Justice and Fairness through Perceptions and Validities: A Comparison Theories of Tabatabaei and Rawls

Subject Areas : Governmental jurisprudence

Fateme Abbasi ^{1 *} , Mahmoud Abaei ² , mohammad kazem rezazadehjoudi ³

1 - PhD student, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Theology and Islamic Philosophy, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2023-12-22 Accepted : 2024-03-15 Published : 2024-09-22

Keywords: justice, constructivism, credit Perceptions, Allameh Tabatabaiy, John Rawls,

Abstract :

                                                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                            

 

Abstract

Justice is one of the most fundamental social words, it is one of the indisputable principles of divine systems to achieve that one of the constant goals of all popular uprisings and the promise of all social systems when attracting the votes of different segments of the people, but the question is justice an obvious and real category or credit? In either case, look at this category differently as a result, it will have different perceptions and effects, Allameh Tabatabai following the discussions related to credit It deals with some principles of social systems, including justice and has explained them based on her philosophical and theological principles. On the other hand, this category has also considered in Western philosophy As John Rawls, a contemporary American philosopher and a leading figure in political philosophy and ethics, in addition to freedom and equality, his concern for justice was ingrained in his mind, which led to the creation of his important works. He considered one of the revivers of the social contract and expands the issue of justice by choosing "credibility". To understand John Rawls' philosophy, one must consider the key concepts of his philosophy. It should note that he owes himself to Kant's philosophy and according to Kant's credentials; Rawls will better understand Credibility. However, in Allameh's philosophical view, Reason and rational analysis of issues and it is important to base the arguments on rational arguments in the first place. On the other hand, we know that Allameh, along with reason, He has also paid attention to narrative issues and mystical behavior. This article tries to It examines the views of both philosophers on the perceptions of credit and credentials and the influence of these credentials on their theory of justice

                                                                                                                                                      

 

References:

منابع و مآخذ تالیس، رابرت، 1397، فلسفة رالز، مترجم : خشایار دیهیمی، فرهنگ نشر نو.
جونز، و.ت، 1383، خداوندان اندیشه سیاسی، جلد دوم، مترجم : علی رامین، امیرکبیر.
خسروپناه، عبدالحسين، 1385، فلسفه‌هاي مضاف، تهران، پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی.
رالز، جان، 1383، عدالت به مثابه انصاف، مترجم : عرفان ثابتی، تهران، ققنوس.
طباطبايي، علامه، محمد حسين‌، 1382، اسلام و انسان معاصر، جامعه مدرسین.
طباطبايي، علامه، محمد حسين‌، بی‌تا. اصـول فلسفه و روش رئاليسم، ج٢، مقدمه و پاورقي به قلم استاد شهيد مرتضي مطهـري، قـم، صدرا.
طباطبايي، علامه، محمد حسين، 1381، انسان از آغاز تا انجام، ترجمه صادق لاريجاني، قم، بوستان کتاب.
طباطبايي، علامه، محمد حسين‌، 1355، بررسي‌‌هاي اسلامي، به کوشش سـيد ‌هـادي خسرو شاهي، قم، هجرت.
طباطبايي، علامه، محمد حسين‌، 1353، تفسير الميزان، مترجم : همداني، مکارم و ديگران، تهران، مـحمدي.
طباطبايي، علامه، محمد حسين، 1362، رسائل سبعه، قم، بنیاد علمی و فکری استاد علامه محمدحسین طباطبایی.
طباطبايي، علامه، محمد حسين‌، 1391، روابط اجتماعی در اسلام، تهران، پيام اسلام.
طباطبايي، علامه، محمد حسين‌، 1379، نهایه الحکمه، قم، بوستان کتاب.
عميد زنجاني، عباسعلي، 1385، مباني انديشه سياسي اسلام، چاپ سوم، تهران، پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و انديشه‌ اسلامي‌.
لوین، مایکل، 1385، قرارداد اجتماعی، (فرهنگ اندیشه¬های سیاسی: قرارداد اجتماعی)، مترجم: خشایار دیهیمی، نشر نی.
مصباح یزدی، محمدتقي، 1383، آموزش فلسفه، ج 1، قم، مؤسسۀ آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی(ره).
مصباح یزدی، محمدتقي، 1387، نقد و بررسي مكاتب اخلاقی، قم، مؤسسۀ آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی(ره).
مطهری، مرتضی، 1376، عدل الهی، تهران، صدرا.
مطهری، مرتضی، 1363، نقدی بر مارکسیسم، تهران، صدرا.
مک ناوتن، دیوید، 1380، بصیرت اخلاقی، مترجم : محمود فتحعلی، قم، مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی (ره). Castiglione, D. (2015). Introduction the Logic of Social Cooperation for Mutual Advantage – the Democratic Contract. Political Studies Review. 13 (2): 161–175.
Falaky, F. (2014). Social Contract, Masochist Contract: Aesthetics of Freedom and Submission in Rousseau. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Green, L. (2018). Legal Positivism, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Marmor, A. and Sarch, A. (2015). The Nature of Law, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
ONeil, O. (2002). “The Cambridge Companion to Rawls”, Ed, Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). “A Theory of justice”, Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). Collected papers, Edited by Samuel Freeman, Harvard university press.
Sommers, R. (2021). Experimental jurisprudence. Science. 373 (3): 394–399.