Enhancing Cognitive Skills for Digital Transformation: Assessing Metacognitive Abilities in Complex Environments

Subject Areas : Research & Development

Punita Raj ^{1 *} , Ioana Filipas ² , François Marmier ³ , Devika Sangwan ⁴

1 - University of Strasbourg, CNRS Icube laboratory, Strasbourg, France
2 - Department of Industrial Management & Innovation, BETA, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
3 - University of Strasbourg, CNRS Icube laboratory, Strasbourg, France
4 - Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS Pilani), Pilani, India

Received: 2025-07-07 Accepted : 2025-09-20 Published : 2025-11-10

Keywords: metacognitive awareness, Industry 4.0, cognitive skills, mathematics problem-solving, Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI),

Abstract :

The rapid advancements in digital transformation present unprecedented opportunities and complexities, necessitating individuals to develop advanced cognitive skills to face these dynamic environments effectively. This study explores the relationship between metacognitive awareness, problem-solving efficiency, and challenges in human-machine collaboration within the context of digital transformation. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the paper integrates quantitative data from the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews analyzed using NVivo, involving 150 participants from engineering, IT, and related fields. The findings reveal that higher metacognitive awareness significantly correlates with enhanced problem-solving efficiency, including greater accuracy, faster completion times, and better retention of learned skills. Key themes such as adaptability, continuous learning, and critical thinking emerged as essential for effective problem-solving in rapidly evolving technological landscapes. Additionally, the study identifies practical challenges, such as communication barriers with intelligent systems and the need for trust and ethical considerations in technology use. The results underscore the importance of developing targeted educational strategies and workforce training programs that incorporate metacognitive training, practical problem-solving exercises, and ethics discussions. By addressing these areas, organizations and educational institutions can better prepare individuals to solve the complexities of digital transformation responsibly and effectively. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies and the role of cultural and organizational factors in shaping metacognitive awareness and problem-solving strategies.

References:

1. Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9).
2. Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 205.
3. Birgili, B. (2022). Mixed Methods Research at the Intersection of Mathematics Teachers’ Adoption of Curriculum Change and Assessment of Students’ Readiness Level Through Educational Neuroscience Methods.
4. Braad, E., Degens, N., Barendregt, W., & IJsselsteijn, W. (2022). Improving metacognition through self-explication in a digital self-regulated learning tool. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(6), 2063-2090.
5. Carvalho, A. R., & Santos, C. (2022). Developing peer mentors’ collaborative and metacognitive skills with a technology-enhanced peer learning program. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100070.
6. Çini, A., Järvelä, S., Dindar, M., & Malmberg, J. (2023). How multiple levels of metacognitive awareness operate in collaborative problem solving. Metacognition and Learning, 18(3), 891-922.
7. Drigas, A., & Mitsea, E. (2020). The 8 pillars of metacognition. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(21), 162-178.
8. González Cabañes, E., García Fernández, T., Álvarez García, D., Fernández Alba, M. E., & Rodríguez Pérez, C. (2022). Validation of the shortened version of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory in Spanish university students. Psicothema.
9. Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Metacognitive skills and problem-solving. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(3), 715-734.
10. Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar, C. A., & McGovern, M. (2020). Competencies for Industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14, 1511-1524.
11. Ihor, P., & Ruslana, K. (2021). Metacognitive awareness and academic self-regulation of HEI students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 9(2), 161-172.
12. Jang, Y., Lee, H., Kim, Y., & Min, K. (2020). The relationship between metacognitive ability and metacognitive accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 411-434.
13. Kim, J. (2023). Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-32.
14. Kipper, L. M., Iepsen, S., Dal Forno, A. J., Frozza, R., Furstenau, L., Agnes, J., & Cossul, D. (2021). Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by Industry 4.0. Technology in Society, 64, 101454.
15. Kumar, K., Zindani, D., & Davim, J. P. (2019). Industry 4.0: Developments towards the fourth industrial revolution. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
16. Lea, Q. T. (2020). Orientation for an education 4.0: A new vision for future education in Vietnam. Int. J. Innov, 11(3).
17. Marantika, J. E. R. (2021). Metacognitive ability and autonomous learning strategy in improving learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 88-96.
18. Moloko, L. D. K. (2021). Fourth Industrial revolution leadership imperatives for the South African fast moving goods industry. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
19. Muijs, D., & Bokhove, C. (2020). Metacognition and self-regulation: Evidence review. Education Endowment Foundation.
20. Padmanabha, C. H. (2020). Metacognition: Conceptual framework. Journal on Educational Psychology, 14(1), 1-11.
21. Peres, R. S., Jia, X., Lee, J., Sun, K., Colombo, A. W., & Barata, J. (2020). Industrial artificial intelligence in Industry 4.0: A systematic review, challenges, and outlook. IEEE Access, 8, 220121-220139.
22. Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive strategies and development of critical thinking in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913219.
23. Rosin, F., Forget, P., Lamouri, S., & Pellerin, R. (2022). Enhancing the decision-making process through Industry 4.0 technologies. Sustainability, 14(1), 461.
24. Shahin, M., Chen, F. F., Bouzary, H., & Krishnaiyer, K. (2020). Integration of Lean practices and Industry 4.0 technologies: Smart manufacturing for next-generation enterprises. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 107, 2927-2936.
25. Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Räisänen, M., Hailikari, T., & Parpala, A. (2023). Metacognitive awareness in relation to university students’ learning profiles. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 37-54.
26. Veile, J. W., Kiel, D., Müller, J. M., & Voigt, K. I. (2020). Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(5), 977-997.