Review of concepts invalidity and corruption of the contract and its works in Imami Jurisprudence and Iranian Law
Subject Areas :
Keywords:
Abstract :
Review of concepts invalidity and corruption of the contract and its works in Imami Jurisprudence and Iranian Law Abstract At the start and apparently corrupt contract and void contract are two concepts seem identical. But after contemplate and review will be two different definitions the void contract is not correct and this lack of effect is due to failure of the main pillars of the contract. The pillars of the civil code, in article 190, 4 paragraph is expressed. But the corrupt contract from the outset and inherently is correct, then the effect of foreign credits would-be to corrupt contract. Some jurists didn’t consider the corrupt contract and the void one to two different definitions. It also followed from lawyers and they didn’t tell different between the two. Civil law with the result that knew both, one contract, that is the futility of the contract. But did not provide any definition to the reader according to the definitions in order to realize his legal materials. But the scope of inclusion of the two contract be seen different; so that the void contract is correct. So that the void contract located the correct one. But the corrupt contract is included from the void contract and blunt contract. As jurists such as Sheikh Ansari and Fazel Miqdad said so. Naturally, these contracts will follow the works including the fact that the recipient is not the owner of property and will be obliged to return it. In other words, he will be the sponsor to the property. And if some condition be included in contract comply with the contract will be voided and don’t need to be fulfilled to it. Keywords: corrupt contract, void contract, Imami jurists, law, code.
_||_