Plan for Action 2001 – 2015. Wind hoek: MBESC.
Murphy, S. E. (2002). Leader self-regulation: The role of self-efficacy and multiple intelligences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Mushaandja,J(2013). In-Service Professional Development Approaches for Principals in Namibia. International Journal of Social Science Tomorrow. 2(2), 121-1134
Neck, C. P. & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(3), 270-295
Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1996). Thought self-leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee behavior, cognition, and emotion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 445-467
Odierno, R, T(2013). Army Leader Development Program. Department of the Army Washington, DC, 1-24
Orvis, k.; Gregory P. Leffler (2011). Individual and contextual factors: An interactionist approach to understandingemployee self-development. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 172–177
Peadler, M., burgoyne, J. and boydel, T. (2001).A manager gauide,s to sel-development. forth edition london. Mcgrawhill.
Reichard, R. J, Stefanie K. Johnson(2011). Leader self-development as organizational strategy. The Leadership Quarterly, 22 (2), 33–42
Roberts, m.k, Stanley Halpin, and Jason M. Brunner(2012). Leader Identity, Individual Differences, and Leader Self-development. United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 13(4),1-34
Shelton, E. (2012). Transformational Leadership: Trust, Motivation and Engagement. Trafford Publishing, available inhttp://www.amazon.com
U. S. Department of the Army (2008). Training for full spectrum operations. Retrieved from http://usacac.army.mil/CAC2/digitalpublications.asp
Zeren, S .G. (2012). Can Piaget, Freud or Erikson explain my self-development? Preservice teachers’ personal evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(12), 2445 – 2450