Moderate attitude about the origine of the differences between Usuians and Akhbarians
Subject Areas : فقه و تاریخ تمدّن
علی غضنفری
1
,
خدیجه احمدی بیغش
2
*
1 - Associate professor, Department of Quranic and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Quranic Sciences, University of Qur'anic Studies and Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Assistant professor, Department of the Quran and Hadith, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author).
Keywords: usulists, akhbarists, hadiths, usul rules, ijtihad,
Abstract :
The method of understanding the religion is one of the main sources among the Akhbarist and Usulism. This method has been common for more than four centuries. Different understanding of the texts have been caused further differences between these two groups the present study investigates that these differences caused the creation of these schools.
Studies reveals that, the differences are not so great that it can be considered a separate school for each other. Differences such as about debate on apparent meaning of Quran, the rules which contained in the traditional religion, the validity of four books, the method of dividing hadiths, stagnation in understanding hadiths and respect for ijtihad. In relation to these two theories, should consider a moderate point of view.
The differences is not such that that two separate schools are considered and in examining the two theories. The Quran should be kept in mind.