The position, validity and methodology of the book Al-Modavvana Abi Ghanem Khorasani in Abadhi jurisprudence.

Subject Areas :

Mehdi Sotoudeh Kaviri Arani ¹ , Hossein Khushdel Mofard ² , Mohammad Nasehi ³

1 - PhD student in Theology and Islamic Studies, Kashan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran [e-mail]
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Kashan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran (corresponding author) [e-mail]
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Kashan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran [e-mail]

Received: 2023-05-27 Accepted : 2023-09-16 Published : 2023-09-22

Keywords: fiqh, Hadith, Abadiah, Al-modavana alkobra, Abu Ghanem Khorasani,

Abstract :

The jurisprudential works of Abadiyyah - a sect that branched off from the Kharijite body which has continued its political and ideological life until now - are important not only in the study of the history of this sect, but also in the jurisprudential studies of the history of Islam, especially in the areas of the peninsula and North Africa. They deserve attention. Among the authors of Abazi works, Bishr bin Ghanem (Abu Ghanem Khorasani) has a prominent position. In this article, the validity of al-Maduna Abu Ghanem and the author's reliability and his method have been investigated, and the most important question to investigate is the position and validity of this book among muhaddiths and jurists. The result is that it is difficult to prove that al-Maduna is fake and baseless, which some non-Abadi scholars have attached to it, and Abadi scholars agree on the authenticity and authenticity of its hadiths. One of the strengths of al-Madoonah is accuracy in quoting hadiths, comparative studies and comparative jurisprudence, and expressing jurisprudential issues in the form of questions and answers. However, confusions such as the mixing of hadith with the sayings of elders, as well as the inclusion of narrations unrelated to the topic of each chapter and messenger, and the interruption of narrations, are considered the weaknesses of this book. There is a possibility that these weaknesses made their way into the book due to Abu Ghanem not editing the book himself.