Comparative Study-Comparison of Archaeological Thoughts of Mirza Fath Ali Akhondzadeh and Ebrahim Pourdavood

Subject Areas : Journal of History (Tarikh)

Ali  ferdosi ¹ (PhD Student, Bojnourd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd, Iran)
omid  sepehri rad ² (Assistant Professor, Bojnourd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd, Iran)
Amir  Akbari ³ (Assistant Professor, Bojnourd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd, Iran)

Received: 2020-07-08 Accepted : 2020-11-14 Published : 2020-11-21

Keywords: Archeology, The backwardness of Iran, Akhundzadeh, Purdavud,

Abstract :

At present, it is possible to refer to the views and opinions of Akhundzadeh (1227-1295 AH) and Ibrahim Pourdawood (1264-1347 AH) in ancient Iran, and how to use culture and civilization in this period. Throughout history, the land of Iran has been sufficient, and it has never enjoyed the invasion of the Tazians, the head of the enemy, and its spectacular features. The right of intellectuals to make this invasion a tragedy is the best manifestation of the history of Iran, and you may also choose faith and belief. As a secular intellectual, Akhundzadeh seeks the real root of Iran's regression in the Qajar period. He called the attack of the Tazians and the role of Islam in the backwardness of the Iranian society about caring for their teachers at the cost of explaining the differences between the two in ancient Iran and the Islamic world. Adjust it. And the glory of ancient Iran, there is no scale pricing with the Islamic period. Purdavood Ta'alf Akhundzadeh, with the passage of time and the culture of ancient Iran, you translated Avesta into Persian. At present, it is possible to refer to the views and opinions of Akhundzadeh (1227-1295 AH) and Ibrahim Pourdawood (1264-1347 AH) in ancient Iran, and how to use culture and civilization in this period.